Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Efficient Symmetry Breaking for SAT-Based Minimum DFA Inference

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Language and Automata Theory and Applications (LATA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11417))

Abstract

Inference of deterministic finite automata (DFA) finds a wide range of important practical applications. In recent years, the use of SAT and SMT solvers for the minimum size DFA inference problem (MinDFA) enabled significant performance improvements. Nevertheless, there are many problems that are simply too difficult to solve to optimality with existing technologies. One fundamental difficulty of the MinDFA problem is the size of the search space. Moreover, another fundamental drawback of these approaches is the encoding size. This paper develops novel compact encodings for Symmetry Breaking of SAT-based approaches to MinDFA. The proposed encodings are shown to perform comparably in practice with the most efficient, but also significantly larger, symmetry breaking encodings.

IZ was supported by RFBR (project 18-37-00425). AM, AI and JMS were supported by FCT grants ABSOLV (PTDC/CCI-COM/28986/2017), FaultLocker (PTDC/CCI-COM/29300/2017), SAFETY (SFRH/BPD/120315/2016), and SAMPLE (CEECIND/04549/2017). VU was supported by the Government of Russia (Grant 08-08).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The encoding size shown is adapted from the results in [20], taking into account that both \(|T^{+}|\) and \(|T^{-}|\) can grow with \(N=|T|\). The size of \(|\varSigma |\) is assumed constant.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/ctlab/DFA-Inductor.

  3. 3.

    http://www.labri.fr/perso/lsimon/glucose/.

References

  1. Abela, J., Coste, F., Spina, S.: Mutually compatible and incompatible merges for the search of the smallest consistent DFA. In: ICGI, pp. 28–39 (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin, D.: Learning regular sets from queries and counterexamples. Inf. Comput. 75(2), 87–106 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Asín, R., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E.: Cardinality networks: a theoretical and empirical study. Constraints 16(2), 195–221 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Belov, A., Lynce, I., Marques-Silva, J.: Towards efficient MUS extraction. AI Commun. 25(2), 97–116 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biermann, A.W., Feldman, J.A.: On the synthesis of finite-state machines from samples of their behavior. IEEE Trans. Comput. 21(6), 592–597 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bugalho, M.M.F., Oliveira, A.L.: Inference of regular languages using state merging algorithms with search. Pattern Recognit. 38(9), 1457–1467 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coste, F., Nicolas, J.: Regular inference as a graph coloring problem. In: IWGI (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coste, F., Nicolas, J.: How considering incompatible state mergings may reduce the DFA induction search tree. In: ICGI, pp. 199–210 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: Translating Pseudo-Boolean constraints into SAT. JSAT 2(1–4), 1–26 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gent, I.P., Nightingale, P.: A new encoding of all different into SAT. In: Workshop on Modelling and Reformulating Constraint Satisfaction Problems, pp. 95–110 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grinchtein, O., Leucker, M., Piterman, N.: Inferring network invariants automatically. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 483–497. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11814771_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Heule, M.J.H., Verwer, S.: Exact DFA identification using SAT solvers. In: Sempere, J.M., García, P. (eds.) ICGI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6339, pp. 66–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15488-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Heule, M., Verwer, S.: Software model synthesis using satisfiability solvers. Empir. Softw. Eng. 18(4), 825–856 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de la Higuera, C.: A bibliographical study of grammatical inference. Pattern Recognit. 38(9), 1332–1348 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation - International Edition, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang, K.J.: Faster algorithms for finding minimal consistent DFAs. Technical report, NEC Research Institute (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lang, K.J., Pearlmutter, B.A., Price, R.A.: Results of the Abbadingo one DFA learning competition and a new evidence-driven state merging algorithm. In: Honavar, V., Slutzki, G. (eds.) ICGI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1433, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054059

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgado, A., Heras, F., Liffiton, M.H., Planes, J., Marques-Silva, J.: Iterative and core-guided MaxSAT solving: a survey and assessment. Constraints 18(4), 478–534 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Neider, D.: Applications of automata learning in verification and synthesis. Ph.D. thesis, RWTH Aachen University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neider, D., Jansen, N.: Regular model checking using solver technologies and automata learning. In: NFM, pp. 16–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oliveira, A.L., Marques-Silva, J.: Efficient algorithms for the inference of minimum size DFAs. Mach. Learn. 44(1/2), 93–119 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sinz, C.: Towards an optimal CNF encoding of Boolean cardinality constraints. In: van Beek, P. (ed.) CP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3709, pp. 827–831. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11564751_73

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Trakhtenbrot, B.A., Barzdin, Y.M.: Finite Automata: Behavior and Synthesis. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulyantsev, V., Tsarev, F.: Extended finite-state machine induction using SAT-solver. In: ICMLA, pp. 346–349 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ulyantsev, V., Zakirzyanov, I., Shalyto, A.: BFS-based symmetry breaking predicates for DFA identification. In: Dediu, A.-H., Formenti, E., Martín-Vide, C., Truthe, B. (eds.) LATA 2015. LNCS, vol. 8977, pp. 611–622. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15579-1_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Verwer, S., Hammerschmidt, C.A.: flexfringe: a passive automaton learning package. In: ICSME, pp. 638–642 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Walkinshaw, N., Lambeau, B., Damas, C., Bogdanov, K., Dupont, P.: STAMINA: a competition to encourage the development and assessment of software model inference techniques. Empir. Softw. Eng. 18(4), 791–824 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wieman, R., Aniche, M.F., Lobbezoo, W., Verwer, S., van Deursen, A.: An experience report on applying passive learning in a large-scale payment company. In: ICSME, pp. 564–573 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zakirzyanov, I., Shalyto, A., Ulyantsev, V.: Finding all minimum-size DFA consistent with given examples: SAT-based approach. In: Cerone, A., Roveri, M. (eds.) SEFM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10729, pp. 117–131. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74781-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Ilya Zakirzyanov & Vladimir Ulyantsev

  2. JetBrains Research, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Ilya Zakirzyanov

  3. Faculty of Science, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Antonio Morgado, Alexey Ignatiev & Joao Marques-Silva

  4. ISDCT SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia

    Alexey Ignatiev

Authors
  1. Ilya Zakirzyanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Morgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexey Ignatiev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vladimir Ulyantsev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joao Marques-Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilya Zakirzyanov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain

    Carlos Martín-Vide

  2. Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Alexander Okhotin

  3. Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

    Dana Shapira

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zakirzyanov, I., Morgado, A., Ignatiev, A., Ulyantsev, V., Marques-Silva, J. (2019). Efficient Symmetry Breaking for SAT-Based Minimum DFA Inference. In: Martín-Vide, C., Okhotin, A., Shapira, D. (eds) Language and Automata Theory and Applications. LATA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11417. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13435-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13435-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13434-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13435-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation