Abstract
Studying segregation between populations of different ages, ethnicities and social classes has been a prominent theme for at least half a century. To measure segregation, past works often use governmental surveys due to the scarcity of reliable data. In this work, we used call data records (CDR) provided by one of the largest mobile operators in Estonia, for studying segregation behavior based on gender, age, language and county. We consider commonly used Freeman’s segregation index for measuring segregation. Our findings suggest that (1) Gender: gender segregation exists in Estonia and its traces are visible in individuals calling hours, connectivity among age-groups, preferred language of communication, calling county and at the workplace; (2) Age: the prime working individuals (i.e., (25–54) age-group) and elderly (i.e., (64–100) age-group) are more segregated; and (3) Language: Estonian-speaking and Russian-speaking individuals are segregated based on language.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Our dataset is partly location data, and it cannot be shared due to privacy concerns. Additionally, despite the fact that the dataset is anonymized at two levels, there is still a small chance that specific persons can be identified. The dataset is owned by our university lab and is accessible for research purposes after signing the NDA (non-disclosure agreement).
Notes
http://pub.stat.ee/
https://www.sm.ee/
References
Ahas R (2005) Ülar Mark: Location based services-new challenges for planning and public administration? Futures 37(6):547–561
Ahas R, Aasa A, Roose A, Mark Ü, Silm S (2008) Evaluating passive mobile positioning data for tourism surveys: an estonian case study. Tour Manage 29(3):469–486
Ahas R, Silm S, Järv O, Saluveer E, Tiru M (2010) Using mobile positioning data to model locations meaningful to users of mobile phones. J Urban Technol 17(1):3–27
Allen JP, Turner E (2012) Black-white and hispanic-white segregation in us counties. Prof Geogr 64(4):503–520
Azhdari A, Sasani MA, Soltani A (2018) Exploring the relationship between spatial driving forces of urban expansion and socioeconomic segregation: the case of shiraz. Habitat Int 81:33–44
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis, vol. 413. Longman Scientific & Technical Essex
Blumenstock J, Fratamico L ((2013)) Social and spatial ethnic segregation: a framework for analyzing segregation with large-scale spatial network data. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual symposium on computing for development, pp. 1–10
Blumen O, Zamir I (2001) Two social environments in a working day: occupation and spatial segregation in metropolitan tel aviv. Environ Plan A 33(10):1765–1784
Boris P, Yifu Lin J (2008) Annual World Bank conference on development economics 2008, regional higher education and development, The World Bank, Washington
Bousfield J (2011) The rough guide to Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania, Dorling Kindersley Ltd., London
Carlsson M, Rooth DO (2007) Evidence of ethnic discrimination in the swedish labor market using experimental data. Labour Econ 14(4):716–729
Chernov S (2012) Tartu: Estonia’s intellectual and theater capital. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2012/12/23/tartu-estonias-intellectual-and-theater-capital-a20396
Dawkins CJ (2004) Measuring the spatial pattern of residential segregation. Urban Studies 41(4):833–851
Deville P, Linard C, Martin S, Gilbert M, Stevens FR, Gaughan AE, Blondel VD, Tatem AJ (2014) Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data 111(45):15888–15893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408439111
Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am Sociol Rev 20(2):210–217
Eagle N, Pentland AS, Lazer D (2008) Mobile phone data for inferring social network structure. In: Liu H, Salerno JJ, Young MJ (eds) Social computing, behavioral modeling, and prediction. Springer, Boston, pp 79–88
Estonia S (2012) Mean annual population by sex and age group. https://www.stat.ee/esms-metadata?code=30205
Farley R, Frey WH (1994) Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: small steps toward a more integrated society. Am Soc Rev, pp 23–45
Freeman LC (1978) Segregation in social networks. Sociol Methods Res 6(4):411–429
Ghahramani M, Zhou M, Hon CT (2018) Extracting significant mobile phone interaction patterns based on community structures. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20(3):1031–1041
Ghosh A, Monsivais D, Bhattacharya K, Dunbar RI, Kaski K (2019) Quantifying gender preferences in human social interactions using a large cellphone dataset. EPJ Data Sci 8(1):9
Goel R, Sharma R (2020) Mobility based sir model for pandemics–with case study of covid-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13015
Goel R, Singh A, Ghanbarnejad F (2019) Modeling competitive marketing strategies in social networks. Physica A 518:50–70
Goel R, Sharma R, Aasa A (2021) Understanding gender segregation through call data records: an estonian case study. PLoS ONE 16(3). 10.1371/journal.pone.0248212
