Abstract
This paper aims at a partial rehabilitation of E. A. Moody's characterization of the 14th century as an age of rising empiricism, specifically by contrasting the conception of the natural science of psychology found in the writings of a prominent 13th-century philosopher (Thomas Aquinas) with those of two 14th-century philosophers (John Buridan and Nicole Oresme). What emerges is that if the meaning of empiricism can be disengaged from modern and contemporary paradigms, and understood more broadly in terms of a cluster of epistemic doctrines concerned with the methodology of knowing, it characterizes very appropriately some of the differences between the ways in which late-medieval thinkers both understood and practised the science of psychology. In particular, whereas Aquinas thinks psychology is about reasoning demonstratively to the real nature of the soul from its evident operations (thereby assimilating psychology to metaphysics), Buridan and Oresme, both of whom doubt whether real animate natures can be known empirically, focus on giving detailed accounts of those operations themselves (thereby assimilating psychology to physics).
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, Marilyn McCord: 1987, William Ockham, 2 vols., University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Adams, Marilyn McCord: 1990, ‘Ockham's Individualisms', in Vossenkuhl and Schönberger (1990), pp. 3–24.
Aquinas, Thomas: 1884, Opera Omnia, Tomus II: Commentaria in Octo Libros Physicorum Aristotelis, Commissio Leonina, Roma.
Aquinas, Thomas: 1889, Opera Omnia, Tomus V: Pars Prima Summae Theologiae: A Quaestione L ad Questionem CXIX, Commissio Leonina, Roma.
Aquinas, Thomas: 1918, Opera Omnia, Tomus XIII: Summa Contra Gentiles, Commissio Leonina, Roma.
Aquinas, Thomas: 1984, Opera Omnia, Tomus XLV,1: Sentencia Libri De Anima, Commissio Leonina, Roma.
Aquinas, Thomas: 1984, Opera Omnia, Tomus XLV,2: Sentencia Libri De Sensu et Sensato, Commissio Leonina, Roma.
Augustine: 1984, City of God, Henry Bettenson (tr.), Penguin, New York.
Bogen, James, and James E. McGuire (eds.): 1985, How Things Are: Studies in Predication and the History and Philosophy of Science, Reidel, Boston.
Boh, Ivan: 1982, ‘Consequences', in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg (1982), pp. 300–314.
Buridan, John: 1509, Subtilissimae Quaestiones super octo Physicorum libros Aristotelis, Paris. Rpr. 1964, as Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Physik, Minerva, Frankturt a. M.
Buridan, John: 1513, Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum, Paris. Rpr. 1968, as Super decem libros Ethicorum, Minerva, Frankturt a. M.
Buridan, John: 1518, In Metaphysicen Aristotelis Questiones argutissimae, Paris.Rpr. 1964, as Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Metaphysik, Minerva, Frankturt a. M. (The original publication date is incorrectly given as 1588 on the frontispiece of the reprint.)
Buridan, John: 1976, Tractatus de consequentiis, édition critique, ed. Hubert Hubien, Philosophes Médiévaux, Tome XVI, Publications universitaires, Louvain-Paris.
Clagett, Marshall: 1959, The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Crawford, F. Stuart (ed.): 1953, Averrois Cordubensis: Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima Libros, Medieval Academy of America, Cambridge, MA.
Denifle, Heinrich, O. P. and Emile Chatelain: 1889–91, Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, Vols. 1–2, Delalain, Paris.
Dronke, Peter (ed.): 1988, A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gillespie, Charles C. (ed.): 1970, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 18 vols., Scribner's, New York.
Grant, Edward: 1977, Physical Science in the Middle Ages, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Grant, Edward: 1993, ‘Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme on Natural Knowledge', Vivarium 31, 84–105.
Hansen, Bert: 1985, Nicole Oresme and the Marvels of Nature, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Toronto.
Hubien, Hubert (ed.): Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Posteriorum Analyticorum, unpublished typescript.
Hubien, Hubert (ed.): Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Priorum Analyticorum, unpublished typescript.
Jordan, Mark: 1986, Ordering Wisdom: The Hierarchy of Philosophical Discourses in Aquinas, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Kretzmann, Norman: 1977, ‘Socrates is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White', Noûs 11, 3–15.
