Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Multi-granularity Interval 2-Tuple TODIM Approach and Its Application to Green Supplier Selection

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interval 2-tuple linguistic model is widely applied to group decision making owing to the representation capabilities.In order to deal with the problem of different labels (multi-granularity), an interval 2-tuple transformation function is developed, which is beneficial to information aggregation and fusion. In addition, a novel and flexible interval 2-tuple ranking function is introduced, which can obtain the ranking result in a single-step procedure. Based on the previous distance measures, the normalized generalized interval 2-tuple distance is proposed. Furthermore, an interval 2-tuple with the aid of TODIM method is introduced to select green suppliers. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is completed and a comparative analysis is carried out with interval 2-tuple TOPSIS and VIKOR methods to verify the validity of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cai, M., Gong, Z.W., Cao, J.: The consistency measures of multi-granularity linguistic group decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29(2), 609–618 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Morente-Molinera, J.A., Pérez, I.J., Ureña, M.R., Herrera-Viedma, E.: On multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modeling in group decision making problems: a systematic review and future trends. Knowl. Based Syst. 74, 49–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morente-Molinera, J.A., Kou, G., González-Crespo, R., Corchado, J.M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Solving multi-criteria group decision making problems under environments with a high number of alternatives using fuzzy ontologies and multi-granular linguistic modelling methods. Knowl. Based Syst. 137, 54–64 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, J., Chen, R.Q., Zhang, Q.: Similarity-based approach for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic information. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzzy Knowl. Based Syst. 24(6), 873–900 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z., Fung, R.Y.K., Li, Y.L., Pu, Y.: A group multi-granularity linguistic-based methodology for prioritizing engineering characteristics under uncertainties. Comput. Ind. Eng. 91, 178–187 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun, B., Ma, W., Qian, Y.: Multigranulation fuzzy rough set over two universes and its application to decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 123, 61–74 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L.: A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Set Syst. 114(1), 43–58 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, Y.P., Fan, Z.P., Ma, J.: A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information. Inf. Sci. 178(4), 1098–1109 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Z., Ben-Arieh, D.: On the fusion of multi-granularity linguistic label sets in group decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 51(3), 526–541 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8(6), 746–752 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B 31(2), 227–234 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, J.H., Hao, J.: A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14, 435–445 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, J.H., Hao, J.: An approach to computing with words based on canonical characteristic values of linguistic labels. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 593–604 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, Y.C., Li, C.C., Xu, Y.F., Gu, X.: Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis. Negot. 24, 217–242 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L.: A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 354–370 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong, Y.C., Xu, Y.F., Yu, S.: Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17(6), 1366–1378 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong, Y.C., Hong, W.C., Xu, Y.F., Yu, S.: Selecting the individual numerical scale and prioritization method in the analytic hierarchy process: a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 19(1), 13–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, H.: The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Math. Comput. Model. 56, 27–35 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, H.: Some interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators and application in multiattribute group decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 4269–4282 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong, Y.C., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 45(4), 780–792 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, B.L., Liang, J.Y., Qian, Y.H., Dang, C.Y.: A normalized numerical scaling method for the unbalanced multi-granular linguistic sets. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzzy Knowl. Based Syst. 23, 221–243 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Wang, J.: Discussing incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in multi-granular linguistic MCGDM with unknown weight information. Soft Comput. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2915-x

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Wu, J.: Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights. Mater. Design 52, 158–167 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, H.C., Ren, M.L., Wu, J., Lin, Q.: An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(10), 2867–2880 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Lu, C., Shan, M.M.: Application of interval 2-tuple linguistic MULTIMOORA method for health-care waste treatment technology evaluation and selection. Waste Manag. 34, 2355–2364 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., You, X.Y.: Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure. Comput. Ind. Eng. 78, 249–258 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. You, X.Y., You, J.X., Liu, H.C., Zhen, L.: Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(4), 1906–1916 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wan, S.P., Xu, G.L., Dong, J.Y.: Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment. Inf. Sci. 385–386, 19–38 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bakeshlou, E.A., Khamseh, A.A., Asl, M.A.G., Sadeghi, J., Abbaszadeh, M.: Evaluating a green supplier selection problem using a hybrid MODM algorithm. J. Intell. Manuf. 28, 913–927 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohammadi, H., Farahani, F.V., Noroozi, M., Lashgari, A.: Green supplier selection by developing a new group decision-making method under type 2 fuzzy uncertainty. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 93, 1443–1462 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E.K., Zolfani, S.H.: Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 3728–3740 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., Murugesan, P.: Multicriteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 98, 66–83 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hashemi, S.H., Karimi, A., Tavana, M.: An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 178–191 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W., Pedrycz, W.: An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258, 626–638 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Cao, Q.W., Wu, J., Liang, C.Y.: An intuitionsitic fuzzy judgement matrix and TOPSIS integrated multi-criteria decision making method for green supplier selection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28(1), 117–126 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, J., Wang, J.Q.: An extended QUALIFLEX method under probability hesitant fuzzy environment for selecting green suppliers. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(6), 1866–1879 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh, A., Gupta, A., Mehra, A.: Energy planning problems with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Oper. Res. 17(3), 821–848 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Akman, G.: Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods. Comput. Ind. Eng. 86, 69–82 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dobos, I., Vörösmarty, G.: Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicator. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 157, 273–278 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fallahpour, A., Olugu, E.U., Musa, S.N., Khezrimotlagh, D., Wong, K.Y.: An integrated model for green supplier selection under fuzzy environment: application of data envelopment analysis and genetic programming approach. Neural Comput. Appl. 27, 707–725 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R.A., Reformat, M.Z.: Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction. Inf. Sci. 408, 41–69 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ji, P., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q.: A projection-based TODIM method under multi-valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection. Neural Comput. Appl. 29(1), 221–234 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, L., Wang, Y.M, Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L.: A hesitant fuzzy linguistic model for emergency decision making based on fuzzy TODIM method. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–6 (2017)

  44. Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y.: A likelihood-based TODIM approach based on multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for evaluation in logistics outsourcing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 99, 287–299 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu, W.Y., Zhang, Z., Zhong, Q.Y., Sun, L.L.: Extended TODIM for multi-criteria group decision making based on unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Comput. Ind. Eng. 114, 316–328 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Qin, Q., Liang, F., Li, L., Chen, Y.W., Yu, G.F.: A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Appl. Soft Comput. 55, 93–107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tai, W.S., Chen, C.T.: A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 3483–3488 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cheng, H., Meng, F.Y., Chen, K.: Several generalized interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic weighted distance measures and their application. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19, 967–981 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Kuo, R.J., Wang, Y.C., Tien, F.C.: Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J. Clean. Prod. 18(12), 1161–1170 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., Tavasszy, L.: A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 577–588 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gupta, H., Barua, M.: Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J. Clean. Prod. 152, 242–258 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Govindan, K., Kadziński, M., Sivakumar, R.: Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain. Omega 71, 129–145 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bakeshlou, E., Khamseh, A., Asl, M., Sadeghi, J., Abbaszadeh, M.: Evaluating a green supplier selection problem using a hybrid MODM algorithm. J. Intell. Manuf. 28(4), 913–927 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Project 71701158, MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (17YJC630114), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under the Projects 2015VI002, 2017VI010 and 185203010, and the Research Center for Systems Science & Enterprise Development (Grant No. Xq17B07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jindong Qin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, Y., Liu, J., Qin, J. et al. An Improved Multi-granularity Interval 2-Tuple TODIM Approach and Its Application to Green Supplier Selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 129–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0546-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0546-8

Keywords

Navigation