Skip to main content
  • 34k Accesses

Abstract

For many, the concept of fire risk elicits thoughts of the built environment. Yet occupants in the built environment are also passengers on airplanes, in trains, and on ships. The number of passengers boarding scheduled commercial airlines is expected to exceed 985 million by the year 2009. Rail rapid transit systems throughout the United States (U.S.) carry almost two billion passengers annually. Ferryboats account for more than 270 million passenger miles per year [1]. In 2010, motor coaches (or buses) topped 76.1 billion passenger miles in the U.S. and Canada [2]. Every mode of transportation carries with it unique risks; the risks are dependent on a myriad of factors, including design, construction, maintenance, and operation. Understanding or comparing the risks associated with and between the various methods of transport is not always direct. It is complicated by various metrics that can be used for example, risk per distance, risk per trip, risk per passenger exposure hour. For example per mile traveled, the fatality risk in air transport is less than that for bus transport, however, per trip, the risk in air transport is on the order of 100 times greater than that of bus transport [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. We Are All Safer, NTSB-Inspired Improvements in Transportation Safety, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Motorcoach Census 2011, American Bus Association Foundation, June 18, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fire Safety Assessment of Bus Transportation, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Bus’92, The Expanding Role of Buses Towards the Twenty First Century, Charters, D.A., 1992PP 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.R. Galea and S. Gwynne, “Evacuating an Overturned Smoke Filled Rail Carriage,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium Human Behaviour in Fire, Boston, pp. 135–146 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aircraft Materials Fire Test Handbook, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, Appendix D (last updated May 18, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Harrald, M. Grabowski, J.R.W. Merrick, and J.R. Van Dorp, The Washington State Ferries Risk Assessment: Final Report, George Washington University, Washington, DC, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.P. Sarkos, “Development of Improved Fire Safety Standards Adopted by the FAA,” in Proceedings No. 467, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Conference, Neuilly, France (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hill and C. Sarkos, “FAA Fire Safety R&D Program: Past, Present and Future,” Proceedings of the Fourth Triennial International Fire and Safety Cabin Research Conference, Cabin Safety Research Technical Group and National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hill, “Investigation and Characteristics of Major Fire Related Accidents in Civil Air Transports over the Past Ten Years,” in Proceedings No. 467, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Conference, Neuilly, France (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Jia, M. Patel, E. Galea, A. Grandison, and J. Ewer, “CFD Fire Simulation of the Swissair Flight 111 In-Flight Fire—Part 2: Fire Spread Analysis,” The Aeronautical Journal, 110, 1107, pp. 303–314 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E.R. Galea, K.M. Finney, A.J.P. Dixon, A. Siddiqui, and D.P. Cooney, “Aircraft Accident Statistics and Knowledge Database: Analyzing Passenger Behaviour in Aviation Accidents,” AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 43, 5, pp. 1272–1281 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R.W. Cherry, Reduction in Rate of Fire Caused Accidents and Deaths, The Fourth Triennial International Fire and Safety Cabin Research Conference, Lisbon (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Khouzam, Fire and Cabin Safety Research: A Perspective, The Fourth Triennial International Fire and Safety Cabin Research Conference, Lisbon (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E.R. Galea, “Proposed Methodology for Use of Computer Simulation to Enhance Aircraft Evacuation Certification,” Journal of Aircraft, 43, 5 (Sept.–Oct. 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Railroad Safety Statistics, 2004 Annual Report, U.S. DOT, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC (Nov. 30, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Transportation Safety Board, “Railroad Accident Report: Collision of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) Train 59 with a Loaded Truck-Semitrailer Combination at a Highway/Rail Grade Crossing in Bourbonnais, Illinois, March 15, 1999,” National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  17. NTSB, “Railroad Accident Report—Fire Onboard Amtrak Passenger Train No. 11, the Coast Starlight, Gibson, California, June 23, 1982, Adopted: April 19, 1983,” Report No. NTSB/RAR-83/03, Washington, DC (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 2002 Korean Fire Data, Risk Management Department, Korean Fire Protection Association, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Mar. 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Colonna, Fire Protection Handbook, 19th ed. (A.E. Cote et al., eds.), National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, p. 14–1 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Bukowski, “Fire Hazard Assessment for Transportation Vehicles,” The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd ed., Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MA, 5-227–5-233 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. FRA 49 CFR, Transportation, Parts 216, 223, 229, 231, 232, and 238, “Passenger Equipment Safety Standards, Final Rule,” Federal Register, 64, 91 (May 12, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. NFPA 130, Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. National Transit Database Safety & Security Newsletter, Spring 2005, Volume 3, Issue 1, U.S. Department of Transportation – Federal Transit Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  24. FTA-MA-26-0010-94-1/DOT-VNTSC-FTA-94-2, Bus and Passenger Accident Prevention, U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Transit Database (NTD) FTA Safety and Security – Transit Safety – Safety and Security Statistics, http://transit-safety.volpe.dot.gov/data/samis.aspx.

  26. FTA-MA-26-0053-05-1/ DOT-VNTSC-FTA-07-02 Transit Safety & Security Statistics & Analysis 2003 Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation – John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ahrens, M. Vehicle Fires Involving Buses and School Buses, National Fire Protection Association – Fire Analysis and Research Division, Quincy, MA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahrens, M. U.S. Vehicle Fire Trends and Patterns, National Fire Protection Association – Fire Analysis and Research Division, Quincy, MA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Forsth, M. “Bus Fires – Presentation of a Large Nordic Research Project” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on FIVE – Fires in Vehicles, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hammarstrom, R., J. Axelsson, M. Forsth, P. Johansson, B. Sundstrom, Bus Fire Safety, SP Report 2008:41, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Borås 2008

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Peachey, Passenger Safety Ensuring Acceptable Risk,” in Conference Proceedings, Safety of Large Passenger Ships, Institute of Marine Engineers and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, London, UK (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R.P. Skjong, M.L. Adamcik, S. Eknes, J. Gran, and J. Spouge, “Formal Safety Assessment of Helicopter Landing Areas on Passenger Ships as a Safety Measure,” DNV Report 97-2053 (available as IMO/COMSAR 3/2), Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Oslo, Norway (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Hanson, “Risk Based Fire Research Decision Methodology,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Eberly and G. Colonna, “Marine Vessels,” Fire Protection Handbook, 19th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, pp. 14-91–14-123 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  35. DNV Report 98-0552, Det Norski Veritas (DNV), Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. Staalstgrom and A. Eknes, Complexity of Safety Considerations with Large Passenger Vessels,” in Conference Proceedings, Safety of Large Passenger Ships, Institute of Marine Engineers and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, London, UK (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. W.A. O’Neil, “Opening Address,” in Conference Proceedings Fire Safety on Ships Developments into the 21st Century, Institute of Marine Engineers, London, UK (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  38. NFPA 301, Code for Safety to Life from Fire on Merchant Vessels, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  39. NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. P.J. Allender, “Fire Safety Analysis for Public Mass Transit Trains,” Fire and Materials, 3, 2 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Modarres, Risk Analysis in Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2006).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Federal Aviation Administration System Safety Handbook, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington DC (Dec. 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  43. “No Air Crash Miracle, Just Safer Design,” New Scientist Magazine (13 Aug. 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Downey, “Commercial Aviation Safety Team,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Triennial International Fire and Safety Cabin Research Conference, Lisbon, Portugal (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. W. Cherry, The Accident Database of the CSRTG, The Fourth Triennial International Fire and Safety Cabin Research Conference, Lisbon (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  46. T. Marker, C. Sarkos, and R. Hill, Water Spray System Development and Evaluation for Enhanced Postcrash Fire Survivability and In-Flight Protection in Cargo Compartments,” Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Conference Proceedings No. 587, Neuilly Sur Seine, France (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  47. T.O. Tengs, Five Hundred Life Saving Interventions and Their Cost Effectiveness,” Risk Analysis, 15 (3), 369 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Kelman, Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique,” AEI Journal on Government and Society regulations, 5 (1) (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. Macey and M. Hayes, “Computer Based Simulation and Risk Assessment Model for Investigation of Airliner Fire Safety,” Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Conference Proceedings No. 587, Neuilly Sur Seine, France (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 49 CFR Part 571.302 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Standard No. 302; Flammability of interior materials.

    Google Scholar 

  51. ASTM E 162, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Materials Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2008b.

    Google Scholar 

  52. ASTM E 662, Standard Test Method for Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  53. ISO 3795, Road Vehicles, and Tractors and Machinery for Agriculture and Forestry — Determination of Burning Behaviour of Interior Materials, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  54. TP-302-03, U.S. Department of Transportation – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Laboratory Test Procedure for FMVSS 302 – Flammability of Interior Materials, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Directive 95/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 relating to the burning behaviour of materials used in the interior construction of certain categories of motor vehicle.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sundstrom, B., “Comparison of Product Evaluation Systems in Europe for Road and Rail Vehicles, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on FIVE – Fires in Vehicles, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hirschler, M., “New NFPA Guide on Fire Hazard in Road Vehicles”, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on FIVE – Fires in Vehicles, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  58. DOT-FTA-MA- 26-5005-00-01/DOT-VNTSC-FTA-00-01, Hazard Analysis Guidelines for Transit Projects, U.S. Department of Transportation – Research and Special Programs Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA, January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Guide for Fire Safety Risk Assessment – Transport Premises and Facilities, Department for Communities and Local Government Publications, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. NFPA 556, Guide on Methods for Evaluating Fire Hazard to Occupants of Passenger Road Vehicles, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  61. SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection: Analysis and Design of Buildings, 2000 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Coast Guard Safety Alert, Star Princess Cruise Ship Fire, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (Apr. 27, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  63. J.R. Merrick and R. Van Dorp, “Speaking the Truth in Maritime Risk Assessment,” Risk Analysis, 26, 1 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. C. Sprague, D. White, and B. Dolph, Fire Safety Analysis of the USCGC Dependable, United States Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard, Portsmouth, VA (Jan. 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  65. P. Goodwin and G. Wright, Decision Analysis for Management Judgment, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  66. E. Galea, A. Grandison, L. Filippidis, S. Gwynne, J. Ewer, and P. Lawrence, “The Simulation of Fire and Evacuation at Sea,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Interflam Conference, Edinburgh, pp. 755–760 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  67. B. Macesker, B. Dolph, J. Myers, D.A. Walker, and S.G. Schoolcraft, Building a Toolbox for Risk Based Decision Making Within Your Organization, U.S. Coast Guard, Washington, DC (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  68. J.R. Van Dorp, J.R.W. Merrick, J.R. Harold, T.A. Mazzuchi, and M. Grabowski, “A Risk Management Procedure for the Washington State Ferries,” Risk Analysis, 21 (1), pp. 127–142 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. J.R.W. Merrick, J.R. van Dorp, J.P. Blackford, G.L. Shaw, J. Harrald, and T.A. Mazzuchi, “Traffic Density Analysis of Proposed Ferry Service Expansion in San Francisco Bay Using a Maritime Simulation Model,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 81 (2), p. 119 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Society of Fire Protection Engineers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolski, A., Alston, J. (2016). Fire Risk in Mass Transportation. In: Hurley, M.J., et al. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_90

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2564-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2565-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics