Abstract
In the last decades, the comet assay has been used as a molecular biomarker to detect DNA damage in several human biomonitoring studies. Nevertheless, many of these studies are often inconclusive or offer poor quality data due to study design constraints. This chapter describes not only the experimental protocol to carry the alkaline version of the comet assay in human cells but also considers many of the obstacles that the researcher faces while carrying a human biomonitoring study, such as sample size, sample type, sample collection, statistics, and result communication. Understanding assay limitations, both experimental and biological, is essential to improve both data quality and data relevance obtained and to guarantee that comet assay continues to provide enhanced reliability as a biomarker in human biomonitoring studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McKelvey-Martin V, Green M, Schomezer P et al (1993) The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): a European review. Mutat Res 288:47–63
Collins AR, Dobson VL, Dusinska M et al (1997) The Comet assay: what can it really tell us? Mutat Res 375:183–193
Burlinson B, Tice RR, Speit G et al (2007) Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup. Mutat Res 627:31–35
Collins A, Duthie S, Dobson V (1993) Direct enzymic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA. Carcinogenesis 14:1733–1735
Gedik C, Ewen S, Collins A (1992) Single-cell gel electrophoresis applied to the analysis of UV-C damage and its repair in human cells. Int J Radiat Biol 62:313–320
Pfuhler S, Wolf HU (1996) Detection of DNA-crosslinking agents with the alkaline comet assay. Environ Mol Mutagen 27(1):196–201
Santos J, Singh N, Natajaran A (1997) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with comets. Exp Cell Res 232(2):407–411
Wentzel JF, Gouws C, Huysamen C et al (2010) Assessing the DNA methylation status of single cells with the comet assay. Anal Biochem 400:190–194
Collins AR (2004) The comet assay for DNA damage and repair. Principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol 26:249–261
Links JM, Kensler TW, Groopman JD (1995) Biomarkers and mechanistic approaches in environmental epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health 16:83–103
IEH (1996) In: The use of biomarkers in environmental exposure assessment, Leicester, UK
Collins AR, Oscoz AA, Brunborg G et al (2008) The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis 23(3):143–151
Faust F, Kassie F, Knasmüller S et al (2004) The use of the alkaline comet assay with lymphocytes in human biomonitoring studies. Mutat Res 566:209–229
Speit G, Hanelt S, Helbig R et al (1996) Detection of DNA effects in human cells with the comet assay and their relevance for mutagenesis. Toxicol Lett 88:91–98
Hartmann A, Plappert U, Poetter F et al (2003) Comparative study with the alkaline Comet assay and the chromosome aberration test. Mutat Res 536(1–2):27–38
Wong VW, Szeto Y, Collins AR et al (2005) The Comet assay: a biomonitoring tool for nutraceutical research. Curr Top Nutraceut Res 3(1):1–14
Astley S, Langrish-Smith A, Southon S et al (1999) Vitamin E supplementation and oxidative damage to DNA and plasma LDL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 22(10):1626–1631
Uriol E, Sierra M, Comendador MA et al (2013) Long-term biomonitoring of breast cancer patients under adjuvant chemotherapy: the comet assay as a possible predictive factor. Mutagenesis 28(1):39–48
Schabath MB, Spitz MR, Grossman HB et al (2003) Genetic instability in bladder cancer assessed by the comet assay. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(7):540–547
Valverde M, Rojas E (2009) Environmental and occupational biomonitoring using the Comet assay. Mutat Res 681:93–109
Silva I (1999) Cancer epidemiology: principles and methods. IARC, Lyon
Albertini RJ, Anderson D, Douglas GR et al (2000) IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. Mutat Res 463:111–172
Collins A, Koppen G, Valdiglesias V et al (2014) The comet assay as a tool for human biomonitoring studies: the ComNet project. Mutat Res 759:27–39
Møller P, Knudsen LE, Loft S et al (2000) The comet assay as a rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to DNA-damaging agents and effect of counfounding factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:1005–1015
Møller P (2006) Assessment of reference values for DNA damage detected by the comet assay in human blood cell DNA. Mutat Res 612:84–104
Bonita R (2006) Basic epidemiology. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn4201434
Pearce N, Checkoway H, Kriebel D (2007) Bias in occupational epidemiology studies. Occup Environ Med 64:562–568
Angerer J, Ewers U, Wilhelm M (2007) Human biomonitoring: state of the art. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210(3–4):201–228
Hagmar L, Bonassi S, Strömberg U et al (1998) Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer: a report from the European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health (ESCH). Cancer Res 58:4117–4121
Van Delft JHM, Baan RA, Roza L (1998) Biological effect markers for exposure to carcinogenic compound and their relevance for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 28(5):477–510
Chuang C-H, Hu M-L (2004) Use of whole blood directly for single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay in vivo and white blood cells for in vitro assay. Mutat Res 564:75–82
Eren K, Özmeriç N, Sardas S (2002) Monitoring of buccal epithelial cells by alkaline comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis technique) in cytogenetic evaluation of chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig 6:150–154
Rojas E, Valverde M, Lopez MC et al (2000) Evaluation of DNA damage in exfoliated tear duct epithelial cells from individuals exposed to air pollution assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat Res 468:11–17
Morris I, Ilott S, Dixon L et al (2002) The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 17(4):990–998
