Skip to main content
Log in

Demand and cost forecast error sensitivity analyses in aggregate production planning by possibilistic linear programming models

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A production management system contains many imprecise natures. The conventional deterministic and/or stochastic model in a computer integrated production management system (CIPMS) may not capture the imprecise natures well. This study examines how the imprecise natures in the CIPMS affect the planning results. Possibilistic linear programming models are also proposed for the aggregate production planning problem with imprecise natures. The proposed model can adequately describe the imprecise natures in a production system and, in doing so, the CIPMS can adapt to a variety of non-crisp properties in an actual system. For comparison, the classic aggregate production planning problem given by Holt, Modigliani, and Simon (HMS) is solved using the proposed possibilistic model and the crisp model of Hanssmann and Hess (HH). Perturbing the cost coefficients and the demand allows one to simulate the imprecise natures of a real world and evaluate the effect of the imprecise natures to production plans by both the possibilistic and the crisp HH approaches. Experimental results indicate that the possibilistic model does provide better plans that can tolerate a higher spectrum of imprecise properties than those obtained by the crisp HH model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barman, S. and Tersine, R. J. (1991) Sensitivity of cost coefficient errors in aggregate production planning. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 19(1), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, E. M. L. (1955) On minimizing a convex function subject to linear inequalities. Journal of Royal Statistist Society, B17, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. E. and Zadeh, L. A. (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17, B141-B164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. J. (1990) Stochastic versus possibilistic programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 34, 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Symonds, G. H. (1958) Cost horizons and certainty equivalents: an approach to stochastic programming of heating oil. Management Science, 4, 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 5, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G. B. (1955) Linear programming under uncertainty. Management Science, 1, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Verdegay, J. L. and Vila, M. A. (1987) Imprecise costs in mathematical programming problems. Control and Cybernet, 16, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssmann, F. and Hess, S. W. (1960) A linear programming approach to production and employment scheduling. Management Technology. 1, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. C., Modigliani, F., and Simon, H. A. (1955) A linear decision rule for production and employment scheduling, Management Science, 2(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. C., Modigliani, F., and Muth, J. (1956) Derivation of a linear decision rule for production and employment, Management Science, 2, 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M. M. (1985) Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y.-J. and Hwang, C.-L. (1992) A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, C. E. and Turner, M. (1993) Note on utilizing stochastic optimal control in aggregate production planning. European Journal of Operational Research. 65, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhandjula, M. K. (1987), Linear programming with a possibilistic objective function. European Journal of Operational Research. 31, 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellichamp, J. M. and Love, R. M. (1978) Production switching heuristics for the aggregate planning problem. Management Science, 24(12), 1242–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommelfanger, H., Hanuscheck, R. and Wolf, J. (1989) Linear programming with fuzzy objectives. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommelfanger, H. (1989) Interactive decision making in fuzzy linear optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 41, 210–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, L. (1989) User's Manual for Linear, Integer, and Quadratic Programming with LINDO. The Scientific Press, South San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, R.F.C. (1994) Aggregate production planning by stochastic control. European Journal of Operational Research, 73, 346–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., Ichihashi, H. and Asai, K. (1984) A formulation of fuzzy linear programming problem based on comparison of fuzzy numbers. Control and Cybernet., 13, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H. and Asai, K. (1984) Fuzzy solution in fuzzy linear programming problems. IEEE Trans. System, Man Cybernet., 14, 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wets, R. J. B. (1989) Stochastic programming. In Handbooks in Operation Research and Management Science: Optimization, Nemhauser, G. L., Rinnooy Kan A. H. G. and Todd, M. J. (eds), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 573–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazenin, A. V. (1987) Fuzzy and stochastic programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 22, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. J. (1991) Fuzzy Set Theory andits applications, second edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London, pp. 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsieh, S., Wu, MS. Demand and cost forecast error sensitivity analyses in aggregate production planning by possibilistic linear programming models. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11, 355–364 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008974118527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008974118527

Navigation