Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the Use of Soft Computing Methods in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Research: a Review of Years 2010–2018

  • ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to survey recent research publications that use Soft Computing methods to answer education-related problems based on the analysis of educational data ‘mined’ mainly from interactive/e-learning systems. Such systems are known to generate and store large volumes of data that can be exploited to assess the learner, the system and the quality of the interaction between them. Educational Data Mining (EDM) and Learning Analytics (LA) are two distinct and yet closely related research areas that focus on this data aiming to address open education-related questions or issues. Besides ‘classic’ data analysis methods such as clustering, classification, identification or regression/analysis of variances, soft computing methods are often employed by EDM and LA researchers to achieve their various tasks. Their very nature as iterative optimization algorithms that avoid the exhaustive search of the solutions space and go for possibly suboptimal solutions yet at realistic time and effort, along with their heavy reliance on rich data sets for training, make soft computing methods ideal tools for the EDM or LA type of problems. Decision trees, random forests, artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, support vector machines and genetic/evolutionary algorithms are a few examples of soft computing approaches that, given enough data, can successfully deal with uncertainty, qualitatively stated problems and incomplete, imprecise or even contradictory data sets – features that the field of education shares with all humanities/social sciences fields. The present review focuses, therefore, on recent EDM and LA research that employs at least one soft computing method, and aims to identify (i) the major education problems/issues addressed and, consequently, research goals/objectives set, (ii) the learning contexts/settings within which relevant research and educational interventions take place, (iii) the relation between classic and soft computing methods employed to solve specific problems/issues, and (iv) the means of dissemination (publication journals) of the relevant research results. Selection and analysis of a body of 300 journal publications reveals that top research questions in education today seeking answers through soft computing methods refer directly to the issue of quality – a critical issue given the currently dominant educational/pedagogical models that favor e-learning or computer- or technology-mediated learning contexts. Moreover, results identify the most frequently used methods and tools within EDM/LA research and, comparatively, within their soft computing subsets, along with the major journals relevant research is being published worldwide. Weaknesses and issues that need further attention in order to fully exploit the benefits of research results to improve both the learning experience and the learning outcomes are discussed in the conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. A. (1995). An introduction to neural networks. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K. E. (2010). Signals: Applying academic analytics. Educause Quarterly, 33(1), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, V., Sharma, R. (2018). “Smart Education with artificial intelligence based determination of learning styles”. Procedia Computer Science 132, (pp. 834–842), International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Science (ICCIDS 2018), Elsevier.

  • Baker, R. S. (2010). Data mining for education. In B. McGaw, P. Peterson, & E. Baker (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 112–118). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonissone, P. P. (1997). Soft computing: The convergence of emerging reasoning technologies. Soft Computing, 1(1), 6–18.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, A., & Rodriguez, L. P. (2017). Learning analytics in 21st century education: A review. Ensaio, 25(97), 971–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H. M., & Gray, P. (1999). Special section: Data mining. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(1), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Cole, J. R., & Persichitte, K. A. (2000). Fuzzy cognitive mapping: Applications in education. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 15, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Powell, S., Yuan, L., & MacNeill, S. (2013). Survey of the state of analytics in UK HE and FE institutions. CETIS White Paper, S/N, 2013, WP03 available at http://publications.cetis.org.uk/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Analytics to literacies: The development of a learning analytics framework for multiliteracies assessment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 284–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., Joksimovic, S. (2014). “Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field”, In Proceedings of the 4th Intl. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Indianapolis, USA.

  • Dewey, J. (1964). The need for a philosophy on education: John Dewey on education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drigas, A. S., Argyri, K., & Vrettaros, J. (2009). Decade review (1999-2009): Artificial intelligence techniques in student modeling. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 49, 552–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1998). Soft computing, fuzzy logic, and artificial intelligence. Soft Computing, 2, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, A., Ismail, M. A., & Herawan, T. A. (2017). Systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access, 5(7820050), 15991–16005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, G., Nápoles, G., Falcon, R., Froelich, W., Vanhoof, K., Bello, R. (2017). “A review on methods and software for fuzzy cognitive maps”, Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–31.

  • Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosnot, C. (1996). “Constructivism: A Psychological theory of learning”, Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, C. Fosnot, Ed., New York: Teachers College Press, 8–33.

  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glykas, M. (2010). Fuzzy cognitive maps: Advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Groumpos, P. P. (2016). Deep learning vs. wise learning: A critical and challenging overview. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(29), 180–189.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S.S. (1999). Neural Network - A Comprehensive Foundation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

  • Kecman, V. (2001). Learning and soft computing. The MIT Press: Bradford Books.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B.A. (2004). “Procedures for Undertaking Systematic Reviews”, Joint Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Keele University (TR/SE-0401) and National ICT Australia Ltd. (0400011T.1).

  • Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal on Man-Machine Studies, 24, 65–75.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, F., Gooley, A. (2001). Innovation in Open & Distance Learning: Successful Development of Online and Web-based Learning. Psychology Press.

  • Lykourentzou, I., Giannoukos, I., Nikolopoulos, V., Mpardis, G., & Loumos, V. (2009). Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Computers & Education, 53, 950–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (Rev. ed.). Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, P., Dillenbourg, P. (1994). “Implementing a model of cognitive development in an intelligent learning environment”, Technology-based learning environments: Psychological and educational foundations, (pp. 72–78), S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte and H. Mandl, eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Merçeron, A. (2015). “Educational Data Mining / Learning Analytics: Methods, Tasks and Current Trends”, In Proceedings of 13th e-Learning Conference of the German Computer Society (DeLFI 2015) & DeLFI Workshop 2015, München, Germany.

  • Mitra, S., & Acharya, T. (2003). Data mining: Multimedia, soft computing, and bioinformatics. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandha Kumar, K. G., & Jayanthila Devi, A. (2017). Perspectives on educational data mining: A study. Man in India, 97(4), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pai, M., McCulloch, M., Colford, J. (2002). “Systematic Review: A Road Map Version 2.2”. Systematic Reviews Group, UC Berkeley, available at https://www.scribd.com/document/294591268/Diagnostic-Systematic-Reviews-Road-Map-V3 .

  • Papageorgiou, E. I., & Salmeron, J. L. (2013). A review of fuzzy cognitive maps research during the last decade. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21(1) no. 6208855, 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systemic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1987). Information technology and education: Computer criticism vs. Technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1990). Introduction: Constructionist Learning. Idit Harel, ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT media laboratory.

  • Papert, S. (1993). The Children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Ayala, A. (2014). “Educational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works”, Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4 part 1), 1432–1462.

  • Peña-Ayala, A. (2018). “Learning analytics: A glance of evolution, status, and trends according to a proposed taxonomy”, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8 (e1243).

  • Peña-Ayala, A., & Sossa-Azuela, H. (2013). Proactive sequencing based on a causal and fuzzy student model. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 17, 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Ayala, A., Sossa-Azuela, H., & Cervantes-Pérez, F. (2012). Predictive student model supported by fuzzy-causal knowledge and inference. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 4690–4709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. New York: Grossman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L., Collins, A. (1996). “Cognition and learning”, The International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology (pp. 48–54), T. Plomp & D. Ely, eds., 2nd ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Roll, I., & Wylie, R. L. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, I., Russell, D. M., & Gašević, D. (2018). Learning at scale. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28, 471–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6) no. 5524021, 601–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizky, M., & Baker, R. S. (2010). Handbook of Educational Data Mining. Data mining and knowledge discovery series. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S., Scott, B., Freeman, H., & Patel, D. (2013). The Virtual University: The internet and resource-based learning. Open and Flexible Learning Series: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saridakis, K. M., & Dentsoras, A. J. (2008). Soft computing in engineering design–A review. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(2), 202–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer, O., & McLaren, B. M. (2011). Educational data mining. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendimann, B. A., Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L. P., Boroujeni, M. S., Holzer, A., Gillet, D., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Perceiving learning at a glance: A systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1) no. 7542151, 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., Baker, R.S. (2012). “Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration” In: Proc. 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, (pp. 252–254), Vancouver, BA, Canada.

  • Terry, K., Cheney, A. (2016). Utilizing virtual and personal learning environments for optimal learning. IGI Global.

  • Turkle, S., Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices Within the Computer Culture: Constructionist Learning. Idit Harel, ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory.

  • Upadhya, M. S. (2012). Fuzzy logic based evaluation of performance of students in colleges. Journal of Computer Applications, 1, 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018). Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Computers in Education, 122, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3, 241–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, H. J. (2013). All about analytics. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 4(1), 1–16.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. S. (2013). The potentials of educational data Mining for Researching Metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1994). Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. Communications of the ACM, 37(3), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A., Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1996). Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic and fuzzy systems: Selected papers. Danvers, MA: World Scientific Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

Reviewed Papers

  • Abazeed, A., & Khder, M. (2017). A classification and prediction model for student's performance in university level. Journal of Computer Science, 13(7), 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdous, M., & He, W. (2011). Using text mining to uncover students' technology-related problems in live video streaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agaoglu, M. (2016) Predicting instructor performance using data mining techniques in higher education. IEEE Access, 4, art. no. 7469785, 2379–2387.

  • Ahadi, A., Hellas, A., Lister, R. (2017). A contingency table derived method for analyzing course data. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17 (3), art. no. 13 .

  • Ahmed, A. I. (2016). Big data for accreditation: A case study of Saudi universities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 91(1), 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akcapinar, G., & Bayazit, A. (2018). Investigating video viewing behaviors of students with different learning approaches using video analytics. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(4) art. no. 7, 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akçapinar, G., Altun, A., & Askar, P. (2015). Modeling students’ academic performance based on their interactions in an online learning environment. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 815–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandron, G., Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., Chen, Z., Munoz-Merino, P. J., & Pritchard, D. E. (2017). Copying@scale: Using harvesting accounts for collecting correct answers in a MOOC. Computers in Education, 108, 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, L., Hatala, M., Gašević, D., & Jovanović, J. (2012). A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool. Computers in Education, 58(1), 470–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, L., Asadi, M., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., & Hatala, M. (2013). Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study. Computers in Education, 62, 130–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • AlJarrah, A., Thomas, M.K., Shehab, M. (2018). Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,15 (1), no 1.

  • Almeda, M. V., Zuech, J., Utz, C., Higgins, G., Reynolds, R., & Baker, R. S. (2018). Comparing the factors that predict completion and grades among for-credit and open/mooc students in online learning. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almutairi, F. M., Sidiropoulos, N. D., & Karypis, G. (2017). Context-aware recommendation-based learning analytics using tensor and coupled matrix factorization. IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 11(5) art. no. 7931546, 729–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya, A. R., Luque, M., & Peinado, M. (2016). A visual recommender tool in a collaborative learning experience. Expert Systems with Applications, 45, 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, C., Howard, S. K., Ma, J., Yang, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Data mining in educational technology classroom research: Can it make a contribution? Computers in Education, 113, 226–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appalla, P., Kuthadi, V. M., & Marwala, T. (2017). An efficient educational data mining approach to support e-learning. Wireless Networks, 23(4), 1011–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, A. S., & Velmurugan, T. (2018). Analyzing student performance using evolutionary artificial neural network algorithm. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(2.26), 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asif, R., Merceron, A., Ali, S. A., & Haider, N. G. (2017). Analyzing undergraduate students' performance using educational data mining. Computers in Education, 113, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atta-Ur-Rahman, S., Aldhafferi, K., & Alqahtani, N. A. (2018). Educational data mining for enhanced teaching and learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(14), 4417–4427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, C., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2016). Cocreation and evaluation of inclusive and accessible open educational resources: A mapping toward the IMS caliper. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 11(3) art. no. 7516709, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachri, O.S., Kusnadi, Hatta, M., Nurhayati, O.D. (2017). Feature selection based on CHI square in artificial neural network to predict the accuracy of student study period. Intl. Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8 (8), 731–739.

  • Bagriyanik, S., & Karahoca, A. (2018). Using data mining to identify cosmic function point measurement competence. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8(6), 5253–5259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S., Clarke-Midura, J., & Ocumpaugh, J. (2016). Towards general models of effective science inquiry in virtual performance assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beemer, J., Spoon, K., Fan, J., Stronach, J., Frazee, J. P., Bohonak, A. J., & Levine, R. A. (2018a). Assessing instructional modalities: Individualized treatment effects for personalized learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beemer, J., Spoon, K., He, L., Fan, J., & Levine, R. A. (2018b). Ensemble learning for estimating individualized treatment effects in student success studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M., Davis, D., & Smith, C. P. (2015). AMOEBA: Designing for collaboration in computer science classrooms through live learning analytics. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 425–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezet, A., Duncan, T., & Litvin, K. (2018). Implementation and evaluation of online, synchronous research consultations for graduate students. Library Hi Tech News, 35(6), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharara, S., Sabitha, S., & Bansal, A. (2018). Application of learning analytics using clustering data Mining for Students’ disposition analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 957–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodily, R., Nyland, R., & Wiley, D. (2017). The RISE framework: Using learning analytics to automatically identify open educational resources for continuous improvement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(2), 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, D. G., Matlen, B. J., Timms, M. J., Gochyyev, P., Grillo-Hill, A., Luttgen, K., & Varfolomeeva, M. (2017). Modeling student learning behavior patterns in an online science inquiry environment. Technology. Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, C. G., Chiang, M., Jain, S., Lam, H., Liu, Z., & Wong, F. M. F. (2014). Learning about social learning in MOOCs: From statistical analysis to generative model. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(4) art. no. 6851916, 346–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers in Education, 75, 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2016). SMILI: A framework for interfaces to learning data in open learner models, learning analytics and related Fields. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 293–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos, C., Campanario, M. L., Peña, D. D. L., Lara, J. A., Lizcano, D., & Martínez, M. A. (2018). Data mining for modeling students’ performance: A tutoring action plan to prevent academic dropout. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 66, 541–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campagni, R., Merlini, D., Sprugnoli, R., & Verri, M. C. (2015). Data mining models for student careers. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(13), 5508–5521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, A. R., Fernández-Manjón, B., & García-Tejedor, Á. J. (2018). Using game learning analytics for validating the design of a learning game for adults with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(4), 659–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carceller, C., Dawson, S., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Improving academic outcomes: Does participating in online discussion forums payoff? International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(2), 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers in Education, 96, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo, R., Esteban, M., Sánchez-Santillán, M, Núñez, J.C. (2017). Procrastinating behavior in computer-based learning environments to predict performance: A case study in Moodle. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (AUG), art. no. 1403.

