Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and establishment of the minimal clinicallyimportant change score of the European Portuguese Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with cervical degenerative spine disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to validate and cross-culturally adapt the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) neck for use in Portuguese patients with cervical spine degenerative disease and define the minimal clinically important change score (MCIC) for this questionnaire and population.

Methods

The COMI translation and cross-cultural adaptation was done following published guidelines. Patients awaiting surgery in a neurosurgical centre completed the COMI, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and EQ-5D questionnaires, a pain visual analog scale (VAS) twice within a 5-to-15-day period, and a Global Treatment Outcome (GTO) question evaluating whether a clinical status change had occurred during that period. The MCIC was obtained through an anchor method by analysis of changes in pre- to postoperative total COMI scores and GTO dichotomized answers.

Results

The COMI first assessment was completed by 101 patients and 72 patients completed both assessments. The questionnaire showed good construct validity (n = 72 patients) as predefined hypotheses were confirmed: scores on each COMI domain correlated with a Spearman ρ > 0.4 with scores for the corresponding domain on other questionnaires and COMI total score displayed good correlation with total NDI score (ρ = 0.67) and EQ-5D total score (ρ = 0.55). Test-retest reliability (n = 72 patients) was confirmed through high intraclass correlation coefficients. The MCIC (n = 76 patients) was calculated as 2 points.

Conclusion

The COMI (neck) psychometric qualities were confirmed, such that it can be considered a valid and reliable questionnaire to be applied in the European Portuguese population with surgical cervical spine degenerative disease, with an MCIC of 2 points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith SS, Stewart ME, Davies BM, Kotter MRN (2021) The prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic spinal cord Compression on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Global Spine J 4597–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220934496

  2. Gulati S, Vangen-Lønne V, Nygaard ØP, Gulati AM, Hammer TA, Johansen TO, Peul WC, Salvesen ØO, Solberg TK (2021) Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a Nationwide Registry-based observational study with patient-reported outcomes. Neurosurgery 15(4):704–711. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyab259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCormick JD, Werner BC, Shimer AL (2013) Patient- reported outcome measures in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl3):367–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Valente Aguiar P, Santos Silva P, Lucas D, Vaz R, Pereira P, Mannion AF (2024) Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and establishment of the minimal clinically important change score of the European Portuguese core outcome measures index in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease. Eur Spine J 2394–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08093-6

  6. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Domingues L, Cruz E (2011) Relação entre a Catastrofização Da Dor, Perceção Da Intensidade Da Dor E Incapacidade Funcional em utentes com dor crónica cervical; Dissertação. de Mestrado em Fisioterapia; Relatório de Projeto de Investigação

  8. Pereira M (2011) Contribuição para a adaptação cultural do Neck Disability Index E caraterização Da prática De Fisioterapia em pacientes com Dor Crónica Cervical. Universidade Nova de Lisboa

  9. Ferreira PL, Ferreira LN, Pereira LN (2013) Contributos para a Validação Da Versão Portuguesa do EQ-5D [Contribution for the validation of the Portuguese version of EQ-5D]. Acta Med Port 26(6):664–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreira PL, Antunes P, Ferreira LN, Pereira LN, Ramos-Goñi JM (2019) A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set. Quality of life research. Int J Qual life Aspects Treat care Rehabilitation 28(12):3163–3175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pochon L, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2016) Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 25(1):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HJ, Yeom JS, Nam Y, Lee NK, Heo YW, Lee SY, Park J, Chang BS, Lee CK, Chun HJ, Mannion AF (2018) Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core Outcome measures Index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Eur Spine J 27(11):2804–2813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5759-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsudaira K, Oka H, Oshima Y, Chikuda H, Taniguchi Y, Matsubayashi Y, Kawaguchi M, Sato E, Murano H, Laurent T, Tanaka S, Mannion AF (2018) Development of the Japanese Core Outcome measures Index (COMI): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1986-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3374–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y

  15. Damasceno LH, Rocha PA, Barbosa ES, Barros CA, Canto FT, Defino HL, Mannion AF (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian–Portuguese language. Eur Spine J 21(7):1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2100-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues AM, Gregório MJ, Sousa RD, Dias SS, Santos MJ, Mendes JM, Coelho PS, Branco JC, Canhão H (2018) Challenges of Ageing in Portugal: data from the EpiDoC Cohort. Acta Med Port 31(2):80–93. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.9817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neifert SN, Martini ML, Yuk F, McNeill IT, Caridi JM, Steinberger J, Oermann EK (2020) Predicting trends in cervical spinal surgery in the United States from 2020 to 2040. World Neurosurg 141:e175–e181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobayashi K, Sato K, Kato F, Kanemura T, Yoshihara H, Sakai Y, Shinjo R, Ohara T, Yagi H, Matsubara Y, Ando K, Nakashima H, Imagama S (2022) Trends in the numbers of spine surgeries and spine surgeons over the past 15 years. Nagoya J Med Sci 84(1):155–162. https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.84.1.155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome measures Index (COMI) for the neck eur. Spine J 21(3):561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morishita Y, Buser Z, D’Oro A, Shiba K, Wang JC (2018) Clinical relationship of degenerative changes between the cervical and lumbar spine. Asian Spine J 12(2):343–348. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Benzel EC, Ghogawala Z (2013) Introduction: cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus 35(1). https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13211

  22. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Maggioni S, Grenat G, Checchia GA, Testa M, Teli MG, Mannion AF (2014) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 23(4):863–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3092-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gadjradj PS, Chin-See-Chong TC, Donk D, Depauw P, Tulder MWV, Harhangi BS (2021) Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Dutch Version of the Core Outcome measures Index for the Neck in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disease of the cervical spine. Neurospine 18(4):798–805. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142682.341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Miekisiak G, Banach M, Kiwic G, Kubaszewski L, Kaczmarczyk J, Sulewski A, Kloc W, Libionka W, Latka D, Kollataj M, Zaluski R (2014) Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Core Outcome measures Index for the neck. Eur Spine J 23(4):898–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3129-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oshima Y, Nagata K, Nakamoto H, Sakamoto R, Takeshita Y, Ohtomo N, Kawamura N, Iizuka M, Ono T, Nakajima K, Higashikawa A, Yoshimoto T, Fujii T, Tanaka S, Oka H, Matsudaira K (2021) Validity of the Japanese core outcome measures index (COMI)-neck for cervical spine surgery: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 30:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06657-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the translators involved in the cross-cultural adaptation and the office clerk at our institution for the important contribution to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Valente Aguiar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valente Aguiar, P., Pereira, P., Mannion, A.F. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and establishment of the minimal clinicallyimportant change score of the European Portuguese Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with cervical degenerative spine disease. Eur Spine J 34, 36–42 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08564-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08564-4

Keywords