Skip to main content
Log in

Integer programming approaches tofacilities layout models with forbidden areas

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The facilities layout problem is concerned with a given number of facilities of somesystem which are to be laid out in a plane region such as a factory floor or a flat buildingsite. The problem has applications, beyond manufacturing, in the design of various types ofgovernment and other public facilities, as well as of buildings for commercial activities.The aim of the classical facilities layout problem is to produce a plan drawn to scale whichshows the relative positions of the facilities to be laid out in order to optimise some measureof the performance of the system. We assume that the region P, in which the facilities are tobe laid out, is a rectangle of integer dimensions and that each of the facilities to be laid outin it is to be a connected subregion of given area, of arbitrary shape, whose boundaries areparallel to the perimeter of P. In many practical layout scenarios, there are regions in whichit is forbidden to locate facilities. This sometimes occurs when a factory is to be redesignedand certain existing facilities are to remain where they are. In other scenarios, the forbiddenregions represent areas which cannot contain any facilities at all, e.g., for security, transport,technical, or other reasons. We devise integer programming models for the facilities layoutproblem with forbidden areas. As a result, we believe that the approaches described representa useful addition to the facilities planner's toolkit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.C. Armour and E.S. Buffa, A heuristic algorithm and simulation approach to relative allocation of facilities, Management Science 9(1963)294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.G. Askin and M.G. Mitwasi, Integrating facility layout with process selection and capacity planning, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Balakrishnan, F.R. Jacobs and M.A. Venkataramanan, Solutions for the constrained dynamic facility layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.S. Bazaraa, Computerized layout design: A branch and bound approach, AIE Transactions 7 (1975)432–437.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.E. Burkard, Quadratic assignment problems, in: Discrete Location Theory, eds. R.L. Francis and L. Mirchandarni, Wiley, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Chajed, B. Montreuil and T.J. Lowe, Flow network design for manufacturing systems layout, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fischetti, H.W. Hamacher, K. Jornsten and F. Maffioli, K-cardinality trees with minimal weight, Technical Report, Pofitecnico di Rilano, Dipartimento di Ellectronica, 1992.

  8. L.R. Foulds, Techniques for facilities layout: Deciding which pairs of activities should be adjacent, Management Science 29(1983)1414–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.R. Foulds, Graph Theory Applications, Springer, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.R. Foulds and H.W. Hamacher, A new integer programming approach to (restricted) facilities layout problems allowing flexible facility shapes, Research Report 1992-3, Department of Management Systems, University of Waikato, New Zealand, March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Golany and M.J. Rosenblatt, A heuristic algorithm for the quadratic assignment formulation to the plant layout problem, International Journal of Production Research 27(1989)293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Hammouche and D.B. Webster, Evaluation of an application of graph theory to the layout problem, International Journal of Production Research 23(1985)987–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C.M. Harmonsky and G.K. Tothero, A multi-factor plant layout methodology, International Journal of Production Research 30(1992)1773–1790.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.M.D. Hassan and G.L. Hogg, A review of graph theory application to the facilities layout problem, OMEGA 15(1987)291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.S. Heragu, Recent models and techniques for solving the layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.S. Heragu and A.S. Alfa, Experimental analysis of simulated annealing based algorithms for the layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.S. Hillier and M.M. Connors, Quadratic assignment problem algorithm and the location of indivisible facilities, Management Science 13(1966)42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.K. Kaku and R. Rachamadugu, Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)224 –230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Kouvelis, W.C. Chiang and J. Fitzsimmons, Simulated annealing for machine layout problems in the presence of zoning constraints, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kusiak and S.S. Heragu, The facility layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research 29(1987)229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Leung, A new graph theoretic heuristic for facility layout, Management Science 38(1992) 594–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R.R. Levary and S. Kalchik, Facilities layout–a survey of solution procedures, Computers and Industrial Engineering 9(1985)141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MGG, EDS, Milton Keynes, England.

  24. R. Ram and N. Viswanadham, Performance and evaluation of cellular flexible manufacturing systems: A decomposition approach, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992) 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S.C. Sarin, P. Loharjun, C.J. Malmborg and B. Krishnakumar, A multiattribute decision-theoretic approach for layout design problem, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sciconic, EDS, Milton Keynes, England.

  27. D.R. Sule, Manufacturing Facilities–Location, Planning and Design, PWS-Kent, Boston, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.A. Tompkins and J.A. White, Facilities Planning, Wiley, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T.L. Urban, Computational performance and efficiency of lower-bound procedures for the dynamic facility layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D.J. van Camp, M.W. Carter and A. Vannelli, A nonlinear optimisation approach for solving facility layout problems, European Journal of Operational Research 57(1992)174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foulds, L.R., Hamacher, H.W. & Wilson, J.M. Integer programming approaches tofacilities layout models with forbidden areas. Annals of Operations Research 81, 405–418 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018925728178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018925728178

Keywords

Navigation