  • Chen, G. (2016). Recommendation method of educational resources under the big data environment. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 13(4), 2582–2587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Zhao, J. (2018). An educational data mining model for supervision of network learning process. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(11), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Chen, Y., & Oztekin, A. (2017a). A hybrid data envelopment analysis approach to analyse college graduation rate at higher education institutions. INFOR, 55(3), 188–210.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-C., Fu, X., & Chang, C.-Y. (2017b). A terms mining and clustering technique for surveying network and content analysis of academic groups exploration. Cluster Computing, 20(1), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Chang, Y.-H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018a). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Davis, D., Krause, M., Aivaloglou, E., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2018b). From learners to earners: Enabling MOOC learners to apply their skills and earn money in an online market place. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(2), 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., Lu, Y., Zheng, V. W., Chen, X., & Yang, B. (2018c). KnowEdu: A system to construct knowledge graph for education. IEEE Access, 6, 31553–31563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chigne, H. S., Gayo, J. E. L., Obeso, M. E. A., De Pablos, P. O., & Lovelle, J. M. C. (2016). Towards the implementation of the learning analytics in the social learning environments for the technology enhanced assessment in computer engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1637–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.-Y., Tseng, S.-F., Chih, W.-C., Chen, Z.-H., Chao, P.-Y., Robert Lai, K., Chan, C.-L., Yu, L.-C., Lin, Y.-L. (2015). Open student models of core competencies at the curriculum level: Using learning analytics for student reflection. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 99, no. 7335629.

  • Cobo, A., Rocha, R., & Rodríguez-Hoyos, C. (2014). Evaluation of the interactivity of students in virtual learning environments using a multicriteria approach and data mining. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1000–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conde, M. A., Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., Gomez-Aguilar, D.-A., & Theron, R. (2015). Exploring software engineering subjects by using visual learning analytics techniques. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 10(4) art. no. 7293149, 242–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conde, M. A., Colomo-Palacios, R., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Larrucea, X. (2018). Teamwork assessment in the educational web of data: A learning analytics approach towards ISO 10018. Telematics and Informatics, 35(3), 551–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., & Matzat, U. (2017). Predicting student performance from LMS data: A comparison of 17 blended courses using moodle LMS. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1) art. no. 7589022, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, H., Teng, M., Nafalski, A., & Nedic, Z. (2016). Recent developments in remote laboratory NetLab. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(1), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, E. B., Fonseca, B., Santana, M. A., de Araújo, F. F., & Rego, J. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2018). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions. Computers in Education, 116, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R., Nyland, R., Bodily, R., Chapman, J., Jones, B., & Young, J. (2017). Designing technology-enabled instruction to utilize learning analytics. TechTrends, 61(2), 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejaeger, K., Goethals, F., Giangreco, A., Mola, L., & Baesens, B. (2012). Gaining insight into student satisfaction using comprehensible data mining techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 548–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Puerto Paule-Ruiz, M., Riestra-Gonzalez, M., Sanchez-Santillan, M., & Perez-Perez, J. R. (2015). The procrastination related indicators in e-learning platforms. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delen, D. (2010). A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management. Decision Support Systems, 49(4), 498–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmarajan, K., & Dorairangaswamy, M. A. (2017). Discovering student e-learning preferred navigation paths using selection page and time preference algorithm. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(10), 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimić, G., Predić, B., Rančić, D., Petrović, V., Maček, N., & Spalević, P. (2018). Association analysis of moodle e-tests in blended learning educational environment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragulescu, B., Bucos, M., & Vasiu, R. (2015). Social network analysis on educational data set in RDF format. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 23(3), 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drlík, M., Švec, P., Kapusta, J., Munk, M., Noskova, T., Pavlova, T., Yakovleva, O., Morze, N., & Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2017). Identification of differences in university e-environment between selected EU and non-EU countries using knowledge mining methods: Project IRNet case study. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 13(2), 236–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duque, R., Gómez-Pérez, D., Nieto-Reyes, A., & Bravo, C. (2015). Analyzing collaboration and interaction in learning environments to form learner groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duzhin, F., Gustafsson, A. (2018). Machine learning-based app for self-evaluation of teacher-specific instructional style and tools. Education Sciences, 8 (1), no. 7.

  • Dzelzkaleja, L. (2018). Color code method design evaluation and data analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(2), 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, M., Edtstadler, K., & Ebner, M. (2018). Tutoring writing spelling skills within a web-based platform for children. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2), 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Mabrouk, M., Gaou, S., & Rtili, M. K. (2017). Towards an intelligent hybrid recommendation system for E-learning platforms using data mining. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(6), 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elaachak, L., Belahbibe, A., & Bouhorma, M. (2015). Towards a system of guidance, assistance and learning analytics based on multi agent system applied on serious games. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 5(2), 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • ElFangary, L. M. (2011). Mining of Egyptian missions data for shaping new paradigms. Education and Information Technologies, 16(2), 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhassan, A., Jenhani, I., & Brahim, G. B. (2018). Remedial actions recommendation via multi-label classification: A course learning improvement method. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 8(6), 583–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estevez-Ayres, I., Arias Fisteus, J., & Delgado-Kloos, C. L. (2017). A distributed stream-based infrastructure for the real-time gathering and analysis of heterogeneous educational data. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 100, 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estévez-Ayres, I., Arias Fisteus, J., Uguina-Gadella, L., Alario-Hoyos, C., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Uncovering flipped-classroom problems at an engineering course on systems architecture through data-driven learning design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(3), 865–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evale, D. S. (2017). Learning management system with prediction model and course-content recommendation module. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16(1), 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Á. (2015). Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, D.A., Kafai, Y.B., Giang, M.T. (2017). Youth computational participation in the wild: Understanding experience and equity in participating and programming in the online Scratch community. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17 (3), art. no. 15, .

  • Firat, M. (2016). Determining the effects of lms learning behaviors on academic achievement in a learning analytic perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, J., & Wong, K. T. Y. (2015). A personal assistant authoring e-book for e-learning in higher education using inverted files of hyperlinks. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 18(3), 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratamico, L., Conati, C., Kardan, S., & Roll, I. (2017). Applying a framework for student modeling in exploratory learning environments: Comparing data representation granularity to handle environment complexity. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(2), 320–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, T., & Dagli, C. (2016). MOOCs for research: The case of the Indiana University plagiarism tutorials and tests. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(2), 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulantelli, G., Taibi, D., & Arrigo, M. (2015). A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, M., & Van Diggelen, M. (2017). Feedback conversations: Creating feedback dialogues with a new textual tool for industrial design student feedback. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 12(4), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., & Joksimović, S. (2017). Effects of instructional conditions and experience on the adoption of a learning tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Aguilar, D. A., Hernández-García, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Therón, R. (2015). Tap into visual analysis of customization of grouping of activities in eLearning. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Rey, P., Fernández-Navarro, F., & Barberà, E. (2016). Ordinal regression by a gravitational model in the field of educational data mining. Expert Systems, 33(2), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda, S. M., Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Rossi, L. M. (2013). Towards automatically detecting whether student learning is shallow. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 23(1–4), 50–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünewald, F., & Meinel, C. (2015). Implementation and evaluation of digital E-lecture annotation in learning groups to Foster active learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(3) art. no. 7018078, 286–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy, M., Inan, A., Nergiz, M.E., Saygin, Y. (2016). Privacy-Preserving Learning Analytics: Challenges and Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 99, art. no. 7563858.

  • Hadioui, A., El Faddouli, N.-E., Touimi, Y. B., & Mohammed, S. B. (2017). Machine learning based on big data extraction of massive educational knowledge. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(11), 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, N., Richards, D., Jacobson, M.J. (2014). Academic performance in a 3D virtual learning environment: Different learning types vs. different class types. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8863, (p. 15).

  • Helal, S., Li, J., Liu, L., Ebrahimie, E., Dawson, S., Murray, D. J., & Long, Q. (2018). Predicting academic performance by considering student heterogeneity. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161, 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-García, Á., González-González, I., Jiménez-Zarco, A. I., & Chaparro-Peláez, J. (2015). Applying social learning analytics to message boards in online distance learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, A., & Nachmias, R. (2011). Online persistence in higher education web-supported courses. Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlosta, M., Zdrahal, Z., & Zendulka, J. (2018). Are we meeting a deadline? Classification goal achievement in time in the presence of imbalanced data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 160, 278–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffait, A.-S., & Schyns, M. (2017). Early detection of university students with potential difficulties. Decision Support Systems, 101, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M., Latham, A., Crockett, K., & O'Shea, J. D. (2018). Near real-time comprehension classification with artificial neural networks: Decoding e-learner non-verbal behavior. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, P. A. (2017). Using course-subject co-occurrence (CSCO) to reveal the structure of an academic discipline: A framework to evaluate different inputs of a domain map. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 182–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Z., Bumbacher, E., Brauneis, A., Diaz, M., Saltarelli, A., Blikstein, P., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2018). Design guidelines and empirical case study for scaling authentic inquiry-based science learning via open online courses and interactive biology cloud labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 478–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2016). Student rules: Exploring patterns of students' computer-efficacy and engagement with digital technologies in learning. Computers in Education, 101, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E., Meehan, M., & Parnell, A. (2018). Contrasting prediction methods for early warning systems at undergraduate level. Internet and Higher Education, 37, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y.-H., Lo, C.-L., & Shih, S.-P. (2014). Developing early warning systems to predict students' online learning performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 469–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Shahrill, M., Jasmi, K. A., Mustari, I., & Basiron, B. (2017). Exploring adaptive teaching competencies in big data era. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3), 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, Y. K., Mai, B., Qian, S., & Kwok, L. F. (2018). Cultivating better learning attitudes: a preliminary longitudinal study. Open Learning, 33(2), 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Y. H., Chang, R. I., & Lin, C. F. (2016). Hybrid learning style identification and developing adaptive problem-solving learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S., Dahan, N. A., Ba-Alwib, F. M., & Ribata, N. (2018). Educational data mining and analysis of students’ academic performance using WEKA. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 9(2), 447–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iam-On, N., & Boongoen, T. (2017). Improved student dropout prediction in Thai University using ensemble of mixed-type data clusterings. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 8(2), 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias-Pradas, S., Ruiz-De-Azcárate, C., & Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F. (2015). Assessing the suitability of student interactions from Moodle data logs as predictors of cross-curricular competencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intayoad, W., Kamyod, C., & Temdee, P. (2018). Synthetic minority over-sampling for improving imbalanced data in educational web usage mining. ECTI Transactions on Computer and Information Technology, 12(2), 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Išljamović, S., Jeremić, V., & Lalić, S. (2016). Indicators of study success related to impact of university students’ enrollment status. Croatian Journal of Education, 18(2), 583–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, S.K. (2018). Identifying online communities of inquiry in higher education using social network analysis. Research in Learning Technology, 26, art. no. 2064, .

  • Jena, R. K. (2018). Predicting students’ learning style using learning analytics: a case study of business management students from India. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 978–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, H., Park, K., Jo, J., & Lim, H. (2016). Mining students activities from a computer supported collaborative learning system based on peer to peer network. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 9(3), 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, I.-H., Kim, D., & Yoon, M. (2015). Constructing proxy variables to measure adult learners' time management strategies in LMS. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Loughin, T. M., Kovanović, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers in Education, 87art. no. 2870, 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, S.-H., Song, M.-H., Ryu, G.-A., Kim, M., & Yoo, K.-H. (2014). Design and implementation of a dynamic educational content viewer with big data analytics functionality. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 9(12), 73–84.

  • Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(6), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., Liu, M., & Qu, W. (2016). Using gameplay data to examine learning behavior patterns in a serious game. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 757–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausar, S., Huahu, X., Hussain, I., Wenhao, Z., & Zahid, M. (2018). Integration of data mining clustering approach in the personalized E-learning system. IEEE Access, 6art. no. 8540811, 72724–72734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N., Montenegro, M., Gonzalez, C., Clasing, P., Sandoval, A., Jara, M., Saurina, E., & Alarcοn, R. (2017). Combining event- and variable-centred approaches to institution-facing learning analytics at the unit of study level. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(1), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2018). Data mining based analysis to explore the effect of teaching on student performance. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1677–1697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khousa, E. A., & Atif, Y. (2018). Social network analysis to influence career development. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(3), 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Yoon, M., Jo, I.-H., & Branch, R. M. (2018). Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women's university in South Korea. Computers in Education, 127, 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnebrew, J. S., Killingsworth, S. S., Clark, D. B., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Minstrell, J., Martinez-Garza, M., & Krinks, K. (2017). Contextual markup and Mining in Digital Games for science learning: Connecting player behaviors to learning goals. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1) art. no. 7390255, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsiantis, S., Tselios, N., Filippidi, A., & Komis, V. (2013). Using learning analytics to identify successful learners in a blended learning course. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(2), 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnel, M., Seiler, L., Honal, A., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Mobile learning analytics in higher education: Usability testing and evaluation of an app prototype. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(4), 332–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaran, S. R., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2016). Data mining approaches in business intelligence: Postgraduate data analytic. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(8–2), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, M.-S., & Chuang, T.-Y. (2016). How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination - An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55art. no. 3652, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosa, K., Distante, D., Tervakari, A., Cerulo, L., Fernández, A., Koro, J., & Kailanto, M. (2016). Interactive visualization tools to improve learning and teaching in online learning environments. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 14(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, M.-J., Kaila, E., & Rajala, T. (2018). ViLLE – Collaborative education tool: Designing and utilizing an exercise-based learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1655–1676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacave, C., Molina, A. I., & Cruz-Lemus, J. A. (2018). Learning analytics to identify dropout factors of computer science studies through Bayesian networks. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 993–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagus, J., Longi, K., Klami, A., Hellas, A. (2018). Transfer-learning methods in programming course outcome prediction. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 18 (4), art. no. 19,

  • Lara, J. A., Lizcano, D., Martínez, M. A., Pazos, J., & Riera, T. (2014). A system for knowledge discovery in e-learning environments within the European higher education area - application to student data from Open University of Madrid, UDIMA. Computers in Education, 72, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugerman, M., Rover, D., Shelley, M., & Mickelson, S. (2015). Determining graduation rates in engineering for community college transfer students using data mining. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 1448–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J. (2017). Modeling students’ problem solving performance in the computer-based mathematics learning environment. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(5), 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Kim, S.-H., & Kwon, B. C. (2017). VLAT: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1) art. no. 7539634, 551–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y.-R., Lei, L., & Liu, L.-Q. (2017). Application of fuzzy association rules in the analysis on higher vocational college students' performance. Journal of Computers (Taiwan), 28(1), 1–12.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K., Lee, Y. H., & Mak, W. K. (2012). Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2584–2589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepp, M., Palts, T., Luik, P., Papli, K., Suviste, R., Säde, M., Hollo, K., Vaherpuu, V., & Tõnisson, E. (2018). Troubleshooters for tasks of introductory programming MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(4), 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Sun, J., & Qiang, W. (2015). Application of data mining in personalized remote distance education web system. Open Cybernetics and Systemics Journal, 9(1), 1769–1775.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lian, D.-F., & Liu, Q. (2018). Jointly recommending library books and predicting academic performance: A mutual reinforcement perspective. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 33(4), 654–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., Liu, D., Pang, W., & Wang, Z. (2015). Sherlock: A semi-automatic framework for quiz generation using a hybrid semantic similarity measure. Cognitive Computation, 7(6), 667–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Ma, W., Yang, Y., & Carbonell, J. (2016). Learning concept graphs from online educational data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 55, 1059–1090.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Ni, C., Liu, Z., Peng, X., & Cheng, H. N. H. (2017). Mining individual learning topics in course reviews based on author topic model. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 15(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., Wu, R., Chen, E., Xu, G., Su, Y., Chen, Z., Hu, G. (2018). Fuzzy cognitive diagnosis for modelling examinee performance. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 9 (4), art. no. 48, .

  • Lonn, S., Aguilar, S. J., & Teasley, S. D. (2015). Investigating student motivation in the context of a learning analytics intervention during a summer bridge program. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, C. (2016). Application of data mining in web-based education platform. Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria, 31(6), 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, C. F. (2017). Who prophets from big data in education? New insights and new challenges. Theory and Research in Education, 15(3), 249–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah, D.-K., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward academic competencies: The case of German first-year students. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 120–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, L., Das, R., Bhattacharya, S., & Basu, P. N. (2017). Intellimote: A hybrid classifier for classifying learners' emotion in a distributed e-learning environment. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 25(3), 2084–2095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manso-Vazquez, M., & Llamas-Nistal, M. (2015). Proposal of a learning organization tool with support for metacognition. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 10(2) art. no. 7086009, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manso-Vazquez, M., Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., & Llamas-Nistal, M. (2018). An xAPI application profile to monitor self-regulated learning strategies. IEEE Access, 6art. no. 8423185, 42467–42481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbouti, F., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Madhavan, K. (2016). Models for early prediction of at-risk students in a course using standards-based grading. Computers in Education, 103, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Márquez-Vera, C., Cano, A., Romero, C., Noaman, A. Y. M., Mousa Fardoun, H., & Ventura, S. (2016). Early dropout prediction using data mining: A case study with high school students. Expert Systems, 33(1), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mat, U. B., & Buniyamin, N. (2017). Using neuro-fuzzy technique to classify and predict electrical engineering students' achievement upon graduation based on mathematics competency. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 5(3), 684–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maté, A., De Gregorio, E., Cámara, J., Trujillo, J., & Luján-Mora, S. (2016). The improvement of analytics in massive open online courses by applying data mining techniques. Expert Systems, 33(4), 374–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • McNaughton, M., Rao, L., & Mansingh, G. (2017). An agile approach for academic analytics: a case study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(5), 701–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehmood, R., Alam, F., Albogami, N. N., Katib, I., Albeshri, A., & Altowaijri, S. M. (2017). UTiLearn: A personalised ubiquitous teaching and learning system for smart societies. IEEE Access, 5art. no. 7855752, 2615–2635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Y., Xu, J., Atan, O., & Van Der Schaar, M. (2016). Predicting grades. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 64(4) art. no. 7313031, 959–972.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miguéis, V. L., Freitas, A., Garcia, P. J. V., & Silva, A. (2018). Early segmentation of students according to their academic performance: A predictive modelling approach. Decision Support Systems, 115, 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minović, M., Milovanović, M., Šošević, U., & Conde González, M. Á. (2015). Visualisation of student learning model in serious games. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelmeier, J., Long, D., Cin, F. M., Reedy, K., Gunter, A., Raghuram, P., & Rienties, B. (2018). Learning design in diverse institutional and cultural contexts: Suggestions from a participatory workshop with higher education professionals in Africa. Open Learning, 33(3), 250–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad, S. K., Tasir, Z., Harun, J., Shukor, A., & N. (2013). Pattern of reflection in learning authoring system through blogging. Computers in Education, 69, 356–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad Akhriza, T., Ma, Y., & Li, J. (2017). Revealing the gap between skills of students and the evolving skills required by the industry of information and communication technology. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 27(5), 675–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Van De Sande, B., & Vanlehn, K. (2011). An analysis of students' gaming behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system: Predictors and impacts. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 21(1–2), 99–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk, M., Drlik, M., Benko, L., & Reichel, J. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of sequence patterns found by application of different educational data preprocessing techniques. IEEE Access, 5art. no. 7932437, 8989–9004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Delgado Kloos, C., Auger, M. A., Briz, S., de Castro, V., & Santalla, S. N. (2017). Lipping the classroom to improve learning with MOOCs technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(1), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwalumbwe, I., & Mtebe, J. S. (2017). Using learning analytics to predict students' performance in moodle learning management system: A case of Mbeya University of science and technology. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 79(1) art. no. 1, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagashree, N., & Pujari, N. V. (2016). A tutor assisting novel electronic framework for qualitative analysis of a question Bank. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, S., Frishkoff, G., & Collins-Thompson, K. (2018). Predicting Students' disengaged behaviors in an online meaning-generation task. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(3) art. no. 7961199, 362–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natek, S., & Zwilling, M. (2014). Student data mining solution-knowledge management system related to higher education institutions. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(14), 6400–6407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior (Article in Press).

  • Nistor, N., Baltes, B., Dascǎlu, M., Mihǎilǎ, D., Smeaton, G., & Trǎuşan-Matu, Ş. (2014). Participation in virtual academic communities of practice under the influence of technology acceptance and community factors. A learning analytics application. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkambou, R., Fournier-Viger, P., & Nguifo, E. M. (2011). Learning task models in ill-defined domain using an hybrid knowledge discovery framework. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(1), 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noaman, A. Y., Luna, J. M., Ragab, A. H. M., & Ventura, S. (2016). Recommending degree studies according to students’ attitudes in high school by means of subgroup discovery. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(6), 1101–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurhayati, O. D., Bachri, O. S., Supriyanto, A., & Hasbullah, M. (2018). Graduation prediction system using artificial neural network. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(7), 1051–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, R., Davies, R. S., Chapman, J., & Allen, G. (2017). Transaction-level learning analytics in online authentic assessments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ognjanovic, I., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, S. (2016). Using non-identifiable data to predict student course selections. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanrewaju, R. F., Khan, B. U. I., Mir, R. N., Baba, A. M., & Anwar, F. (2016). Dfam: A distributed feedback analysis mechanism for knowledge based educational big data. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(12–3), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivares-Rodríguez, C., Guenaga, M., & Garaizar, P. (2018). Using children’s search patterns to predict the quality of their creative problem solving. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 538–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, G., & Koh, J. H. L. (2013). Understanding management students' reflective practice through blogging. Internet and Higher Education, 16(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oztekin, A. (2016). A hybrid data analytic approach to predict college graduation status and its determinative factors. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(8), 1678–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabreja, K. (2017). Comparison of different classification techniques for educational data. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 9(1), 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallavi, S., Lal, K., & Lal, S. P. (2017). Analyse the academic performance of students using ANN classification with modified pillar K-means and IWFA. Wireless Personal Communications, 96(4), 6519–6541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. (2013). Modelling engineering student academic performance using academic analytics. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Yu, J. H., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data case study in a Korean higher education institute. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peró, M., Soriano, P. P., Capilla, R., Guàrdia, I., Olmos, J., & Hervás, A. (2015). Questionnaire for the assessment of factors related to university degree choice in Spanish public system: A psychometric study. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, J., Roura, S., Carmona, J., Cortadella, J., Duch, J., Giménez, O., Mani, A., Mas, J., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E., Rubio, E., De San Pedro, E., & Venkataramani, D. (2018). Jutge.Org: Characteristics and experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(3) art. no. 7968379, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phani Krishna, K. V., Mani Kumar, M., & Aruna Sri, P. S. G. (2018). Student information system and performance retrieval through dashboard. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7, 682–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piad, K. C. (2018). Determining the dominant attributes of information technology graduates employability prediction using data mining classification techniques. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(12), 3780–3790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintar, D., Begušić, D., Škopljanac-Mačina, F., & Vranić, M. (2018). Automatic extraction of learning concepts from exam query repositories. Journal of Communications Software and Systems, 14(4), 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, D., Totaram, R., & Usagawa, T. (2016). Development of open textbooks learning analytics system. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(5), 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Predić, B., Dimić, G., Rančić, D., Štrbac, P., Maček, N., & Spalević, P. (2018). Improving final grade prediction accuracy in blended learning environment using voting ensembles. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(6), 2294–2306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiang, T. (2016). Data mining algorithm and the effectiveness of mathematics classroom teaching based on support vector machine. International Journal of Database Theory and Application, 9(11), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D., Albrecht, A., Webby, B., & White, K. (2015). Learning from experience: The realities of developing mathematics courses for an online engineering programme. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(7), 991–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosav, D., Brtka, E., & Brtka, V. (2012). Mining association rules from empirical data in the domain of education. International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control, 7(5), 933–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran, R., Iyer, S., Murthy, S., Wilson, C., & Sheard, J. (2013). A theory-driven approach to predict frustration in an ITS (2013). IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(4) art. no. 6589592, 378–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, L., Geetha, A., Khalid, M., & Swarnalatha, P. (2017). Student performance prediction model based on lion-wolf neural network. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 10(1), 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, K., Stahovich, T. F., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Homework and achievement: Using smartpen technology to find the connection. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 208–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reamer, A. C., Ivy, J. S., Vila-Parrish, A. R., & Young, R. E. (2015). Understanding the evolution of mathematics performance in primary education and the implications for STEM learning: A Markovian approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., Herodotou, C., Olney, T., Schencks, M., & Boroowa, A. (2018a). Making sense of learning analytics dashboards: A technology acceptance perspective of 95 teachers. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(5), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., Lewis, T., McFarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., & Toetenel, L. (2018b). Analytics in online and offline language learning environments: The role of learning design to understand student online engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Cerezo, D., Sarasa-Cabezuelo, A., Gómez-Albarrán, M., & Sierra, J.-L. (2014). Serious games in tertiary education: A case study concerning the comprehension of basic concepts in computer language implementation courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 558–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogaten, J., & Rienties, B. C. (2018). Which first-year students are making most learning gains in stem subjects? Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the computational thinking test. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., López, M.-I., Luna, J.-M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students' final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers in Education, 68, 458–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. R. P.-J., Volz, V., Lancaster, M. K., & Divan, A. (2018). A generalizable framework for multi-scale auditing of digital learning provision in higher education. Online Learning Journal, 22(2), 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E., Asbell-Clarke, J., Baker, R. S., Eagle, M., Hicks, A. G., Barnes, T. M., Brown, R. A., & Edwards, T. (2017). Assessing implicit science learning in digital games. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, M., & Miranda, E. (2015). Management report for marketing in higher education based on data warehouse and data mining. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(4), 291–302.

  • Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Leony, D., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2015). ALAS-KA: A learning analytics extension for better understanding the learning process in the Khan academy platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruipérez-Valiente, J.A., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Gascon-Pinedo, J.A., Kloos, C.D. (2017a). Scaling to Massiveness With ANALYSE: A Learning Analytics Tool for Open edX. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, PP(99), 1–6.

  • Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Kloos, C. D. (2017b). Detecting and clustering students by their gamification behavior with badges: A case study in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 816–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruipérez-Valiente, J.A., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Delgado Kloos, C. (2018). Improving the prediction of learning outcomes in educational platforms including higher level interaction indicators. Expert Systems, 35 (6), art. no. e12298.

  • Samuel Peter James, I., Ramasubramanian, P., & Magdalene Delighta Angeline, D. (2018). Student learning context analysis by emotional intelligence with data mining tools. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 11(2), 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Pedro, M. O. Z., Baker, R. S. J. D., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2014). Carelessness and affect in an intelligent tutoring system for mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(2), 189–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Pedro, M. O. Z., Baker, R. S., & Heffernan, N. T. (2017). An integrated look at middle school engagement and learning in digital environments as precursors to college attendance. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, A., Gonzalez, C., Alarcon, R., Pichara, K., & Montenegro, M. (2018). Centralized student performance prediction in large courses based on low-cost variables in an institutional context. Internet and Higher Education, 37, 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, O. C., & Boticario, J. G. (2015). User-centred design and educational data mining support during the recommendations elicitation process in social online learning environments. Expert Systems, 32(2), 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarsfield, M., Conway, J. (2018). What can we learn from learning analytics? A case study based on an analysis of student use of video recordings. Research in Learning Technology, 26, art. no. 2087, .

  • Schmidt, M., Tawfik, A.A. (2017). Using analytics to transform a problem-based case library: An educational design research approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 12 (1), art. no. 5, .

  • Schulze, M., & Scholz, K. (2018). Learning trajectories and the role of online courses in a language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedrakyan, G., Snoeck, M., & De Weerdt, J. (2014). Process mining analysis of conceptual modeling behavior of novices - empirical study using JMermaid modeling and experimental logging environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 486–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedrakyan, G., De Weerdt, J., & Snoeck, M. (2016). Process-mining enabled feedback: "tell me what i did wrong" vs. "tell me how to do it right". Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şen, B., Uçar, E., & Delen, D. (2012). Predicting and analyzing secondary education placement-test scores: A data mining approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 9468–9476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senthil Kumar, J., Meganathan, S., Venkataraman, V., & Meena, V. (2017). A data mining approach to classify higher education sector data using Bayesian classifier. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(9), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Laguna, T., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2014). Application of learning analytics in educational videogames. Entertainment Computing, 5(4), 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Laguna, Á., Manero, B., Freire, M., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2018). A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of serious games and for inferring player learning outcomes. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(2), 2849–2871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H.a., Wyman Roth, N. E., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers in Education, 110, 35–50.

  • Sharada, N., Shashi, M., & Xiong, X. (2018). Modeling student knowledge retention using deep learning and random forests. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(6), 1347–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, R. M., Orgun, M. A., & Busch, P. (2016). Offer acceptance prediction of academic placement. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(8), 2351–2368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. C. S., Zambom, E., Rodrigues, R. L., Ramos, J. L. C., & Da Fonseca De Souza, F. (2018). Effects of learning analytics on students' self-regulated learning in flipped classroom. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(3), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. B., & Mørch, A. I. (2018). An analysis of participants' experiences from the first international MOOC offered at the University of Oslo. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(1), 40–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slimani, A., Elouaai, F., Elaachak, L., Yedri, B., & M. (2018). Learning analytics through serious games: Data mining algorithms for performance measurement and improvement purposes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, T., Kahan, T., & Livne, E. (2017). E-assessment of online academic courses via students' activities and perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasa Rao, K., Swapna, N., & Praveen Kumar, P. (2018). Educational data mining for student placement prediction using machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(1.2), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L., Burvill, C., Weir, J., & Field, B. (2016). Metrics to facilitate automated categorization of student learning patterns while using educational engineering software. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 1888–1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, S., Khan, S., & Abbas, M. A. (2017). Predicting performance of electrical engineering students using cognitive and non-cognitive features for identification of potential dropouts. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 54(2), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G., Cui, T., Beydoun, G., Chen, S., Dong, F., Xu, D., Shen, J. (2017). Towards massive data and sparse data in adaptive micro open educational resource recommendation: A study on semantic knowledge base construction and cold start problem. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9 (6), art. no. 898, .

  • Sun, G., Cui, T., Yong, J., Shen, J., & Chen, S. (2018). MLaaS: A cloud-based system for delivering adaptive micro learning in Mobile MOOC learning. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 11(2), 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, C.-Y., Huang, X.-Y., Shen, Y., Cherng, F.-Y., Lin, W.-C., & Wang, H.-C. (2017). Exploring online Learners' interactive dynamics by visually analyzing their time-anchored comments. Computer Graphics Forum, 36(7), 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supianto, A. A., Hayashi, Y., & Hirashima, T. (2017). An investigation of learner's actions in posing arithmetic word problem on an interactive learning environment. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E100D(11), 2725–2728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers in Education, 89, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tama, B. A. (2015). Learning to prevent inactive student of Indonesia Open University. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 11(2), 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Xing, W., & Pei, B. (2018). Exploring the temporal dimension of forum participation in MOOCs. Distance Education, 39(3), 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarus, J. K., Niu, Z., & Yousif, A. (2017). A hybrid knowledge-based recommender system for e-learning based on ontology and sequential pattern mining. Future Generation Computer Systems, 72, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. D. (2017). Student facing dashboards: One size fits all? Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekin, A. (2014). Early prediction of students' grade point averages at graduation: A data mining approach. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Nguyen, Q. (2017). Towards actionable learning analytics using dispositions. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1) art. no. 7839177, 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., Mittelmeier, J., & Nguyen, Q. (2018). Student profiling in a dispositional learning analytics application using formative assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 408–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, M., Considine, H., Nedic, Z., & Nafalski, A. (2016). Current and future developments in the remote laboratory NetLab. International Journal of Online Engineering, 12(8), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakar, P., Mehta, A., Manisha (2017). A unified model of clustering and classification to improve students' employability prediction. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 9 (9), 10–18.

