Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy Structure Element Method for Solving Fuzzy Trilinear Seepage Model of Shale Gas Reservoir

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seepage of shale gas reservoir is more complicated than that of the conventional energy because of its unique reservoir forming characteristics and physical properties. Accordingly, to achieve the large-scale exploitation of shale gas reservoir, the internal seepage characteristics of the reservoir should be clarified. Shale reservoirs are often accompanied by extreme heterogeneity and responsible variability. This phenomenon reveals that it is not reasonable to idealize the reservoir permeability as a fixed value. However, the conventional percolation model often idealizes the reservoir permeability to a specific amount. This will obviously lead to a reduction in the accuracy of the model. In the present study, the concept of fuzzy permeability was proposed. In other words, a fuzzy number was used to describe the reservoir permeability. Subsequently, the trilinear fuzzy seepage model was built and solved using the fuzzy structure element. To solve the practical application problem, a single numerical solution corresponding to the fuzzy solution set was found using the technique of defuzzification by the obtained fuzzy solution set. Finally, the fuzzy seepage model and the conventional seepage model were compared and analyzed by the numerical simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deng, J., Zhu, W., Ma, Q.: A new seepage model for shale gas reservoir and productivity analysis of fractured well. Fuel 124, 232–240 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, W., Yuan, B., Su, Y.: Second order time Aispace iterative method for the stationary Navier AiStokes equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 59, 79–86 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao, S., Liu, H., Ye, L.: A coupling model for gas diffusion and seepage in SRV section of shale gas reservoirs. Nat. Gas Ind. B 4(2), 120–126 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, P.: An efficient two-level finite element algorithm for the natural convection equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 118, 75–86 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Daiyin, Y., Dongqi, W., Chengli, Z.: Shale gas productivity predicting model and analysis of influence factors. Open Petrol. Eng. J. 8, 1 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, S., Zhang, D., Zheng, P.: Similar structure of solution for triple media shale gas reservoir. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 152, 67–80 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Warren, J.E., Root, P.J.: The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas (1963)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. De Carvalho, R.S., Rosa, A.J.: Society of Petroleum Engineers SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition - Houston, Texas (1988-10-02) SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition-Transient Pressure Behavior for Horizontal Wells in Naturally Fractured Reservoir

  9. Medeiros, F., Ozkan, E., Kazemi, H.: Productivity and drainage area of fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirsor. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 14, 663 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E., Warpinski, N.R., Cipolla, C.L., Walser, D.W., Rightmire, C.M.: What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume? Society of Petroleum Engineers (2010)

  11. Ozkan, E., Brown, M., Raghavan, R., Kazemi, H.: SPE 121290 comparison of fractured horizontal-well performance in conventional and unconventional reservoirs. Dermatol. Surg. 27(8), 703–8 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sang, Y., Chen, H., Yang, S., Guo, X., Zhou, C., Fang, B., Zhou, F., Yang, J.K.: A new mathematical model considering adsorption and desorption process for productivity prediction of volume fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J]. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 19, 228–236 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu, D., Lu, C., Zhang, W.: Algebraic properties and topological properties of the quotient space of fuzzy numbers based on Mare? equivalence relation[J]. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 245, 63–82 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Maryam, M., Mahmood, O.: Generalized trapezoidal fuzzy soft set and its application in medical diagnosis. J. Appl. Math. 4(3), 1–12 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qiu, D., Zhang, W., Lu, C.: On fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2014, 1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, S., Shu, L.: A maximum principle for general backward stochastic differential equation. J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 29(6), 1505–1518 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y., Gao, Y., Karimi, H.R.: Sliding mode control of fuzzy singularly perturbed systems with application to electric circuit. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybernet. Syst. PP(99), 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Y., Shen, H., Karimi, H.R.: Dissipativity-based fuzzy integral sliding mode control of continuous-time T–S fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(3), 1164–1176 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang, B., Karimi, H.R., Kao, Y., et al.: A novel robust fuzzy integral sliding mode control for nonlinear semi-Markovian jump T–S fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(6), 3594–3604 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Y., Xia, Y., Shen, H.: SMC design for robust stabilization of nonlinear Markovian jump singular systems. IEEE Trans. Autom Control PP(99), 1-1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang, B., Karimi, H.R., Kao, Y.: Adaptive control of nonlinear semi-Markovian jump T–S fuzzy systems with immeasurable premise variables via sliding mode observer. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. PP(99), 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, C.: Prediction Model of Natural Combustion Location in Stope Based on Fuzzy Seepage Theory and Its Similar Simulation. Liaoning University of Engineering and Technology, Liaoning (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng, Y.: Fuzzy Mathematical model and Analytical Solution of Coalbed Methane Transport Based on Structural Element Theory. Liaoning University of Engineering and Technology, Jinzhou (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allahviranloo, T., Salahshour, S.: Principle of Fuzzy Mathematical Analysis Based on Structural Element Theory. Northeastern University Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raghavan, R.S., Chen, C.C., Bijan, A.: An analysis of horizontal wells intercepted by multiple fractures. SPE J. 2(03), 235–245 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Na, R.: Fuzzy System Mathematics and its Application. Tsinghua University Press, Tsinghua (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11361050, 11671284).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duo Zhang.

Appendices

A Fuzzy Structural Element

1.1 A.1 Transformation of Fuzzy Structural Element

Definition A.1

[24] If the membership function of the fuzzy structural element is symmetrical on the axis of the ordinate \(x=0\), it is called the symmetric fuzzy structural element.

Definition A.2

[24] If the membership function of a fuzzy structural element has a \(E(x)>0\) on the interval \((-1,1)\). And in \((-1,0)\), it is a strictly single increase continuous function, and in the interval (0, 1) it is a strict single drop continuous function. E is called a regular fuzzy structural element.

