Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Evolution der Programmiersprachen der KI

  • Fachbeitrag
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Neben Prolog und Lisp als wichtigste historische Repräsentanten der Programmiersprachen der Künstlichen Intelligenz hat sich mit der Entwicklung neuer Schwerpunkte innerhalb der KI auch ein breites Spektrum an KI-Sprachen herausgebildet, darunter constraint-basierte Sprachen, Multiparadigmen-Sprachen, die Sprachen des Semantic Web, Planungssprachen, Agentensprachen, und Sprachen zum Einsatz in der Robotik. Wir skizzieren in diesem Übersichtsartikel einen Ausschnitt der historischen Entwicklung und geben eine Einführung für diesen Themenschwerpunkt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Badica C, Budimac Z, Burkhard HD, Ivanovic M (2011) Software agents: languages, tools, platforms. Comput Sci Inf Syst 8(2):255–298

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumeister J, Seipel D (2005) Anfragesprachen für das Semantic Web. Inform-Spektrum 28(1):40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biggs G, MacDonald B (2003) A survey of robot programming systems. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on robotics and automation (CSIRO), Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bry F, Maluszynski J (Hrsg) (2009) Semantic techniques for the Web, the REWERSE perspective. Lecture notes in computer science, Bd 5500. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colmerauer A, Roussel P (1992) The birth of prolog. In: The second ACM SIGPLAN conference on history of programming languages, S 37–52

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hofstedt P (2011) Multiparadigm constraint programming languages. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Luger G (2008) Artificial intelligence: structures and strategies for complex problem solving, 6. Aufl. Alpha Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthy J (1960) Recursive functions of symbolic expressions and their computation by machine. Commun ACM 3(4):184–195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell SJ, Norvig P (2009) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 3. Aufl. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro EY (1989) The family of concurrent logic programming languages. ACM Comput Surv 21(3):413–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueda K (2006) Logic programming and concurrency: a personal perspective. The ALP NewsLetter 19(2). http://dtai.cs.kuleuven.be/projects/ALP/newsletter/may06/nav/articles/ueda/article.html. Last visited 2011-10-30

  12. Clojure. http://clojure.org/. Last visited 2011-10-30

  13. AI-HaskellWiki. http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/AI. Last visited 2011-10-30

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Programming Languages and Compiler Construction, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Postfach 101344, 03013, Cottbus, Germany

    Petra Hofstedt

Authors
  1. Petra Hofstedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Hofstedt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofstedt, P. Die Evolution der Programmiersprachen der KI. Künstl Intell 26, 11–13 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-011-0157-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-011-0157-0

Search

Navigation