Skip to main content
Log in

Fault-Tolerant Controller Comparative Study and Analysis for Benchmark Two-Tank Interacting Level Control System

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times fault-tolerant controller is a prime choice because of the handling capability of the multifunction into the closed-loop system irrespective of the faults and the external process disturbances in various engineering applications. This paper presents innovative fault-tolerant control scheme using a neural network, and the main contribution of this work is to design a feedforwarded back propagation neural network for controlling the actuator and system component (leak) faults into the level control process. By adopting the neural network as a fault-tolerant controller the efficacy of the fault-tolerant control scheme is dominating to the conventional scheme proposed by Dutta et al. (Real-time linear quadratic versus sliding mode liquid level control of a coupled tank system” In: International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Communications (ICDCCom 2014), IEEE, 12–12 September 2014, Ranchi, India, 2014; pp. 1–6. 10.1109/ICDCCom.2014.7024741). In addition, statistical analysis is done for validating the proposed fault-tolerant controller scheme and RMSE is also deliberate and give evidence of the performance of proposed FTC scheme. The Two-Tank benchmark Network Level Control structure is taken for simulation of both the fault-tolerant control scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dutta S, Seal S, Sengupta A. “Real time linear quadratic versus sliding mode liquid level control of a coupled tank system” In: International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Communications (ICDCCom 2014), IEEE, 12–12 September 2014, Ranchi, India, 2014; pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCCom.2014.7024741

  2. Patel HR, Shah VA. “Fault detection and diagnosis methods in power generation plants - the indian power generation sector perspective: an introductory review.” PDPU J Energy Manag. 2018;2(2): 31–49. ISSN 2581–5849.

  3. Patel HR, Shah VA. “A framework for fault-tolerant control for an interacting and non-interacting level control system using AI.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics—Volume 1: ICINCO, ISBN 978–989–758–321–6, 2018; pp. 180–190.https://doi.org/10.5220/0006862001800190.

  4. Patel HR, Shah VA. A passive fault-tolerant control strategy for a non-linear system: an application to the two tank conical non-interacting level control system. Maskay. 2019;9(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel HR, Shah VA. Fuzzy logic based passive fault tolerant control strategy for a single-tank system with system fault and process disturbances. In: Proc. 5th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICEEE), Istanbul, Turkey; 2018, pp. 257–262.

  6. Patel HR, Shah VA. Performance comparison of passive fault tolerant control strategy with pi and fuzzy control of single-tank level process with sensor and system fault. Sci Publ Am J Eng Appl Sci. 2019;12(2):236–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhandare D, Kulkarni NR. Performances evaluation and comparison of pid controller and fuzzy logic controller for process liquid level control. In: 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (lCCAS 2015) October 13–16, Busan, South Korea. 2015; pp. 1347–1352, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364848

  8. Bonivento C, Isidori A, Marconi L, Paoli A. Implicit fault-tolerant control: application to induction motors. Automatica. 2004;40(3):355–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Noura H, Sauter D, Hamelin F, Theilliol D. Fault-tolerant control in dynamic systems: application to a winding machine. IEEE Control Syst Mag. 2000;20(1):33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morse WD, Ossman KA. Model following reconfigurable flight control system for the AFTI/F1-16. Guidance. 1990;13(6):969–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel HR, Shah VA. Fault tolerant control systems: a passive approaches for single tank level control system,” i-manager’s. J Instru Control Eng. 2018;6(1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jic.6.1.13934

  12. Patel HR, Shah VA. Passive fault tolerant control system using feed-forward neural network for two-tank interacting conical level control system against partial actuator failures and disturbances. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;52(14):141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel HR, Shah VA. Stable fault tolerant controller design for takagi–sugeno fuzzy model-based control systems via linear matrix inequalities: three conical tank case study. Energies 2019;12(11): 2221

  14. Patel HR, Shah VA. Integrated design of model-based passive fault-tolerant control for nonlinear systems based on PID and fuzzy control. In: Pant M, Sharma T, Verma O, Singla R, Sikander A (eds) Soft computing: theories and applications. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 2020;1053: 155–169, Springer, Singapore,

  15. Patel HR, Shah VA. Comparative study between fractional order PIλDμ and integer order PID controller: a case study of coupled conical tank system with actuator faults. In: 4th conference on control and fault tolerant systems (SysTol 2019), IEEE; 2019, pp. 390–396

  16. Luzar M, Witczak M, Korbicz J, Witczak P. Neural-network based robust FTC: application to wind turbines. In: Rutkowski L, Korytkowski M, Scherer R, Tadeusiewicz R, Zadeh LA, Zurada JM (eds) Artificial intelligence and soft computing. ICAISC 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8467, pp 97–108, Springer, Cham; 2014

  17. Mou C, Rong M. Actuator fault tolerant control for a class of nonlinear systems using neural networks. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), June 18–20, 2014. Taichung, Taiwan; 2014

  18. Shen Q, Jiang B, Shi P. Neural network-based fault tolerant control scheme against un-modeled fault. Stud Syst Decis Control. 2017;91:163–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel HR, Shah VA. Actuator and system component fault tolerant control using interval type-2 takagi-sugeno fuzzy controller for hybrid nonlinear process. 2019;15(3):143–153.

  20. Patel HR, Shah VA. Fault tolerant control using interval type-2 takagi-sugeno fuzzy controller for nonlinear system. In: Abraham A, Cherukuri A, Melin P, Gandhi N (eds) Intelligent systems design and applications. ISDA 2018 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 941, pp. 150–164, Springer, Cham; 2020

  21. Patel HR, Shah VA. A fractional and integer order pid controller for nonlinear system: two non-interacting conical tank process case study. In: Mehta A, Rawat A, Chauhan P, editors. Advances in control systems and its infrastructure lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 604. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 37–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel HR, Shah VA. Passive fault-tolerant control based on interval type-2 fuzzy controller for coupled tank system. In: Kumar L, Jayashree L, Manimegalai R (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Smart Grid and Smart City Applications. AISGSC 2019 2019. Springer, Cham; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24051-6_14

  23. Raval S, Patel HR, Shah VA. Neural network-based control framework for SISO uncertain system: passive fault tolerant approach. In: Kahraman C, Cevik Onar S, Oztaysi B, Sari I, Cebi S, Tolga A (eds) Intelligent and fuzzy techniques: smart and innovative solutions. INFUS 2020. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 1197. Springer, Cham; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_121

  24. Fayaz M, Kim D. A prediction methodology of energy consumption based on deep extreme learning machine and comparative analysis in residential buildings. Electronics. 2018;7:222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. González PA, Zamarreno JM. Prediction of hourly energy consumption in buildings based on a feedback artificial neural network. Energy Build. 2005;37: 595–601

  26. Gibbs MS, Morgan N, Maier HR, Dandy GC, Nixon JB, Holmes M. Investigation into the relationship between chlorine decay and water distribution parameters using data driven methods. Math Comput Model. 2006;44(5–6):485–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. MATLAB Version 8; (R2013a); The Mathworks Inc.: Natick, MA, USA, 2013.

Download references

Funding

No external funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SR and HRP conceived the idea for the paper, designed and performed the simulation and wrote the paper. VAS assisted in paper revision and supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himanshukumar R. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The writers do not declare any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Data Science and Communication” guest edited by Kamesh Namudri, Naveen Chilamkurti, Sushma S J and S. Padmashree””

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raval, S., Patel, H.R. & Shah, V.A. Fault-Tolerant Controller Comparative Study and Analysis for Benchmark Two-Tank Interacting Level Control System. SN COMPUT. SCI. 2, 93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00489-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00489-9

Keywords

Navigation