  • Thatavarti, S., & Thammi Reddy, K. (2017). Spice: A perspective approach for gap analysis to improve student performance index. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(19), 8651–8659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, C. F., Walraven, A., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2015). The effect of regulation feedback in a computer-based formative assessment on information problem solving. Computers in Education, 87, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkin, J.H., West, M., Herman, G.L. (2018). An improved grade point average, with applications to CS undergraduate education analytics. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 18 (4), art. no. 17.

  • Tseng, C.-W., Chou, J.-J., & Tsai, Y.-C. (2018). Text mining analysis of teaching evaluation questionnaires for the selection of outstanding teaching faculty members. IEEE Access, 6art. no. 8513821, 72870–72879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, L.D., Stander, J., Gresty, K., Eales, J., Wei, Y. (2018). Stakeholder perspectives on graphical tools for visualising student assessment and feedback data. Research in Learning Technology, 26, art. no. 1997, .

  • van den Beemt, A., Buys, J., & van der Aalst, W. (2018). Analysing structured learning behaviour in massive open online courses (MOOCs): An approach based on process mining and clustering. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(5), 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Merwe, A., du Toit, T., & Kruger, H. (2018). A prescriptive specialized learning management system for academic feedback towards improved learning. Journal of Computer Science, 14(10), 1329–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne, S., Curran, M., Smith, A., VanBuren, J., Zahrieh, D., Larsen, R., & Miller, R. (2018). Facilitating student success in introductory chemistry with feedback in an online platform. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Computers in Education, 90, 80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varouchas, E., Sicilia, M.-A., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2018). Towards an integrated learning analytics framework for quality perceptions in higher education: a 3-tier content, process, engagement model for key performance indicators. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 1129–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S. K., Thakur, R. S., & Jaloree, S. (2017a). Fuzzy association rule mining based model to predict students' performance. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 7(4), 2223–2231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, P., Sood, S. K., & Kalra, S. (2017b). Smart computing based student performance evaluation framework for engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 977–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialardi, C., Chue, J., Peche, J. P., Alvarado, G., Vinatea, B., Estrella, J., & Ortigosa, Á. (2011). A data mining approach to guide students through the enrollment process based on academic performance. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 21(1–2), 217–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villano, R., Harrison, S., Lynch, G., & Chen, G. (2018). Linking early alert systems and student retention: a survival analysis approach. Higher Education, 76(5), 903–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villaseñor, E. A., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Carrillo-Calvet, H. (2017). Multiparametric characterization of scientometric performance profiles assisted by neural networks: a study of Mexican higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 110(1), 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, S. A., & Vanlehn, K. (2018). Using the tablet gestures and speech of pairs of students to classify their collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(2), 230–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, R., Falkner, K., Falkner, N., Tarmazdi, H. (2016). A method to analyze computer science students' teamwork in online collaborative learning environments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 16 (2), art. no. 7.

  • Volk, H., Kellner, K., & Wohlhart, D. (2015). Learning analytics for english language teaching. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 156–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2016). Network teaching system based on a clustering analysis algorithm. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(1), 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2017). Education policy research in the big data era: Methodological frontiers, misconceptions, and challenges. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(94).

  • Wei, X., Lin, H., Yang, L., Yu, Y. (2017). A convolution-LSTM-based deep neural network for cross-domain MOOC forum post classification. Information (Switzerland), 8 (3), art. no. 92.

  • Wijayanto, F. (2017). Input-support-output model evaluation using clustering analysis on Indonesia high school dataset. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2–5), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wook, M., Yusof, Z. M., & Nazri, M. Z. A. (2017). Educational data mining acceptance among undergraduate students. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1195–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsley, M., & Blikstein, P. (2018). A multimodal analysis of making. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 385–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Minkus, T., Ross, K. (2017). Taking the pulse of US college campuses with location-based anonymous mobile apps. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 9 (1), art. no. 3078843.

  • Wu, P., Yu, S., & Wang, D. (2018). Using a learner-topic model for mining learner interests in open learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 192–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuttke, H.-D., Hamann, M., & Henke, K. (2015). Integration of remote and virtual laboratories in the educational process. International Journal of Online Engineering, 11(3), 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Hu, J. (2015). Web-based collaborative learning system and its key techniques. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(12), 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C., Zhang, Z., Nourian, S., Pallant, A., & Hazzard, E. (2014a). Time series analysis method for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C., Zhang, Z., Nourian, S., Pallant, A., & Bailey, S. (2014b). On the instructional sensitivity of CAD logs. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 760–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, T., Zheng, Q., Zhang, W., & Qu, H. (2017). Modeling and predicting the active video-viewing time in a large-scale E-learning system. IEEE Access, 5art. no. 7954574, 11490–11504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in twitter professional learning communities. Computers in Education, 126, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., Guo, R., Petakovic, E., & Goggins, S. (2015). Participation-based student final performance prediction model through interpretable genetic programming: Integrating learning analytics, educational data mining and theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 168–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, W., Chen, X., Stein, J., & Marcinkowski, M. (2016). Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahya, A. A. (2018). Centroid particle swarm optimisation for high-dimensional data classification. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30(6), 857–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. J. H., Lu, O. H. T., Huang, A. Y.-Q., Huang, J. C.-H., Ogata, H., & Lin, A. J. Q. (2018). Predicting students’ academic performance using multiple linear regression and principal component analysis. Journal of Information Processing, 26, 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., Tao, C., Xu, L., Wu, H., & Liu, F. (2017). Construction of hierarchical cognitive academic map. IEEE Access, 5art. no. 7833131, 2141–2151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaffar, M., Hashmani, M. A., Savita, K. S., & Rizvi, S. S. H. (2018). A study of feature selection algorithms for predicting students academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(5), 541–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafra, A., & Ventura, S. (2012). Multi-instance genetic programming for predicting student performance in web based educational environments. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 12(8), 2693–2706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., An, J., Zhao, X., & Dong, Y. (2016). Using data mining on students' learning features: A clustering approach for student classification. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 20(7), 1141–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Quan, W., Zhong, Y., Xiao, W., Mou, C., & Wang, Y. (2018). Predicting high-risk students using internet access logs. Knowledge and Information Systems, 55(2), 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuhadar, L., Yang, R., & Lytras, M. D. (2013). The impact of social multimedia systems on cyberlearners. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo, Z., Zhao, K., & Eichmann, D. (2017). The state and evolution of U.S. iSchools: From talent acquisitions to research outcome. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1266–1277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelos Charitopoulos.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charitopoulos, A., Rangoussi, M. & Koulouriotis, D. On the Use of Soft Computing Methods in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Research: a Review of Years 2010–2018. Int J Artif Intell Educ 30, 371–430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00200-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00200-8

Keywords

Navigation