Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of the issues arising from work with multiple stakeholders within the context of a major national evaluation study. The context is the UK Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative (EDSI), which was jointly funded by the four education departments of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Unusually, the evaluation, which was large scale and employed several teams of evaluators, had a real opportunity to inform the development of policy. Problems of working for multiple stakeholders arose from the tight control that the sponsors exercised over the structure, style and content of the report. In addition to the usual problems of conflicting interests between stakeholders, the Scottish evaluators experienced problems relating to the polarised political context in the UK prior to the general election of 1997. The successful public relations exercise that created the EDSI programme, with commercial sponsorship for projects and government funding only for the evaluation, was an additional factor in determining the evaluators' roles and relationships with stakeholders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DfEE. (1995) Superhighways for Education. London: HMSO.
DfEE. (1997) Preparing for the Information Age: Synoptic Report of the Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative. London: DfEE.
Greene, Jennifer C. (1996) Qualitative Evaluation and Scientific Citizenship: reflections and refractions, Evaluation, 2(3), 277–289.
Hall, J., McPake, J., and Somekh, B. (1997) Scottish Superhighways Evaluation: Final Report. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Heseltine, Michael. (1995) The Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative House, Ernest R. (1974) The Politics of Educational Innovation. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Co.
Karlsson, Ove. (1996) A Critical Dialogue in Evaluation: how can the interaction between evaluation and politics be tackled? Evaluation, 2(4), 405–416.
Kemmis, Stephen. (1987) Schools, Computing and Educational Reform, pp. 289-306 in Patton, Michael Quinn. (1982) Practical Evaluation. Newbury Park CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.
Patton, Michael Quinn. (1982) Practical Evaluation. Newbury Park CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.
Peshkin, Alan. (1988) In Search of Subjectivity: One's Own, Educational Researcher, October, 17–21.
Ritzima, Robin. (1996) Oral Presentation to the EDSI Evaluation Conference, November 1996.
Solstad, K.J. (1994) Equity at Risk. National Education Office, Nordland County, Norway.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Somekh, B., McPake, J. & Hall, J. Serving multiple stakeholders: Issues arising from a major national evaluation study. Education and Information Technologies 4, 261–278 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009640109517
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009640109517