Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting delay discounting from heterogeneous social media data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delay discounting, a behavioral measure of impulsivity, is often used to quantify the human tendency to choose a smaller, sooner reward (e.g., $1 today) over a larger, later reward ($2 tomorrow). Delay discounting and its relation to human decision-making is a hot topic in economics and behavior science since pitting the demands of long-term goals against short-term desires is among the most difficult tasks in human decision-making (Hirsh et al. in J Res Personal 42:1646, 2008). Previously, questionnaire-based surveys were used to assess someone’s delay discounting rate (DDR). In this research, we develop a computational model to automatically predict DDR from diverse types of social media data such as likes and posts. We explore different unsupervised feature learning methods to take advantage of a large amount of unsupervised social media data. Based on our evaluation, the best model learned from social media likes achieved 0.634 ROC AUC, which 18% better than the baseline model that did not use unsupervised feature learning. The best model learned from social media posts achieved 0.641 ROC AUC, which is 24% better than the baseline that did not use unsupervised feature learning. We also employed unsupervised feature fusion to combine heterogeneous user data such as likes and posts together to further improve system performance. The final combined model outperformed the baseline that did not use unsupervised feature learning by 30%. Finally, we conducted additional analysis to uncover interesting correlation patterns between a person’s social media behavior and his/her DDR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://github.com/abenton/wgcca.

References

  • Alessi S, Petry N (2003) Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behav Process 64(3):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade LF, Petry NM (2014) White problem gamblers discount delayed rewards less steeply than their african american and hispanic counterparts. Psychol Addict Behav 28(2):599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew G, Arora R, Bilmes JA, Livescu K (2013) Deep canonical correlation analysis. In: ICML, no 3, pp 1247–1255

  • Angeletos GM, Laibson D, Repetto A, Tobacman J, Weinberg S (2001) The hyperbolic consumption model: calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. J Econ Perspect 15(3):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayduk O, Mendoa-Denton R, Mischel W, Downey G, Peake P, Rodriguez M (2000) Regulating the interpresonal self: strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Personal Soc Psychol 79(5):776–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroni M, Dinu G, Kruszewski G (2014) Don’t count, predict! a systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. In: ACL, no 1, pp 238–247

  • Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P (2013) Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(8):1798–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton A, Arora R, Dredze M (2016) Learning multiview embeddings of Twitter users. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, vol 2, pp 14–19

  • Bickel WK, Marsch LA (2001) Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction 96(1):73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146(4):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C (2011) Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biological psychiatry 69(3):260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(Jan):993–1022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri K, Kakade SM, Livescu K, Sridharan K (2009) Multi-view clustering via canonical correlation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. ACM, pp 129–136

  • Chen J, Hsieh G, Mahmud J, Nichols J (2014) Understanding individuals’ personal values from social media word use. In: Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW ’14, Baltimore, MD, USA, 15–19 February, 2014, pp 405–414

  • Chirumbolo A, Leone L (2010) Personality and politics: the role of the hexaco model of personality in predicting ideology and voting. Personal Individ Differ 49(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppersmith G, Dredze M, Harman C, Hollingshead K, Mitchell M (2015) Clpsych 2015 shared task: Depression and ptsd on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology: from linguistic signal to clinical reality, pp 31–39

  • De Choudhury M, Gamon M, Counts S, Horvitz E (2013) Predicting depression via social media. In: ICWSM, vol 13, pp 1–10

  • De Lathauwer L, De Moor B, Vandewalle J (2000) A multilinear singular value decomposition. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 21(4):1253–1278

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li LJ, Li K, Fei-Fei L (2009) ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: CVPR09

  • Ding T, Bickel WK, Pan S (2017) Multi-view unsupervised user feature embedding for social media-based substance use prediction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2275–2284

  • Ding T, Bickel W, Pan S (2017) Multi-view unsupervised user feature embedding for social media-based substance use prediction. In: EMNLP, pp 2275–2284

  • Ding T, Pan S (2016) Personalized emphasis framing for persuasive message generation. In: EMNLP

  • Dixon MR, Marley J, Jacobs EA (2003) Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. J Appl Behav Anal 36(4):449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Green L, Myerson J (2002) Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Rec 52(4):479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estle SJ, Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD (2007) Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psychol Sci 18(1):58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field M, Christiansen P, Cole J, Goudie A (2007) Delay discounting and the alcohol stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction 102(4):579–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giota KG, Kleftaras G (2013) The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites in greece. Cyberpsychol J Psychosoc Res Cybersp 7(3):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Delton AW, Robertson TE (2011) The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach. J Person Soc Psychol 100(6):1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardoon DR, Szedmak S, Shawe-Taylor J (2004) Canonical correlation analysis: an overview with application to learning methods. Neural Comput 16(12):2639–2664

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh J, Morisano D, Peterson J (2008) Adelay discounting: interactions between personality and cognitive ability. J Res Personal 42(6):1646–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaroni JL, Wright SM, Lerman C, Epstein LH (2004) Relationship between education and delay discounting in smokers. Addict Behav 29(6):1171–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing L, Tian Y (2019) Self-supervised visual feature learning with deep neural networks: a survey. CoRR arXiv:abs/1902.06162

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2002) Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Exp Anal Behav 77(2):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K (1997) Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Exp Psychol Gen 126(1):54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen 128(1):78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Graepel T (2013) Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(15):5802–5805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski M, Matz SC, Gosling SD, Popov V, Stillwell D (2015) Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. Am Psychol 70(6):543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Daumé H (2011) A co-training approach for multi-view spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11), pp 393–400

  • Lawrence JB, Stanford MS (1999) Impulsivity and time of day: effects on performance and cognitive tempo. Personal Individ Differ 25:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Le QV, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: ICML ,vol 14, pp 1188–1196

  • Liao L, He X, Zhang H, Chua TS (2018) Attributed social network embedding. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(12):2257–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Preotiuc-Pietro D, Samani Z, Moghaddam M, Ungar L (2016) Analyzing personality through social media profile picture choice. In: ICWSM, pp 211–220

  • Loewenstein G, Elster J (1992) Choice over time. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden G, Ewan E, Lagorio C (2007) Toward an animal model of gambling: delay discounting and the allure of unpredictable outcomes. J Gambl Studi 23(1):63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalingam V, Stillwell D, Kosinski M, Rust J, Kogan A (1992) Who can wait for the future? A personality perspective. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2(3):397–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail N, Koffarnus WKB (2014) A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: accurate discount rates in less than 60 seconds. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 22:222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781

  • Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3111–3119

  • Mischel W, Ebbesen E, Raskoff Zeiss A (1972) Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Personal Soc Psychol 21(2):204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguzez M (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Banion S, Birnbaum L (2013) Using explicit linguistic expressions of preference in social media to predict voting behavior. In: ASONAM. IEEE, pp 207–214

  • Park G, Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Kosinski M, Stillwell DJ, Ungar LH, Seligman ME (2015) Automatic personality assessment through social media language. J Personal Soc Psychol 108(6):934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995) Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clinl Psychol 51(6):768–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennacchiotti M, Popescu A (2011) A machine learning approach to twitter user classification. In: ICWSM, vol 11, no 1, pp 281–288

  • Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME (2007) Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc [computer software]. Austin, TX: www.liwc.net

  • Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D (1991) Subjective-probability and delay. J Exp Anal Behav 55(2):233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargin ME, Erzin E, Yemez Y, Tekalp AM (2006) Multimodal speaker identification using canonical correlation analysis. In: Acoustics, speech and signal processing, 2006. ICASSP 2006 proceedings. 2006 IEEE International Conference on, vol 1. IEEE, pp I–I

  • Saville BK, Gisbert A, Kopp J, Telesco C (2010) Internet addiction and delay discounting in college students. Psychol Rec 60(2):273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlam T, Wilson N, Shoda Y, Mischel W, Ayduk O (2013) Preschoolers’ delay of gratification predicts their body mass 30 years later. Pediatrics 162:90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Dziurzynski L, Ramones SM, Agrawal M, Shah A, Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Seligman ME et al (2013) Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach. PloS ONE 8(9):e73791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Dziurzynski L, Ramones SM, Agrawal M, Shah A, Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Seligman ME et al (2013) Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach. PloS ONE 8(9):e73791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamosh NA, Gray JR (2008) Delay discounting and intelligence: a meta-analysis. Intelligence 36(4):289–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Kumar A, Daume H, Jacobs DW (2012) Generalized multiview analysis: a discriminative latent space. In: 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 2160–2167

  • Stanford MS, Mathias CW, Dougherty DM, Lake S, Anderson NE, Patton JH (2009) Fifty years of the barratt impulsiveness scale: an update and 31 review. Personal Individl Differ 47:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell DJ, Tunney RJ (2012) Effects of measurement methods on the relationship between smoking and delay reward discounting. Addiction 107(5):1003–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trunk GV (1979) A problem of dimensionality: a simple example. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI–1(3):306–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedula N, Parthasarathy S (2017) Emotional and linguistic cues of depression from social media. In: Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on digital health. ACM, pp 127–136

  • Weller RE, C EW III, Avsar KB, Cox JE (2008) Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite 51(3):563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Pan S, Mahmud J, Yang H, Srinivasan P (2015) Using personal traits for brand preference prediction. In: EMNLP, pp 86–96

  • Yano T, Cohen WW, Smith NA (2009) Predicting response to political blog posts with topic models. In: Proceedings of human language technologies: the 2009 annual conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 477–485

  • Youyou W, Kosinski M, Stillwell D (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. In: Proceedings Of the national academy of sciences (PNAS)

  • Zhang Z, Yang H, Bu J, Zhou S, Yu P, Zhang J, Ester M, Wang C (2018) ANRL: attributed network representation learning via deep neural networks. In: IJCAI

  • Zhang D, Yin J, Zhu X, Zhang C (2017) User profile preserving social network embedding. In: IJCAI

  • Zhou B, Lapedriza A, Xiao J, Torralba A, Oliva A (2014) Learning deep features for scene recognition using places database. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on neural information processing systems - Volume 1, NIPS’14, pp 487–495

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimei Pan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, T., Bickel, W.K. & Pan, S. Predicting delay discounting from heterogeneous social media data. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 9, 27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0574-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0574-x

Keywords

Navigation