Abstract
An important significance of restructuring in power industry is the emergence of regulatory performance indices in the power distribution companies. Reward-penalty scheme is a direct control method that regulators use to assure the performance regulatory controls such as system reliability, service efficiency, and customer interruption cost. It is used as a financial tool designed to prevent the service reliability and efficiency deterioration of power distribution companies. Reward penalty scheme rewards the distribution company which provides good reliable power and penalizes those who act otherwise. In this paper, we propose a Cubic Reward-Penalty scheme, to improve the service reliability of power distribution companies. The novel feature of this scheme is the use of cubic reward/penalty formulation which varies in a cubic fashion based on the behavior of the performance-based reliability. In this paper, two methods of implementing Cubic Reward-Penalty scheme are explained: CRPS with no dead band and no reward/penalty capping and CRPS with dead band and reward/penalty capping. These proposed approaches are mainly intended for the regulators who are concerned about the customers affected by the outage duration. The significance of this research, lies in encouraging power distribution companies, to maintain, or even improve, customer service and satisfaction, by developing the Performance Regulatory Reward-Penalty schemes. This paper also provides most of the requirements and design rationale of Cubic Reward-Penalty Structure, its theoretical foundation and its prototype implementation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adefarati T, Bansal RC (2017) Reliability assessment of distribution system with the integration of renewable distributed generation. Appl Energy 185(January):158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.087
Ajodhia V, Hakvoort R (2005) Economic regulation of quality in electricity distribution networks. Utilities Policy 13(3):211–221
Ajodhia V, Schiavo LL, Malaman R (2006) Quality regulation of electricity distribution in Italy: an evaluation study. Energy Policy 34(13):1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.11.016
Allan RN (2013) Reliability evaluation of power systems. Springer, New York
Alvehag K, Awodele K (2014) Impact of Reward and penalty scheme on the incentives for distribution system reliability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(1):386–394
Alvehag K, Söder L (2010) Financial risk assessment for distribution system operators regulated by quality regulation. In: IEEE, pp 475–480
Alvehag K, Söder L (2011) Risk-based method for distribution system reliability investment decisions under performance-based regulation. Gener Transm Distrib IET 5(10):1062–1072
Alvehag K, Söder L (2012) Quality regulation impact on investment decisions in distribution system reliability. In: 2012 9th international conference on the European Energy Market, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254646
Alvehag K, Söder L (2012) Comparison of cost models for estimating customer interruption costs. In: Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), Istanbul, Turkey
Bertling L, Allan R, Eriksson R (2005) A reliability-centered asset maintenance method for assessing the impact of maintenance in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):75–82
Biewald B, Synapse Energy Economics (1997) Performance-based regulation in a restructured electric industry. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington DC
Billinton R, Pan Z (2002) Incorporating Reliability Index probability distributions in performance based regulation. In: IEEE, vol 1, pp 12–17
Billinton R, Pan Z (2004) Historic performance-based distribution system risk assessment. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(4):1759–1765
Billinton R, Wangdee W (2006) Utilizing bulk electric system reliability performance index probability distributions in a performance based regulation framework. In: IEEE, pp 1–6
Billinton R, Salvaderi L, McCalley JD, Chao H, Th Seitz RN, Allan JO, Fallon C (1997) Reliability issues in today’s electric power utility environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(4):1708–1714
Billinton R, Cui L, Pan Z (2002) Quantitative reliability considerations in the determination of performance-based rates and customer service disruption payments. In: IET, vol 149, pp 640–644
Božič D, Pantoš M (2013) Assessment of investment efficiency in a power system under performance-based regulation. Energy 51:330–338
Brown RE (2008) Electric power distribution reliability. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Brown RE (2009) Electric power distribution reliability. CRC press, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 40–114
Brown RE, Burke JJ (2000) Managing the risk of performance based rates. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):893–898
Chowdhury A, Koval D (2009) Standards for reregulated distribution utility. In: Power distribution system reliability: practical methods and applications. Wiley-IEEE Press, pp 317–335. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5396774
Council of European Energy Regulators (2015) CEER benchmarking Report 5.2 on the continuity of electricity supply. C14-EQS-62–03
da Silva AL, Nascimento LC, Guimarães ACR, Mello JCO (2010) Reliability indices applied to performance-based mechanisms in electric power distribution systems. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(2):105–112
Douglas JAK, Castro SF (2003) Setting of targets for continuity of supply through benchmarking. In: 17th international conference on electricity distribution, Barcelona
Farzin H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Moeini-Aghtaie M (2017) Reliability studies of modern distribution systems integrated with renewable generation and parking lots. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 8(1):431–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2598365
Fotuhi M, Shourkaei HM, Kharazi MB, Salimi A (2006) Reliability assessment of utilities using an enhanced reward-penalty model in performance based regulation system. In: IEEE, pp 1–6
Fumagalli E, Schiavo L, Delestre F (2007) Service quality regulation in electricity distribution and retail. Springer, New York
