Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of female and male comic strip characters II: Favorability and identification are different dimensions

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identification ratings of 20 daily newspaper comic strip characters replicated a prediction that male characters would elicit greater identification than female characters, even though previous research had reported the favorability of Adjective Generation Technique (AGT) descriptions for female characters to be equivalent to or greater than that for male characters depending upon primary or secondary familiarity. Significant interaction findings affirming greater same-sex identification by both male and female subjects occurred within a context of significantly greater same-sex and lesser cross-sex identifications on the part of male subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, B. P. Social behavior: Fact and falsehood. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geipel, J. The cartoon: A short history of graphic comedy and satire. South Brunswick, N.J.: A. S. Barnes, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. Parent identification and filial sex-role behavior: The importance of biological context. In J. K. Cole & R. Dienstbier (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1973. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1974, pp. 125–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyenga, K. B., & Hoyenga, K. T. The question of sex differences. Boston: Little, Brown, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. Theory and research in projective techniques (emphasizing the TAT). New York: Wiley, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1699–1712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potkay, C. E., Potkay, C. R., Boynton, G. J., & Klingbeil, J. A. Perceptions of male and female comic strip characters using the Adjective Generation Technique (AGT). Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potkay, C. R., & Merrens, M. R. Sources of male chauvanism in the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1975, 39, 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to express their thanks to Bem Allen and Kay Hoyenga for their helpful reviews, and to Julie Klingbeil and Greg Boynton for their preliminary assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potkay, C.R., Potkay, C.E. Perceptions of female and male comic strip characters II: Favorability and identification are different dimensions. Sex Roles 10, 119–128 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287751

Keywords

Navigation