Gonzalez MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabasi AL (2008) Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453(7196):779–782
Harris R (2016) Measuring segregation as a spatial optimisation problem, revisited: a case study of london, 1991–2011. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 30(3):474–493
Hewstone M, Cairns E, Voci A, Paolini S, McLernon F, Crisp RJ, Niens U, Craig J (2005) Intergroup contact in a divided society: challenging segregation in northern ireland. The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion, pp 265–292
Hiir H, Sharma R, Aasa A, Saluveer E (2019) Impact of natural and social events on mobile call data records–an estonian case study. In: International conference on complex networks and their applications. Springer, pp 415–426
Isaacman S, Becker R, Cáceres R, Martonosi M, Rowland J, Varshavsky A, Willinger W (2012) Human mobility modeling at metropolitan scales. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services, MobiSys ’12, pp 239–252. ACM, New York, NY, USA
Jin B, Pena JF (2010) Mobile communication in romantic relationships: Mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles. Commun Rep 23(1):39–51
Johnston R, Poulsen M, Forrest J (2004) The comparative study of ethnic residential segregation in the USA, 1980–2000. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 95(5):550–569
Leo Y, Fleury E, Alvarez-Hamelin JI, Sarraute C, Karsai M (2016) Socioeconomic correlations and stratification in social-communication networks. J R Soc Interface 13(125):20160598
Meister M, Niebuhr A (2020) Comparing ethnic segregation across cities—measurement issues matter. Rev Regional Res
Mets M, Raudsepp R (2013) Baltic piling. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Morey JN, Gentzler AL, Creasy B, Oberhauser AM, Westerman D (2013) Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Comput Hum Behav 29(4):1771–1778
Morrill R (1991) On the measure of geographic segregation. In: Geography research forum, vol 11, pp 25–36
Nordisch.info https://www.nordisch.info/estland/. Accessed: 20 03 2021
Oliver JE (1999) The effects of metropolitan economic segregation on local civic participation. Am J Political Sci pp 186–212
Onnela JP, Saramäki J, Hyvönen J, Szabó G, Lazer D, Kaski K, Kertész J, Barabási AL (2007) Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:7332–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610245104
Ponieman N, Sarraute C, Minnoni M, Travizano M, Rodriguez Zivic P, Salles A (2015) Mobility and sociocultural events in mobile phone data records. Ai Commun 29, 77–86
Quillian L (2002) Why is black-white residential segregation so persistent?: Evidence on three theories from migration data. Soc Sci Res 31(2):197–229
Romei A, Ruggieri S, Turini F ((2012) Discovering gender discrimination in project funding. In: 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on data mining workshops, pp 394–401. IEEE
Santiago M (2019) A framework for an interdisciplinary understanding of mexican american school segregation. Multicult Educ Rev 11(2):69–78
Silm S, Ahas R (2014) The temporal variation of ethnic segregation in a city: evidence from a mobile phone use dataset. Soc Sci Res 47:30–43
Simon P (2005) The measurement of racial discrimination: the policy use of statistics. Int Soc Sci J 57(183):9–25
Song C, Qu Z, Blumm N, Barabási AL (2010) Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327(5968):1018–1021
Statistics estonia https://andmed.stat.ee/et/stat. Accessed: 20 03 2021
Ward JB, Albrecht SS, Robinson WR, Pence BW, Maselko J, Haan MN, Aiello AE (2018) Neighborhood language isolation and depressive symptoms among elderly us latinos. Ann Epidemiol 28(11):774–782
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications, vol 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
White MJ (1983) The measurement of spatial segregation. Am J Sociol 88(5):1008–1018
Wong DW (1993) Spatial indices of segregation. Urban Stud 30(3)
Wong DW (1999) Geostatistics as measures of spatial segregation. Urban Geogr 20(7):635–647
Wong DW (2002) Modeling local segregation: a spatial interaction approach. Geogr Environ Model 6(1):81–97
Funding
This research was funded by Estonian Research Council Institutional Research grant PUT PRG306 and ERDF via the IT Academy Research Programme, and H2020 framework project, SoBigData++ and CHIST-ERA project SAI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Code availability
Not applicable. This work utilizes a non-shareable dataset.
Authors’ contributions
Rahul Goel performed formal analysis, investigation, validation, visualization and writing— original draft. Rajesh Sharma contributed to supervision and writing—review and editing. Anto Aasa performed data curation and formal analysis.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goel, R., Sharma, R. & Aasa, A. Studying segregation in Estonia using call data records. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11, 98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00817-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00817-0