Theorem A.3

[23] LetAbe a fuzzy subset ofX, and remember that\(A\in F(x)\)has a membership function. Then

$$\begin{aligned} A=\bigcup _{x\in X}A(x)*\{x\}. \end{aligned}$$
(50)

where\(\lambda *{x}\)is called the point state fuzzy set onX, and its membership function is

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}(y)= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \lambda,\quad &{}y=x,\\ 0,\quad &{}y\ne x.\\ \end{array}\right. }\quad \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(51)

Theorem A.4

[23] Considering the common mapping\(f:X\rightarrow Y\), the mapping ofF(X) toF(Y) can be induced byf

$$\begin{aligned} f:F(X)\rightarrow F(Y) A\rightarrow f(A)=\bigcup _{x\in X}A(x)*\{f(x)\}=\bigcup _{x\in X}\lambda *f(A_\lambda ). \end{aligned}$$
(52)

The membership function of the fuzzy set\(f(A)\in F(Y)\)is

$$\begin{aligned}{}[f(A)](y)=\vee _{y=f(x)}A(x). \end{aligned}$$
(53)

Theorem A.5

[23] Set the fuzzy number\(A=a+bE\), abas the finite real number, \(b>0\). if\(\forall \lambda \in [0,1]\), \(E_\lambda =[e_\lambda ^L,e_\lambda ^U]\), then the intercepting set ofAis

$$\begin{aligned} A_\lambda =\{x\mid A(x)\ge \lambda \}=[a+be_\lambda ^L,a+be_\lambda ^U]. \end{aligned}$$
(54)

1.2 A.2 Structural Element Representation of Fuzzy Numbers

Theorem A.6

[24] For a given regular fuzzy structure elementEand any finite fuzzy numberA, there is always a monotone bounded functionfon\([-1,1]\)that makes\(A=f (E)\).

Theorem A.7

[24] Letfbe a monotone bounded function on\([-1,1]\), Eis a given fuzzy structural element onR, and a fuzzy number\(A=f(E)\). \(\forall \lambda \in [0,1]\), the cut set ofEis\(E_\lambda =[e_\lambda ^L,e_\lambda ^U]\). in which\(e_\lambda ^L\in [-1,0]\), \(e_\lambda ^U\in [0,1]\). Iffis a single increment function on\([-1,1]\), the cut set of the fuzzy numberAis closed interval on theR

$$\begin{aligned} A_\lambda =[f(E)]_\lambda =f(E_\lambda )=f[e_\lambda ^L,e_\lambda ^U] =[f(e_\lambda ^L),f(e_\lambda ^U)]. \end{aligned}$$
(55)

Iffis a single drop function on\([-1,1]\), the cut set of the fuzzy numberAis closed interval on theR

$$\begin{aligned} A_\lambda =[f(e_\lambda ^U),f(e_\lambda ^L)]. \end{aligned}$$
(56)

Theorem A.8

[23] LetEbe a fuzzy structural element, andfandgare two identical monotone functions on\([-1,1]\). There is also a fuzzy number\(A=f(E)\), \(B=g(E)\), then

$$\begin{aligned} A+B =f(E)+g(E)=(f+g)(E). \end{aligned}$$
(57)

The membership function is

$$\begin{aligned} (A+B)(x) =E((f+g)^{-1}(x)). \end{aligned}$$
(58)

Definition A.9

[24] Let A be a finite fuzzy number, if there is a fuzzy structural element E and a finite real number a, r, so that \(A=a+rE\)(where r>0). It is called A is a fuzzy number generated linearly by the fuzzy structural element E.

1.3 A.3 Structural Element Representation of Fuzzy Valued Function

Let N(R) be a whole of fuzzy numbers on R, X and Y are two real numbers, \(D\subseteq X\), and \(\widetilde{f}\) is a mapping from D to N(Y). If there is a unique fuzzy number \(\widetilde{y}\in N(Y)\) for \(\forall x\in D\), remember \(\widetilde{y}=\widetilde{f}(x)\), then \(\widetilde{f}\) is called the fuzzy value function on D.

Definition A.10

[24] Considering two-dimensional real space \(X\times Y\), E is a regular fuzzy structural element on Y. Let g(xy) be a two element function on \(X\times Y\), and for \(\forall x\in X\), g(xy) is a monotone bounded function of y on \([-1,1]\), and \(g_x(y)=g(x,y)\). It is known from the principle of fuzzy expansion that \(g_x(E)=g(x,E)\) is a finite fuzzy number. Call g(xE) as the fuzzy value function generated by the fuzzy structural element E on the X, remember to \(\widetilde{F}_E=g(x,E)\), or \(\widetilde{F}(x)\) for short.

Definition A.11

[24] Let us set \(g(x,y)=f(x)+\omega (x)E\), where f(x) and \(\omega (x)\) are bounded on X, and \(\omega (x)\) is not negative. So the function g(xy) is the monotone bounded function of y on the interval \([-1,1]\), then

$$\begin{aligned} \widetilde{F}(x)=f(x)+\omega (x)E, \end{aligned}$$
(59)

is a fuzzy value function on X, which is called a fuzzy value function generated linearly by the fuzzy structural element E. Its membership function can be represented by the membership function of the fuzzy structuring element as follows:

$$\begin{aligned}{}[\widetilde{F}](y)=+\omega (x)E\left( \frac{y-f(x)}{\omega (x)}\right), \quad \forall y\in Y. \end{aligned}$$
(60)

B Nomenclature

See Table 2.

Table 2 Nomenclature

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Qiu, D. & Shu, L. Fuzzy Structure Element Method for Solving Fuzzy Trilinear Seepage Model of Shale Gas Reservoir. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 1597–1612 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00661-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00661-7

Keywords

Navigation