Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A high degree of flexibility is required for advancement in technology, rapid delivery to market, meeting customers demands and flexible manufacturing system is ideal for solving these problems. There are some variables which not only affect the flexibility but also affect each other. In this paper, twelve factors have been identified through the literature review and they are further analysed with the help of weighted interpretive structural modeling approach. In this research, a questionnaire based survey was conducted to rank these factors and ISM based approach has been employed to analyse their mutual interaction and interpretation of factors in terms of their driving and dependence powers has been examined. The structural model developed using this methodology helps to understand the interaction between various factors affecting the flexibility and their managerial implications. A method of effectiveness index is used to identify the key factors. The effectiveness index evaluated in this paper will help the industries to benchmark their performance by focussing on the factors reported in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand V (2012) How to improve throughput in component conformance and maximize output. QuEST Global Services. www.quest-global.com/newsroom/CMM%20CoE.pdf

  • Attri R, Grover S, Dev N, Kumar D (2013a) Analysis of barriers of total productive maintenance (TPM). Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attri R, Grover S, Dev N, Kumar D (2013b) An ISM approach for modelling the enablers in the implementation of total productive maintenance (TPM). Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzone G, Bertele U (1989) Measuring the economic effectiveness of flexible automation: a new approach. Int J Prod Res 27:735–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu BS, Srinivasan G (2010) The impact of volume, routing and product mix flexibilities on the performance of a job shop: a simulation study. Int J Enterp Netw Manag 4(2):107–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayazit O (2005) Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. J Manuf Technol Manag 16(7):808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JJ, Mohamed Z (1992) The measurement and use of operational flexibility in the loading of flexible manufacturing systems. Eur J Oper Res 60:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beskese A, Kahraman C, Irani Z (2004) Quantification of flexibility in advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy concept. Int J Prod Econ 89(1):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolanos R, Fontela E, Nenclares A, Paster P (2005) Using interpretive structural modeling in strategic decision making groups. Manag Decis 43(6):877–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brill P, Mandelbaum M (1989) On measures of flexibility in manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 27(5):747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi S, Stecke K (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag 2(2):114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardy RL, Krzystofiak FJ (1991) Interfacing high technology operations with blue collar workers: selection and appraisal in a computerized manufacturing setting. J High Technol Manag Res 2(2):193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan FTS (1999) Evaluations of operational control rules in scheduling a flexible manufacturing system. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 15(2):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan FTS, Swarnkar R (2006) Ant colony optimization approach to a fuzzy goal programming model for a machine tool selection and operation allocation problem in an FMS. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 22(4):353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chand M, Singh RK (2010) Study of select issues of supply chain management: a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Syst 1(2):151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand M, Raj T, Shankar R (2014a) Analysing the operational risks in supply chain by using weighted interpretive structural modeling (W-ISM) technique. Int J Serv Oper Manag 18(4):378–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand M, Raj T, Shankar R (2014b) Analysing the operational risks in supply chain by using weighted interpretive structure modelling technique. Int J Serv Oper Manag 18(4):378–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand M, Raj T, Shankar R (2015) Weighted-ISM technique for analysing the competitiveness of uncertainty and risk measures in supply chain. Int J Logist Syst Manag 21(2):181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J-H, Ho S-Y (2005) A novel approach to production planning of flexible manufacturing systems using an efficient multi-objective genetic algorithm. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:949–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CH, Chen IJ (1989) A systematic assessment of the value of flexibility for an FMS. In: Stecke KE, Suri R (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd ORS4/TIMS conference on FMS. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CH, Chen IJ (1990) Managing the flexibility of Flexible Manufacturing System 10, competitive edge. In: Liberatore M (ed) Selection and evaluation at advanced manufacturing technologies. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 280–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland G, Schroeder RG, Anderson JC (1989) A theory of production competence. Decis Sci 20(4):655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero R (1997) Changing human resources to make flexible manufacturing system (FMS) successful. J High Technol Manag Res 8(2):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groote X (1988) The manufacturing/marketing interface. Wharton Decision Sciences, working paper No 88-09-06

  • Duperrin JC, Godet M (1973) Methode De Hierar Chization Des Elements D’um System. In: Proceedings of Rapport Economique De CEA. Paris, pp 45–51

  • Faisal MN, Banwat DK, Shankar R (2006) Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Bus Process Manag J 12(4):532–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Faisal MN, Banwat DK, Shankar R (2007) Information risks management in supply chain: an assessment and mitigation framework. J Enterp Inf Manag 20(6):677–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris DR, Sage AP (1975) On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment. Comput Electr Eng 2(2):149–174

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ficko M, Brezocnik M, Balic J (2004) Designing the layout of single- and multiple-rows flexible manufacturing system by genetic algorithms. J Mater Process Technol 157:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filote C, Ciufudean C (2010) Discrete event models for flexible manufacturing cells. In: Aized T (ed) Future manufacturing systems. In Tech. ISBN: 978-953-307-128-2. http://www.intechopen.com/books/future-manufacturing-systems/discrete-event-models-for-flexiblemanufacturing-cells

  • Grave S (1988) Safety stocks in manufacturing systems. J Manuf Oper Manag 1(1):67–101

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Groover MP (2003) Automation, production systems and computer integrated manufacturing. Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman RA (1991) Flexible manufacturing systems: issues and implementation. Ind Manag 31(4):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain V, Raj T (2015) Modeling and analysis of FMS flexibility factors by TISM and fuzzy MICMAC. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6(3):350–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2004) IT enablement of supply chains: modelling the enablers. Int J Product Perform Manag 53(8):700–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2005) IT enablement of supply chains: modeling the enablers. Int J Product Perform Manag 53(8):700–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V (1987) Entropic measures of manufacturing flexibility. Int J Prod Res 25(7):957–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Sharma RK (2015) An ISM based framework for structural relationship among various manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6(4):511–521

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar AP, Tiwari MK, Shankar R, Baveja A (2006) Solving machine-loading problem of a flexible manufacturing system with a constraint-based genetic algorithm. Eur J Oper Res 175(2):1043–1069

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra MK, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16(4):407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone DW (1975) An Introduction to the application of interpretive structural modelling. Proc IEEE 63:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Datta S, Mahapatra SS (2012) Interrelationship of drivers for agile manufacturing: an Indian experience. Int J Serv Oper Manag 11(1):35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagar B, Raj T (2012) Analysis of critical success factors for implementation of humanised flexible manufacturing system in industries. Int J Logist Econ Glob 4(4):309–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak NK, Ray PK (2012) Production system flexibility and product quality relationships in manufacturing firm: an empirical research. Int J Strateg Eng Asset Manag 1(1):91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbayrak M, Bell R (2003) A knowledge-based decision support system for the management of parts and tools in FMS. Decis Support Syst 35:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piore MJ, Sabel CF (1984) The second industrial divide: possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books, New York, p 203

    Google Scholar 

  • Primrose PL, Verter V (1996) Do companies need to measure their production flexibility. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(6):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi MN, Kumar D, Kumar P (2007) Modeling the logistics outsourcing relationships variables to enhance shippers productivity and competitiveness in logistics supply chain. Int J Product Perform Manag 56(8):689–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj T (2004) Improving productivity and flexibility of a machine shop by implementing AMT. Un-published M.E. Production Engineering Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi University, India

  • Raj T, Shankar R, Suhaib M (2007) An ISM approach for modeling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case of India. Int J Prod Res 46(24):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj T, Shankar R, Suhaib M (2008) An ISM approach for modeling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India. Int J Prod Res 46(24):6883–6912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj T, Shankar R, Suhaib M (2009) An ISM approach to analyse interaction between barriers of transition to flexible manufacturing system. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 16(4):417–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj T, Attri R, Jain V (2012) Modeling the factors affecting flexibility in FMS. Int J Ind Syst Eng 11(4):350–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao KVS, Deshmukh SG (1994) Strategic framework for implementing flexible manufacturing systems in India. Int J Oper Prod Manag 14(4):50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi V, Shankar R (2005) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Social Changes 72(8):1011–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi AK, Sethi SP (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 2(4):289–328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Terence AS, Shin J (1995) Consumer ethnocentrism: a test of antecedents and moderators. J Acad Mark Sci 23(1):26–37

  • Singh RK (2011) Developing the framework for coordination in supply chain of SMEs. Bus Process Manag J 17(4):619–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Garg S (2007) Interpretive structural modeling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs. Int J Product Qual Manag 2(4):423–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MD, Kant R (2008) Knowledge management barriers: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 3(2):141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh MD, Shankar R, Narain R, Agarwal A (2003) An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries. J Adv Manag Res 1(1):28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singholi A, Ali M, Sharma C (2012) Impact of manufacturing flexibility on FMS performance: a simulation study. Int J Ind Syst Eng 10(1):96–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Singholi A, Ali M, Sharma C (2013) Evaluating the effect of machine and routing flexibility on flexible manufacturing system performance. Int J Serv Oper Manag 16(2):240–261 (ISSN:1744-2389)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soon YK, Park CS (1987) Economic measure of productivity, quality and flexibility in advanced manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 6(3):193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spano MR, O’Grady PJ, Young RE (1993) The design of flexible manufacturing systems. Comput Ind 21:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian C, Chandrasekaran M, Govind DS (2010) Analyzing the buyer supplier relationship factors: an integrated modeling approach. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 5(4):292–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujono S, Lashkari RS (2007) A multi-objective model of operation allocation and material handling system selection in FMS design. Int J Prod Econ 105:116–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamidass P (1988) Manufacturing flexibility. Monograph No. 2. Operations Management Association

  • Thakkar J, Deshmukh SG, Gupta AD, Shankar R (2007) Development of score card: an integrated approach of ISM and ANP. Int J Product Perform Manag 56(1):25–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakkar J, Kanda A, Deshmukh SG (2008) Evaluation of buyer-supplier relationships using an integrated mathematical approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and graph theoretic approach. J Manuf Technol Manag 19(1):92–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn B, Peretz JH (2007) State level benefits of energy efficiency. Energy Policy 35:3665–3674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma RK (2014) Implementation of interpretive structural model and topsis in manufacturing industries for supplier selection. Ind Eng Lett 4(5):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield JN (1973) Binary matrices in systems modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Men Cybern 3(5):441–449

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield J (1974) Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Trans Syst Men Cybern 4(1):51–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, 121006, India

    Suman Gothwal & Tilak Raj

Authors
  1. Suman Gothwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tilak Raj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suman Gothwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gothwal, S., Raj, T. Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8, 408–422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0443-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0443-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation