Skip to main content
Log in

Progress and conservation under Rawls's maximin principle

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

I argue the compatibility of progress with Rawls's maximin principle when applied to individual utility functions which are “nonaltruistic” in the sense that any transfer of consumption goods from old to young (resp. from young to old) lowers (resp. increases) old people's utility. The paper shows that necessary conditions for that compatibility are: (A) a bound on the feasible transfers from young to old, and (B) a positive intergenerational stock externality. The analysis implies that the maximin principle has the drawback of making, under mild assumptions, conservation incompatible with progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 15 December 1999/Accepted: 17 April 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silvestre, J. Progress and conservation under Rawls's maximin principle. Soc Choice Welfare 19, 1–27 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s355-002-8323-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s355-002-8323-z

Keywords

Navigation