Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supporting Student Discussions: it isn't Just Talk

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of dialogue in learning is considered with respect to the use of educational technology. The Vicarious Learner project aims to create a re-usable resource base of learning dialogues from which later learners can benefit. This depends on effective dialogues arising within computer-based media, so that they can be captured. The conditions for effective dialogue are dependent not only on the technology, but on structures and conventions surrounding its use. Two studies are described, from which it emerges that new structures are needed. A notion of Task Directed Discussions (TDDs) is developed, through which effective dialogues are explicitly encouraged. A theoretical framework for the re-use of such dialogues is described. © IFIP, published by Kluwer Academic Publishers

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adelman, C. (1981) Uttering, Muttering: Collecting, Using and Reporting Talk for Social and Educational Research, London: Grant McIntyre Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestri, D. P., Ehrmann, S. C. and Ferguson, D. L. (1992) Learning to Design, Designing to Learn: Using Technology to Transform the Curriculum, New York and London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball-Rokeach, S. and DeFleur, M. L. (1976) A Dependency Model of Mass Media Effects, Communication Research, 3, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., Britton, J. and Rosen, H. (1971) Language, the Learner and the School, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, D. (Ed.) (1986) Teach Thinking by Discussion, Surrey: SHRE & NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J. (1970) Language and Learning, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, M. (1986) The Development of Trust in Learning Groups, In D. Bligh, (Ed.), Teach Thinking by Discussion, Surrey: SHRE & NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1996) Using Language, Cambridge U P, Cambridge.

  • Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. (1991) Grounding in Communication, in L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127–49.

  • Collins and Ferguson, (1993) Epistemic Forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry, Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, T. and Thorn, B. K. (1991) Discretionary Data bases: Theory, data, and implications. In J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 219–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1976) A Theory of Semiotics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1993) Discursive Psychology, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1983) An introduction to Group Dynamics, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1992) Discussion with More Students, Cambridge: Oxonian Rewley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D. (1989) Some CMC Discourse Properties and their Educational Significance. In Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education, R. Mason and A. Kaye, (eds.) Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graessar, A. C. and Person, N. K. (1994) Question asking During Tutoring, American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, R. (1993) Beyond Superstructuralism, London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, F. (1991) Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis. In O'Malley, C. (ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaLiberte, D. (1995) HyperNews, http://union.ncsa.uiuc.edu:80/HyperNews/get/hypernews. html.

  • Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Education, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1991) Thinking in Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1987) Towards a ‘Critical Mass’ Theory of Interactive Media: Universal Access, Interdependence and Diffusion, Communication Research, 14(15), 491–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1991) Methodologies for Evaluating Applications of Computer Conferencing. In Kaye, A. R. (ed.) Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, Heidelberg: Verlag-Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, J. T. (1995) Learning Technology and Groundhog Day. In Strong, W., Simpson, V. B., and Slater, D. (eds.) Proceedings of Hypermedia at Work: Practice and Theory in Higher Education, Canterbury: University of Kent at Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaslin, M. and Good, T. (1992) Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational Researcher, 21(3), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1984) Groups: Interaction and performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendree, J., Stenning, K., Mayes, T., Lee J., and Cox, R. (1998, in press) Why Observing a Dialogue may Benefit Learning: The Vicarious Learner. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(2), 110–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. and Windahl, S. (1993) Communication Models: for the study of mass communication. (2nd Ed.) London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, N. and Norman, D. A. (1979) To Ask a Question, One Must Know Enough to Know What is Not Known, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 357–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison and Collins, (1995) Epistemic Fluency and Constructivist Learning Environments, Educational Technology Journal, 35(5), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. R., Webb, B. and Cochrane, C. (1995) A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning, International Computing and Technology: An electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1991) The Theory of Public Opinion: The Concept of the Spiral of Silence, in Anderson, J. (ed.) Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, pp. 256–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1989) Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD: Proceedings (1996) Adult Learning in a New Technological Era, OECD: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (1995) Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling, In Reimann, P. and Spada, H. (Eds). Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. F. (1995) Pedagogical Techniques for Computer-Mediated Communication, http://www.hs.nki.no/,morten/cmcped.htm.

  • Perkins, (1997) Epistemic Games, International Journal of Educational Research, Chapter 5, pp. 49–61.

  • Phillips, A. F. and Pease, P. S. (1987) Computer conferencing and education: complementary or contradictory concepts?, American Journal of Distance Education, 1(2), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1929) The Child's Conception of the World, (trans. Joan and Andrew Tomlinson) Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, R. and Mallen, C. (1996) Dialogue Games to Support Reasoning and Reflection in Diagnostic Tasks, Proceedings of EuroAIED, Lisbon: Edições Colibri, pp. 213–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, W. (1996) The future of Face-to-Face and Distance Technology in Post-Secondary Education, Informative Technology and the Future of Post Secondary Education, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. and Chapman, S. H. (1990) Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of Teaching Methods, School of Education Technical Report, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure (de), F. (1966) Course in General Linguistics, (ed. Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye and Albert Riedlinger, trans. Wade Baskin) McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., and Smith-Lea, N. (1992) Educational Applications of a Networked Communal Database, Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry and Trigg, R. (1996) Epistemic Forms and Epistemic Games, Educational Technology, 36(3), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1992) Towards an Analysis of Discourse, In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances: Spoken Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1993) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organisation, 3rd Edition, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, K., Inder, I. and Neilson, I. (1995) Applying semantic concepts to the media assignment problem in multi-media communication. In B. Chandrasekaran and J. Glasgow (eds.), Diagrammatic Reasoning: Computational and cognitive perspectives on problem solving with diagrams. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, K. and Tobin, R. (1997) Assigning information to modalities: comparing graphical treatments of syllogism. In E. Ejerhed and S. Lindstrom (eds.) Logic, Action and Cognition: Essays in Philosophical Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Cornwall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ur, P. (1991) Discussions that Work: Task-centred fluency practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meij, H. (1988) Constraints on Question Asking in Classrooms, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 401–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F. (1990) Reasoning by argumentation. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (eds.) Learning and instruction: European research in an international context, Vol. 2.1, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 305–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962) Thought and Language. (E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar, eds. and trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MLT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willes, M. (1981) Children Becoming Pupils: A Study of Discourse in Nursery and Reception Classes, In Adelman, C. (Ed). Uttering, Muttering: Collecting, Using and Reporting Talk for Social and Educational Research, London: Grant McIntyre Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Finbar Dineen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean Mckendree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J., Dineen, F. & Mckendree, J. Supporting Student Discussions: it isn't Just Talk. Education and Information Technologies 3, 217–229 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009645430959

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009645430959

Search

Navigation