Kretzmann, Norman, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg (eds.): 1982, TheCambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Kretzmann, Norman and Eleonore Stump (eds.): 1993, The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lang, Helen S.: 1989, ‘Aristotelian Physics: Teleological Procedure in Aristotle, Thomas, and Buridan', The Review of Metaphysics 42, 569–91.
Long, A. A. and D. Sedley: 1987, The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol.1, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Maier, Anneliese: 1958, ZwischenPhilosophie undMechanik, Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik, Bd. V, Storia e Letteratura, Roma.
Maier, Anneliese: 1968, Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie, Storia e Letteratura, Roma.
Marshall, Peter: 1980, ‘Nicolas Oresme's Quaestiones super libros Aristotelis de anima: A Critical Edition with Introduction and Commentary', Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
MacDonald, Scott: 1993, ‘Theory of Knowledge’, in Kretzmann and Stump (1993), pp.160–195.
McKeon, Richard (ed.): 1941, The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York.
Moody, E. A.: 1958, ‘Empiricism and Metaphysics in Medieval Philosophy', The Philosophical Review 67, 145– 63. Rpr. in Moody 1975, pp. 287–304.
Moody, E. A.: 1970, ‘Buridan, Jean', in Gillespie (1970), Vol. 2, pp. 603–608.
Moody, E.A.: 1975, Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Science, and Logic: Collected Papers, 1933–1969, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Murdoch, John E.: 1982, ‘The Analytic Character of Late Medieval Learning: Natural Philosophy without Nature', in Roberts (1982), pp. 171–213.
Normore, Calvin: 1985, ‘Buridan's Ontology', in Bogen and McGuire (1985), pp. 194–201.
Patar, Benoî t: 1991, La Traité de l'âme de Jean Buridan [De prima lectura], Philosophes Médiévaux, Tome XXIX, Éditions de l'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, Louvain-La-Neuve.
Roberts, Lawrence D. (ed.): 1982, Approaches to Nature in the Middle Ages, Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, Binghamton.
Serene, Eileen: 1982, ‘Demonstrative Science', in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg (1982), pp. 496–517.
Sobol, Peter Gordon: 1984, ‘John Buridan on the Soul and Sensation: An Edition of Book II of His Commentary on Aristotle's Book of the Soul, with an Introduction and a Translation of Question 18 on Sensible Species', Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Stump, Eleonore: 1989, Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
Sylla, Edith: 1973, ‘Medieval Concepts of the Latitude of Forms: The Oxford Calculators', Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 40, 223–83.
Sylla, Edith: 1982, ‘The Oxford Calculators', in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg (1982), pp. 540–563.
Tweedale, Martin: 1988, ‘Logic (i): Fromthe Late Eleventh Century to the Time of Abelard', in Dronke (1988), pp. 196–226.
Vossenkuhl, Wilhelm, and Rolf Schönberger (eds.): 1990, Die Gegenwart Ockhams, VCH Acta humaniora, Weinheim.
Wolter, Allan B., O.F.M.: 1986, Duns Scotus on the Will and Morality, Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.
Wood, Rega and Gedeon, Gál, O.F.M. (eds.): 1990, Adam de Wodeham: Lectura Secunda in Librum Primum Sententiarum: Prologus et Distinctio Prima, St. Bonaventure University Press, St. Bonaventure, NY.
Zupko, John Alexander: 1989, ‘John Buridan's Philosophy of Mind: An Edition and Translation of Book III of his ‘Questions on Aristotle's De anima', (Third Edition), with Commentary and Critical and Interpretative Essays', Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Zupko, Jack: 1993a, ‘How are Souls Related to Bodies?: A Study of John Buridan', Review of Metaphysics 46, 575–601.
Zupko, Jack: 1993b, ‘Buridan and Skepticism', Journal of the History of Philosophy 31, 191–221.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zupko, J. WHAT IS THE SCIENCE OF THE SOUL? A CASE STUDY IN THE EVOLUTION OF LATE MEDIEVAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. Synthese 110, 297–334 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004969404080
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004969404080