Abstract
Students' opinions about the opportunities and the implications of VR in instruction were investigated by administering a questionnaire to humanities and engineering undergraduates. The questionnaire invited participants to rate a series of statements concerning motivation and emotion, skills, cognitive styles, benefits and learning outcomes associated with the use of VR in education. The representation which emerged was internally consistent and articulated into specific dimensions. It was not affected by gender, by the previous use of VR software, or by the knowledge of the main topics concerning the introduction of IT in instruction. Also the direct participation in a training session based on an immersive VR experience did not influence such a representation, which was partially modulated by the kind of course attended by students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Antonietti, A. and Cantoia, M. (2000). To see a painting versus to walk in a painting: An experiment on sensemaking through virtual reality. Computers & Education, 34, 213-223.
Antonietti, A. Imperio, E. Rasi C. and Sacco M. (in press) Integration of Virtual Reality and hypermedia in learning the structure and the use of a turning lathe. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Aukstakalnis, S. and Blatner, D. (1992). Silicon Mirage: The Art and Science of Virtual Reality. Peachpit Press, Berkeley.
Colley, A.M. Gale M.T. and Harris, T.A. (1994). Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 129-137.
Day, A.J. and Suri, A.K. (1999). A knowledge-based system for postgraduate engineering course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 14-27.
Francis, L.J. (1993). Measuring attitudes toward computers among undergraduates college students: The affective domain. Computer Education, 20, 251-255.
Ferrington, G. and Loge, K. (1992). Virtual Reality, a new learning environment. The Computing Teacher, 19, 17.
Gardner, D.G. Dukes, R.L. and Discenza, R. (1993). Computer use, self-confidence, and attitudes: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 427-440.
Gentner, D. Stevens, A.L. (eds) (1983). Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kruger, M.W. (1991). Artificial Reality II. Addison-Wesley, New York.
Helsel, S. (1992). Virtual Reality and education. Educational Technology, 32, 38-42.
Larijani, L.C. (1994). The Virtual Reality Primer. McGraw Hill, New York.
Mantovani, G. (1996). New Communication Environment. From Everyday to Virtual. Taylor & Francis, London.
Osberg, K.M. (1995). Virtual Reality and education: where imagination and experience meet. VR in the Schools, 1(2), 1-3.
Pantelidis, V. (1993). Virtual Reality in the classroom. Educational Technology, 33, 23-27.
Perry, T. and Perry, L.A. (1998) University students' attitudes toward multimedia presentations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 375-377.
Shashaani, L. (1993). Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computer. Computers & Education, 20, 169-181.
Smith, B. Caputi, F. and Rawstorne, P. (2000). Differentiating computer experience and attitudes toward computers: An empirical investigation. Computer in Human Behavior, 16, 59-81.
Wexelblat, A. (ed) (1993). Virtual Reality: Applications and Explorations. Academic Press, San Diego.
Wilson, T. and Whitlock, D. (1998). What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-ediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? Computers & Education, 30, 259-269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Antonietti, A., Rasi, C., Imperio, E. et al. The Representation of Virtual Reality in Education. Education and Information Technologies 5, 317–327 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012057608694
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012057608694