Ghasemi M, Dashti R (2018) Designing a decision model to assess the reward and penalty scheme of electric distribution companies. Energy 147(March):329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.021
IEEE Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices (2012) IEEE Std 1366-2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 1366-2003), May, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6209381
Jooshaki M, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Moeini-Aghtaie M, Ozdemir A (2014) A new reward-penalty mechanism for distribution companies based on concept of competition. In: IEEE, pp 1–5
Larimi SMM, Haghifam MR, Moradkhani A (2016) Risk-based reconfiguration of active electric distribution networks. Transm Distrib IET Gener 10(4):1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0777
Latify M, Seifi H, Mashhadi HR, Sheikh-El-Eslami MK (2013) Cobweb theory-based generation maintenance coordination in restructured power systems. Gener Transm Distrib IET 7(11):1253–1262
Li F (2005) Distributed processing of reliability index assessment and reliability-based network reconfiguration in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):230–238
Li W (2013) Reliability assessment of electric power systems using Monte Carlo methods. Springer, New York
Lotero RC, Contreras J (2011) Distribution system planning with reliability. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(4):2552–2562
Modarresi MS, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2012) Effective design of the reward-penalty schemes to reach the highest persuasiveness in selecting investment strategies by electric distribution utilities. In: IET conference proceedings. The Institution of Engineering & Technology. http://search.proquest.com/openview/8ceb8ee32c9a215a2cf0c3284d418f20/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1936365
Moeini-Aghtaie M, Farzin H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Amrollahi R (2017) Generalized analytical approach to assess reliability of renewable-based energy hubs. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(1):368–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2549747
Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2010) Impact of penalty-reward mechanism on the performance of electric distribution systems and regulator budget. Gener Transm Distrib IET 4(7):770–779
Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2011) Principal requirements of designing the reward-penalty schemes for reliability improvement in distribution systems. In: Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Electricity Distribution (CIRED2011), Frankfurt, Germany
Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Billinton R (2011a) Integration of clustering analysis and reward/penalty mechanisms for regulating service reliability in distribution systems. Gener Transm Distrib IET 5(11):1192–1200
Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Abiri-Jahromi A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2011b) Incorporating service quality regulation in distribution system maintenance strategy. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(4):2495–2504
Moradkhani A, Haghifam MR, Abedi SM (2015) Risk-based maintenance scheduling in the presence of reward penalty scheme. Electr Power Syst Res 121:126–133
Mostaghim N, Haghifam, Simab M (2017) Regulation of electrical distribution companies via efficiency assessments and reward-penalty scheme. J Oper Autom Power Eng 5(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.22098/joape.2017.546
Nikzad M, Mozafari B (2014) Reliability assessment of incentive- and priced-based demand response programs in restructured power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 56(March):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.10.007
Performance Incentives for Utilities | Synapse Energy (n.d.) Accessed May 31, 2016. http://www.synapse-energy.com/project/performance-incentives-utilities
Saboorideilami S, Abdi H (2014) Developing a new risk assessment methodology for distribution system operators regulated by quality regulation considering reclosing time. J Electr Eng Technol 9(4):1154–1162
Shiwen Y, Hui H, Chengzhi W, Hao G, Hao F (2017) Review on risk assessment of power system. In: Procedia computer science, 8th international conference on ambient systems, networks and technologies, ANT-2017 and the 7th international conference on sustainable energy information technology, SEIT 2017, 16–19 May 2017, Madeira, Portugal, vol 109 (January), pp 1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.399
Simab M, Haghifam MR (2012) Quality performance based regulation through designing reward and penalty scheme for electric distribution companies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43(1):539–545
Simab M, Alvehag K, Söder L, Haghifam M-R (2012) Designing reward and penalty scheme in performance based regulation for electric distribution companies. Gener Transm Distrib IET 6(9):893–901
Simab M, Chatrsimab S, Yazdi S, Simab A (2017) A new method for power system contingency ranking using combination of neural network and data envelopment analysis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(6):3859–3866. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-162169
Synapse Energy |. (n.d.) Accessed 15 Aug 2016. http://www.synapse-energy.com/
Tanure JE, Tahan CMV, Lima JM (2006) Establishing quality performance of distribution companies based on yardstick regulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(3):1148–1153
Wang J, Lu J, Bie Z, You S, Cao X (2014) Long-term maintenance scheduling of smart distribution system through a PSO-TS algorithm. J Appl Math 2014:694086. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/694086
Wangdee W (2005) Bulk electric system reliability simulation and application PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Xu N, Wen F, Huang M, Dong Z (2007) Optimal parameter setting of performance based regulation with reward and penalty. In: IEEE, pp 2740–2744
Yahav K, Oron G, Young W (2008) Reliability assessment and performance based incentives of power distribution systems. In: IEEE, pp 222–226
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sumesh, S., Potdar, V. & Krishna, A. Cubic reward penalty structure for power distribution companies. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10, 350–368 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00783-z
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00783-z