WHO (2010) WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=37621. Accessed 20 Nov 2013
Hininger I, Chollat-Namy A, Sauvaigo S et al (2004) Assessment of DNA damage by comet assay on frozen total blood: method and evaluation in smokers and non-smokers. Mutat Res 558:75–80
Duthie S, Pirie L, Jenkinson A et al (2002) Cryopreserved versus freshly isolated lymphocytes in human biomonitoring: endogenous and induced DNA damage, antioxidant status and repair capability. Mutagenesis 17(3):211–214
Holland NT, Smith MT, Eskenazi B et al (2003) Biological sample collection and processing for molecular epidemiological studies. Mutat Res 543:217–234
Narayanan S, Donovan M, Duthie S (2001) Lysis of whole blood in vitro causes DNA strand breaks in human lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 16(6):455–459
Anderson D, Yu T-W, Dobrzynska MM et al (1997) Effects in the Comet assay of storage conditions on human blood. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 17:115–125
Villavicencio D (2006) Evaluation of storage conditions for assessing DNA damage using the comet assay. Indiana University
Al-Salmani K, Abbas HHK, Schulpen S et al (2011) Simplified method for the collection, storage, and comet assay analysis of DNA damage in whole blood. Free Radic Biol Med 51:719–725
Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C et al (2003) Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. Mutagenesis 18(1):45–51
Vasquez MZ (2010) Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation. Mutagenesis 25(2):187–199
Vasquez M (2007) Cytotoxicity and its impact on the in vivo comet assay. Environ Mol Mutagen 48:624
Azqueta A, Gutzkow KB, Brunborg G et al (2011) Towards a more reliable comet assay: optimising agarose concentration, unwinding time and electrophoresis conditions. Mutat Res 724:41–45
Ersson C, Möller L (2011) The effects on DNA migration of altering parameters in the comet assay protocol such as agarose density, electrophoresis conditions and durations of the enzyme or the alkaline treatments. Mutagenesis 26(6):689–695
Speit G, Trenz K, Schütz P et al (1999) The influence of temperature during alkaline treatment and electrophoresis on results obtained with the comet assay. Toxicol Lett 110:73–78
Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D et al (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206–221
Boeck MD, Touil N, Visscher GD et al (2000) Validation and implementation of an internal standard in comet assay analysis. Mutat Res 469:181–197
Kumaravel T, Vilhar B, Faux SP et al (2009) Comet assay measurements: a perspective. Cell Biol Toxicol 25:53–64
Zainol M, Stoute J, Almeida GM et al (2009) Introducing a true internal standard for the Comet assay to minimize intra- and inter-experiment viability in measures of DNA damage and repair. Nucleic Acids Res 37(22):e150
Sharma AK, Soussaline F, Sallette J et al (2012) The influence of the number of cells scored on the sensitivity in the comet assay. Mutat Res 749:70–75
Azqueta A, Meier S, Priestley C et al (2011) The influence of scoring method on variability in results obtained with the comet assay. Mutagenesis 26(3):393–399
Lovell DP, Omori T (2008) Statistical issues in the use of the Comet assay. Mutagenesis 23(3):171–182
Azqueta A, Collins AR (2013) The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair. Arch Toxicol 87(6):949–968
Bailey LA, Gordi L, Green M et al (1996) Reference guide on epidemiology. Jurimetrics 36(2):159–168
Vineis P, Gallo V (2007) The epidemiology theory: principles of biomarker validation. In: Vineis P, Gallo V (eds) Epidemiology concepts of validation of biomarkers for the identification/quantification of environmental carcinogenic exposures. ECNIS, London
Wojewódzka M, Machaj EK, Goździk A et al (2008) DNA damage in subpopulations of human lymphocytes irradiated with doses in the range of 0–1 Gy of X-radiation. Nukleonika 53(4):145–149
Wiklund SJ, Agurell E (2003) Aspects of design and statistical analysis in the Comet assay. Mutagenesis 18(2):167–175
Bates MN, Hamilton JW, LaKind JS et al (2005) Workgroup report: biomonitoring study design, interpretation, and communication—lessons learned and path forward. Environ Health Perspect 113(11):1615–1621
Sandman PM (1991) Emerging communication, responsibilities of epidemiologists. J Clin Epidemiol 44(Suppl I):41S–50S
Azqueta A, Gutzkow KB, Priestley CC et al (2013) A comparative performance test of standard, medium- and high-throughput comet assays. Toxicol In Vitro 2:768–773
Dusinska M, Collins AR (2008) The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene–environment interactions. Mutagenesis 23(3):191–205
Collins A, Anderson D, Coskun E et al (2012) Launch of the ComNet (comet network) project on the comet assay in human population studies during the International Comet Assay Workshop meeting in Kuasadasi, Turkey (September 13–16, 2011). Mutagenesis 27(4):385–386
Gedik CM, Collins A (2005) Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study. FASEB J 19(1):82–84
Møller P, Möller L, Godschalk RW et al (2010) Assessment and reduction of comet assay variation in relation to DNA damage: studies from the European Comet Assay Validation Group. Mutagenesis 25(2):109–111
Forchhammer L, Ersson C, Loft S et al (2012) Inter-laboratory variation in DNA damage using a standard comet assay protocol. Mutagenesis 27(6):665–672
Bennett DA, Waters MD (2000) Applying biomarker research. Environ Health Perspect 108(9):907–910
Bonassi S, Znaor A, Ceppi M et al (2007) An increased micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer in humans. Carcinogenesis 28(3):625–631
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Costa, C., Teixeira, J.P. (2014). The Comet Assay In Vivo in Humans. In: Sierra, L., Gaivão, I. (eds) Genotoxicity and DNA Repair. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1067-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1068-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols