Skip to main content
Log in

Noncompliance to iodine supplementation recommendation is a risk factor for iodine insufficiency in Portuguese pregnant women: results from the IoMum cohort

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

After a recommendation for iodine supplementation in pregnancy has been issued in 2013 in Portugal, there were no studies covering iodine status in pregnancy in the country. The aim of this study was to assess iodine status in pregnant women in Porto region and its association with iodine supplementation.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, from April 2018 to April 2019. Pregnant women attending the 1st trimester ultrasound scan were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria were levothyroxine use, gestational age < 10 and ≥ 14 weeks, non-evolutive pregnancy at recruitment and non-signing of informed consent. Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was measured in random spot urine by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

Results

Median UIC was 104 μg/L (IQR 62–189) in the overall population (n = 481) of which 19% had UIC < 50 µg/L. Forty three percent (n = 206) were not taking an iodine-containing supplement (ICS) and median UIC values were 146 µg/L (IQR 81–260) and 74 µg/L (IQR 42–113) in ICS users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.001). Not using an ICS was an independent risk factor for iodine insufficiency [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 6.00 (2.74, 13.16); p < 0.001]. Iodised salt use was associated with increased median iodine-to-creatinine ratio (p < 0.014).

Conclusions

A low compliance to iodine supplementation recommendation in pregnancy accounted for a mild-to-moderately iodine deficiency. Our results evidence the need to support iodine supplementation among pregnant women in countries with low household coverage of iodised salt.

Trial registration number NCT04010708, registered on the 8th July 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. I, D.-H. Iodine in pregnancy. Biological, behavioral and contextual rationale. 2017 12/01/2022]; Available from: www.who.int/elena/titles/bbc/iodine_pregnancy/en/. Accessed 12 Jan 2022

  2. Lee SY (2021) Editorial: consequences of iodine deficiency in pregnancy. Front Endocrinol 12:740239–740239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorrenti S et al (2021) Iodine: its role in thyroid hormone biosynthesis and beyond. Nutrients 13(12):4469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zimmermann MB, Andersson M (2021) Global endocrinology: global perspectives in endocrinology: coverage of iodized salt programs and iodine status in 2020. Eur J Endocrinol 185(1):R13–R21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bath SC et al (2013) Effect of inadequate iodine status in UK pregnant women on cognitive outcomes in their children: results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Lancet 382(9889):331–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Levie D et al (2019) Association of maternal iodine status with child IQ: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104(12):5957–5967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination: a guide for programme managers, third edition. 2007.

  8. Saúde, D.G.d., Orientação nº 011/2013: Aporte de iodo em mulheres na preconcepção, gravidez e amamentação, D.G.d. Saúde, Editor. 2013.

  9. Limbert E et al (2010) Iodine intake in Portuguese pregnant women: results of a countrywide study. Eur J Endocrinol 163(4):631–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Costeira MJ et al (2009) Iodine status of pregnant women and their progeny in the Minho Region of Portugal. Thyroid 19(2):157–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmermann MB (2007) The adverse effects of mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency during pregnancy and childhood: a review. Thyroid 17(9):829–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Costa Leite J et al (2017) Iodine status and iodised salt consumption in Portuguese school-aged children: the Iogeneration study. Nutrients 9(5):458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prevention, C.f.D.C.a. Iodine and Mercury in Urine: NHANES 2011-2012: Method 3002.1. 6 December 2016]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_11_12/uiouhg_g_met_iodine_mercury.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2022

  14. Coelho, C., et al., Iodine Supplemention in Portugal – Survey on Current Clinical Practices. Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa, 2021. 15 (supl): 52–53. Available from: http://www.fspog.com/fotos/editor2/07_comunicac_%C2%BAo_aes_livres_obstetri_%C3%BCcia.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2022

  15. Tanda ML et al (2019) Iodine supplementation in women of reproductive age: a survey of clinical practice among Italian gynecologists and midwives. J Endocrinol Invest 42(3):353–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Magri F et al (2019) Poverty and immigration as a barrier to iodine intake and maternal adherence to iodine supplementation. J Endocrinol Invest 42(4):435–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Samson L et al (2021) Lower educational status interferes with maternal iodine intake during both pregnancy and lactation. Endocr Connect 10(7):742–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurberg P et al (2004) Iodine nutrition in breast-fed infants is impaired by maternal smoking. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(1):181–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersen SL et al (2014) Challenges in the evaluation of urinary iodine status in pregnancy: the importance of iodine supplement intake and time of sampling. Eur Thyroid J 3(3):179–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Monaghan AM (2021) Associations between maternal urinary iodine assessment, dietary iodine intakes and neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr 14(1):14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leung AM, Pearce EN, Braverman LE (2009) Iodine content of prenatal multivitamins in the United States. N Engl J Med 360(9):939–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Darrouzet E et al (2014) The sodium/iodide symporter: State of the art of its molecular characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1838(1 Part B):244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pesce L, Kopp P (2014) Iodide transport: implications for health and disease. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2014(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Censi S et al (2019) The effects of iodine supplementation in pregnancy on iodine status, thyroglobulin levels and thyroid function parameters: results from a randomized controlled clinical trial in a mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency area. Nutrients 11(11):2639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexander EK, Pearce EN, Brent GA, Brown RS, Chen H, Dosiou C, Grobman WA, Laurberg P, Lazarus JH, Mandel SJ, Peeters RP, Sullivan S (2017) Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid 27(3):315–389

  26. Rotondi M et al (2018) Management of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a comment from the italian society of endocrinology and the italian thyroid association to the 2017 American Thyroid Association Guidelines-"The Italian Way". Thyroid 28(5):551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Delshad H et al (2021) Lodine supplementation for pregnant women: a cross-sectional national interventional study. J Endocrinol Invest 44(10):2307–2314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuay LK et al (2021) Pregnant women are iodine deficient while school-aged children demonstrate adequate iodine status in Sarawak Malaysia. Food Nutr Bull 42(3):406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baldini E et al (2019) Lodine status in schoolchildren and pregnant women of Lazio, a Central Region of Italy. Nutrients 11(7):1647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ittermann T et al (2020) Standardized map of iodine status in Europe. Thyroid 30(9):1346–1354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferreira P et al (2021) The association of milk and dairy consumption with iodine status in pregnant women in Oporto region. Br J Nutr 126(9):1314–1322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinheiro C et al (2021) Iodine knowledge is associated with iodine status in Portuguese pregnant women: results from the IoMum cohort study. Br J Nutr 126(9):1331–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Polonia J et al (2014) Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension and salt intake in Portugal: changes over a decade. The PHYSA study. J Hypertens 32(6):1211–1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Olivieri A et al (2022) Salt reduction and iodine intake in Italy. J Endocrinol Invest 45(4):883–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pearce EN et al (2016) Consequences of iodine deficiency and excess in pregnant women: an overview of current knowns and unknowns. Am J Clin Nutr 104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):918S-923S

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

With this work we intend to honour Professor Nuno Montenegro for his deep dedication to women's health, always valuing the importance of science for that final good. It was with great regret that we saw him leave too soon. Without the dedication of Professor Nuno Montenegro, the IoMum study would not have been possible. The authors would also like to acknowledge the kind participation of all pregnant women and the support of recruitment activities by health-care professionals from the Department of Obstetrics of Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

This article was supported by National Funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia,I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDB/4255/2020); LAQV (reference UIDB/50006/2020) and through FCT postdoctoral fellowship (V.C.F., grant number SFRH/BPD/109153/2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CMC: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, visualization, funding acquisition; JG: Investigation; IB: investigation, writing—review and editing; NXM: investigation, writing—review and editing; CP: investigation; PF: investigation; DP: investigation, methodology, funding acquisition; IBM: investigation; AC: resources; CP: resources; CM: resources; EP: investigation, writing—review and editing; AA: investigation, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition; CD-M: investigation, funding acquisition; CCD: formal analysis, writing—review and editing; AM-R: methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; LFR de A: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; VCF: investigation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition; CR: methodology, resources, investigation, writing—review and editing; CC: conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition; A-LB: methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing; JCL: conceptualization, methodology, supervision; EK: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Keating.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João. All participants were included upon informed consent signature.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matta Coelho, C., Guimarães, J., Bracchi, I. et al. Noncompliance to iodine supplementation recommendation is a risk factor for iodine insufficiency in Portuguese pregnant women: results from the IoMum cohort. J Endocrinol Invest 45, 1865–1874 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01813-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01813-7

Keywords

Navigation