Skip to main content
Log in

Vine copula classifiers for the mind reading problem

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Progress in Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we introduce vine copulas to model probabilistic dependencies in supervised classification problems. Vine copulas allow the representation of the dependence structure of multidimensional distributions as a factorization of bivariate pair-copulas. The flexibility of this model lies in the fact that we can mix different types of pair-copulas in a factorization, which allows covering a wide range of types of dependencies, i.e., from independence to much more complex forms of bivariate correlations. This property motivates us to use vine copulas as classifiers, particularly for problems for which the type and strength of bivariate interactions between the variables show a great variability. This is the case of brain signal classification problems where information is represented as multiple time series, each one recorded from different brain region. Our experimental results on a real-word Mind Reading Problem reveal that vine copula-based classifiers perform competitively compared to the four best classification methods presented at the Mind Reading Challenge Competition 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aas, K., Czado, C., Frigessi, A., Bakken, H.: Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur.: Math. Econ. 44(2), 182–198 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedford, T., Cooke, R.M.: Probability density decomposition for conditionally dependent random variables modeled by vines. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 245–268 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedford, T., Cooke, R.M.: Vines—a new graphical model for dependent random variables. Ann. Stat. 30(4), 1031–1068 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg, D., Aas, K.: Models for construction of higher-dimensional dependence: a comparison study. Eur. J. Fin. 15, 639–659 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blankertz, B., Curio, G., Muller, K.-R.: Classifying single trial EEG: towards brain computer interfacing. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 1, 157–164 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czado, C.: Pair-copula constructions of multivariate copulas. In: Jaworski, P., Durante, F., Härdle, W.K., Rychlik, T. (eds.) Copula Theory and Its Applications, Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 198, pp. 94–111. Springer (2010). ISBN 978-3-642-12464-8

  7. Dissmann, J.F., Brechmann, E.C., Czado, C. Kurowicka, D.: Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returns. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 59 (2013): 52–69 (2012)

  8. Elidan, G.: Copula bayesian networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 559–567 (2010)

  9. Frey, B.J., Dueck, D.: Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Garrett, D., Peterson, D.A., Anderson, C.W., Thaut, M.H.: Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11(2), 141–144 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Genest, C., Favre, A.C.: Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J. Hydrol. Eng. 12(4), 347–368 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Genest, C., Rémillard, B.: Validity of the parametric bootstrap for goodness-of-fit testing in semiparametric models. Annales de l’IHP Probabilités et statistiques 44, 1096–1127 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Haselsteiner, E., Pfurtscheller, G.: Using time-dependent neural networks for EEG classification. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8(4), 457–463 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huttunen, H., Kauppi, J.-P., Tohka, J.: Regularized logistic regression for mind reading with parallel validation. In: Proceedings of ICANN/PASCAL2 Challenge: MEG Mind-Reading, pp. 20–24 (2011)

  15. Huttunen, H., Manninen, T., Kauppi, J.-P., Tohka, J.: Mind reading with regularized multinomial logistic regression. Mach. Vis. Appl. 24(6), 1311–1325 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Joe, H.: Families of \(m\)-variate distributions with given margins and \(m(m-1)/2\) bivariate dependence parameters. In: Rüschendorf, L., Schweizer, B., Taylor, M.D. (eds.) Distributions with Fixed Marginals and Related Topics, pp. 120–141 (1996)

  17. Joe, H.: Asymptotic efficiency of the two-stage estimation method for the copula-based models. J. Multivar. Anal. 94(2), 401–419 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Joe, H., Xu, J.J.: The estimation method of inference functions for margins for multivariate models. Technical report 166, University of British Columbia (1996)

  19. Jylänki, P., Riihimäki, J., Vehtari, A.: Multi-class gaussian process classification of single trial MEG based on frequency specific latent features extracted with binary linear classifiers. In: Proceedings of ICANN/PASCAL2 Challenge: MEG Mind-Reading, pp. 31–34 (2011)

  20. Klami, A., Ramkumar, P., Virtanen, S., Parkkonen, L., Hari, R., Kaski, S.: ICANN/PASCAL2 challenge: MEG mind reading. Overview and results. In: Klami, A. (ed.) Proceedings of ICANN/PASCAL2 Challenge: MEG Mind Reading, Aalto University Publication series SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY, pp. 3–19. Aalto University (2011)

  21. Lebedev, M.A., Nicolelis, M.A.L.: Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. TRENDS Neurosci. 29(9), 536–546 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lecuyer, A., Lamarche, F., Arnaldi, B.: A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces. J. Neural Eng. 4, R1–R13 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naselaris, T., Kay, K.N., Nishimoto, S., Gallant, J.L.: Encoding and decoding in fMRI. Neuroimage 56(2), 400–410 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelsen, R.B.: An Introduction to Copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Olivetti, E., Kia, S.M., Avesani, P.: MEG decoding across subjects. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, pp. 1–4 (2014)

  26. Rakotomamonjy, A., Guigue, V.: BCI competition III: dataset II-ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 speller. Biomed. Eng. IEEE Trans. 55(3), 1147–1154 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramoser, H., Muller-Gerking, J., Pfurtscheller, G.: Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. Rehabil. Eng. IEEE Trans. 8(4), 441–446 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rasmussen, C.E., Williams, C.K.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, Boston (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Rieger, J.W., Reichert, C., Gegenfurtner, K.R., Noesselt, T., Braun, C., Heinze, H.J., Kruse, R., Hinrichs, H.: Predicting the recognition of natural scenes from single trial MEG recordings of brain activity. Neuroimage 42(3), 1056–1068 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Romano, C.: Calibrating and simulating copula functions: an application to the italian stock market. Working paper 12, Centro Interdipartimale sul Diritto e l’Economia dei Mercati (2002)

  31. Rosenkrantz, D.J., Stearns, R.E., Lewis II, P.M.: An analysis of several heuristics for the traveling salesman problem. SIAM J. Comput. 6(3), 563–581 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Salinas-Gutiérrez, R., Hernández-Aguirre, A., Rivera-Meraz, M.J.J., Villa-Diharce, E.R. Supervised probabilistic classification based on Gaussian copulas. In: Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 104–115. Springer (2010)

  33. Salinas-Gutiérrez, R., Hernández-Aguirre, A., Villa-Diharce, E.: Estimation of distribution algorithms based on copula functions. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2011), pp. 795–798 (2011)

  34. Santana, R., Bielza, C., Larrañaga, P.: An ensemble of classifiers approach with multiple sources of information. In: Klami, A. (ed.) Proceedings of ICANN/PASCAL2 Challenge: MEG Mind Reading, Aalto University Publication series SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY, pp. 25–30. Aalto University (2011)

  35. Santana, R., Bielza, C., Larrañaga, P.: Regularized logistic regression and multi-objective variable selection for classifying MEG data. Biol. Cybern. 106(6–7), 389–405 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Shimodaira, H.: Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 90(2), 227–244 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Sklar, A.: Fonctions de repartition à \(n\) dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Universite de Paris 8, 229–231 (1959)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113(6), 767–791 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the Basque Government (IT609-13 and Elkartek), and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO (TIN2013-41272P). Jose A. Lozano is also supported by BERC 2014-2017 and Elkartek programs (Basque government) and Severo Ochoa Program SEV-2013-0323 (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Carrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carrera, D., Santana, R. & Lozano, J.A. Vine copula classifiers for the mind reading problem. Prog Artif Intell 5, 289–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-016-0095-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-016-0095-z

Keywords

Navigation