Skip to main content

Lower Limb Joint Load Comparison from Subject Specific Musculoskeletal Model Simulation and Direct Measurements on Different Subject with Instrumented Implant During Normal and Abnormal Gait

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Methods, Imaging and Visualization in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II (CMBBE 2021)

Abstract

This study presents lower limb joint load comparison from subject specific musculoskeletal model simulation (MSK-MS) and direct measurements from instrumented implants on post-operative (PO) patients. A case study was considered for MSK-MS gait analysis of a 40-year-old healthy male with 70 kg and 1.86 m height. Reflective adhesive markers were applied on skin surface of selected anatomical points at right and left lower limbs. Orthostatic and dynamic acquisition on normal gait (NG), stiff-knee gait (SKG) and slow running (SR) was performed from ground reaction forces with two force plates at 2 kHz and trajectories of skin markers with eight-camera system at 100 Hz. Subject specific MSK-MS was performed using AnyGait and morphed Twente Lower Extremity Model (TLEM), matching the size and joint morphology of the stick-figure model. Over-determinate kinematic analysis was performed, and motion equations solved with hard and soft constraints. Representative MSK-MS gait cycles were selected at NG, SKG and SR lower limb joint vertical force components at the hip, the knee, and the ankle normalized to body weight (JFz/BW). Internal joint direct measurements of four PO patients’, 61–83 years, average weight 808 N and 1.71 m height, with telemetric Hip I (4-channel), Hip II (8-channel) and knee (9-channel) instrumented implants were selected from Orthoload database with comparable gait to NG, SKG and SR. Statistical measurements presented similar mean JFz/BW at right/left hip, knee, ankle MSK-MS and asymmetric peak values with dominant NG, SKG and SR different variances (p < 0.05). Direct JFz/BW measures contrasted NG with similar hip and knee mean and variance from SKG and SR with different mean and variance. Peak JFz/BW direct measurements presented higher hip and knee values on SR and NG than SKG, with higher values at the knee than the hip on NG and SKG, and the opposite on SR. Direct JFz/BW measurements presented at the hip and the knee lower values than their corresponding MSK-MS on NG, SKG and SR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bergmann, G., et al.: Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 34(2001), 859–871 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erdemir, A., McLean, S., Herzog, W., van den Bogert, A.J.: Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin. Biomech. 22(2007), 131–154 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lund, M.E., de Zee, M., Andersen, M.S., Rasmussen, J.: On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med. 226(2), 82–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horsman, M.D.K.: The Twente lower extremity model: consistent dynamic simulation of the human locomotor apparatus. PhD thesis University of Twente, Netherlands (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen, M.S., de Zee, M., Rasmussen, J.: Assignment for the Course in Musculoskeletal Modeling by Multibody Biomechanics, 2nd edn. Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Aalborg University, Aalborg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen, M.S., Damsgaard, M., Rasmussen, J.: Kinematic analysis of over-determinate biomechanical systems. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 12(4), 371–384 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen, M.S., Damsgaard, M., MacWilliams, B., Rasmussen, J.: A computationally efficient optimization-based method for parameter identification of kinematically determinate and over-determinate biomechanical systems. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 13(2), 171–183 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bendat, J.S., Piersol, A.G.: Random Data Analysis and Measurement Procedures, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergmann, G.: OrthoLoad. Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bergmann, G. (ed.): Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin. http://www.OrthoLoad.com. Accessed 11 May 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodrigues, C., Correia, M., Abrantes, J., Rodrigues, M., Nadal, J. (2023). Lower Limb Joint Load Comparison from Subject Specific Musculoskeletal Model Simulation and Direct Measurements on Different Subject with Instrumented Implant During Normal and Abnormal Gait. In: Tavares, J.M.R.S., Bourauel, C., Geris, L., Vander Slote, J. (eds) Computer Methods, Imaging and Visualization in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II. CMBBE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10015-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10015-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10014-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10015-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics