Zusammenfassung
During his time at the Institute for Advanced Study, Kurt Gödel became a close friend of Albert Einstein, and in particular studied the theory of relativity. One result of this study was the discovery of the so-called Gödel universe (strictly speaking, it is about a whole class of universes; the singular form stands here as a collective noun.), a model of Einstein’s field equations of general relativity in which no absolute time can be defined. Theoretically, time travel would be possible in such a universe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Strictly speaking, it is about a whole class of universes; the singular form stands here as a collective noun.
- 2.
“Can we really infer the nonexistence of time in this world from its absence from a merely possible universe? In a word, yes. Or so Gödel argues” (Yourgrau, 2005, p. 130).
- 3.
Compare Gödel (1956, p. 412).
- 4.
Oskar Morgenstern in a letter to Bruno Kriesky, the Austrian Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs, Oct. 25, 1965, (Morgenstern, 2002): “Einstein often told me that in the last years of his life he always sought Gödel’s company in order to be able to discuss with him. Once he said to me that his own work no longer meant much, that he merely came to the Institute building to have ‘the privilege of walking home with Gödel’”
- 5.
Note Minkowski’s astonishment at Einstein’s mathematical achievements, handed down by Max Born: Oh, Einstein, he was always skipping lectures—I wouldn’t have believed it of him. From Constance Reid comes the following quote of Minkowski (Reid, 1970, p. 112): Einstein’s presentation of his deep theory is mathematically awkward—I can say that because he got his mathematical education in Zurich from me.
- 6.
Gödel (1956, p. 412).
- 7.
Gödel (1956, p. 412).
- 8.
With this evaluation we are in contrast to Yourgrau, who writes: “First, he remarks that in an attempt to ‘specify’ the above definition of ‘cosmic’ or ‘absolute’ time, arbitrary elements come into play which can never be fully eliminated” (Yourgrau, 2002, p. 276, our emphasis). Here, we refer to footnote 9 in Gödel (1949a). There, however, Gödel only opposes a precise definition of absolute time in the sense of Jeans, and instead of “never” Gödel carefully speaks of “perhaps”, even if he subsequently considers the existence of such a precise definition as doubtful. Regardless of any precise definition of absolute time that Jeans may have had in mind, one certainly cannot imply to Gödel that all forms of physical completion of relativity could be accomplished only by arbitrary elements. This follows already from his own considerations, which will be briefly addressed below.
- 9.
Gödel says this explicitly at the end of the quotation given in footnote 12.
- 10.
From this perspective, Yourgrau’s harsh criticism of Hawking (Yourgrau, 2005, pp. 8 and 136) is both incomprehensible and unjustified.
- 11.
This remark can be found as an “addition by the author in the German translation to footnote 14” only in the German edition of the article.
- 12.
This can be found again in an “addition of the author to footnote 11 of the German edition”, which is introduced as follows (Gödel, 1956, p. 411): A second reason to exclude the above universes a priori could be found in the possibility of a “telegraphing into one’s own past”. However, the practical difficulties arising in this case are hardly likely to be less [than in the case of the previously discussed time travel]. By the way, the border between practical and principal difficulties is by no means immovable.
- 13.
Here, one may well feel reminded of the Aristotelian distinction between sublunary physics and celestial mechanics.
- 14.
The terminology used by Gödel is not unproblematic. In which concrete sense the presented position should correctly be called idealistic may be discussed. The tension is increased by the fact that Gödel himself is usually regarded as a realist; see, e.g. Yourgrau (2005, p. 171 f.).
- 15.
- 16.
Howard Stein (1990), in his introduction to the reprint of the article Gödel (1949a), explicitly regrets the lack of more material that would shed light on Gödel’s philosophical position, especially vis-á-vis Kant. We at least have more detailed drafts of this article, in which “idealistic philosophy” was replaced by “Kantian philosophy” in the title, and which are dated 1946–49 (Gödel, 1995).
References
Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 17, 891–921.
Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Annalen der Physik, 354(7), 769–822.
Gödel, K. (1930). Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalküls. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 37, 349–360.
Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173–198.
Gödel, K. (1933). Zur intuitionistischen Arithmetik und Zahlentheorie. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4, 34–38.
Gödel, K. (1938). The consistency of the axiom of choice and of the generalized continuum-hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 24, 556–557.
Gödel, K. (1949a). A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist (pp. 555–562). Harper & Row.
Gödel, K. (1949b). An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einstein’s field equations of gravitation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21(3), 447– 450.
Gödel, K. (1956). Eine Bemerkung über die Beziehungen zwischen der Relativitätstheorie und der indealistischen Philosophie. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), Albert Einstein als Philosoph und Naturforscher (pp. 406–412). Kohlhammer (Translation of Gödel, 1949a with important additions in two footnotes).
Gödel, K. (1958). Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes. Dialectica, 12, 280–287.
Gödel, K. (1995). Some observations about the relationship between theory of relativity and Kantian philosophy. In S. Feferman, et al. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel—Collected works (Vol. III, pp. 230–259). Oxford University Press (Drafts from Gödel’s Nachlass for the article Gödel, 1949a).
Hawking, S. W. (1992). Chronology protection conjecture. Physical Review D, 46(2), 603–611.
Hilbert, D. (1918). Axiomatisches Denken. In Mathematische Annalen 78.3/4 (pp. 405– 415). (Talk delivered at the Swiss Mathematical Society on September 11, 1917).
Jeans, J. (1935). Man and the universe (pp. 22–23). Sir Halley Steward Lecture.
Morgenstern, O. (2002). Brief an Bruno Kreisky. In E. Köhler, et al. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel – Wahrheit und Beweisbarkeit (Vol. I: Dokumente und historische Analysen, pp. 23–24). öbv & hpt.
Németi, I., Madarász, J., Andréka, H., & Andai, A. (2010). Visualizing some ideas about Gödel-type rotating universes. In M. Scherfner & M. Plaue (Eds.), Gödel-type spacetimes: History and new developments (Vol. X. Collegium Logicum, pp. 77–127). Kurt Gödel Society.
Reid, C. (1970). Hilbert. Springer.
Stein, H. (1990). Introduction note to 1949a. In S. Feferman, et al. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel—Collected works (Vol. II. “1949a” ist der Artikel Gödel, 1949a, pp. 199–201). Oxford University Press.
Yourgrau, P. (2002). Philosophische Betrachtungen zu Gödels Kosmologie. In B. Buldt, et al. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel – Wahrheit und Beweisbarkeit (Vol. II: Kompendium zum Werk, pp. 269–288). öbv & hpt.
Yourgrau, P. (2005). A world without time. Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kahle, R. (2023). The Philosophical Meaning of the Gödel Universe. In: Passon, O., Benzmüller, C., Falkenburg, B. (eds) On Gödel and the Nonexistence of Time – Gödel und die Nichtexistenz der Zeit. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67045-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67045-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-67044-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-67045-3
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)