Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical constraint satisfaction of multilateral trade matching in commodity auction markets

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A commodity auction market provides a trading intermediary whose role is to find optimal trade matching between buyers and sellers that satisfies their trading constraints. Some commodity auction markets utilize forms of electronic trading intermediary systems in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of trading of huge volumes of transactions during short periods of time. Previous research works on electronic trading intermediary systems focus on the maximization of the trade volume obtained by satisfying mainly price and quantity constraints. The principal restriction of these approaches is that the heterogeneity of the commodity is ignored or at least not significantly considered. The objective of the study in this paper is to propose a computable mechanism of trading inter-mediaries for commodity auction markets, supporting not only ordinary trading constraints of prices and quantities but also other qualitative and quantitative constraints on the commodity properties and trading conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Cohen, Constraint logic programming languages, Communications of the ACM 33(1990)52–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.E. Dubins and D.A. Freedman, Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley algorithm, The American Mathematical Monthly 88(1981)485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Gale and L.S. Shapley, College admissions and the stability of marriage, The American Mathematical Monthly 69(1962)9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Gale and M. Sotomayer, Ms. Machiavelli and the stable matching problem, The American Mathematical Monthly 92(1985)261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Jaffar and J.L. Lassez, Constraint logic programming, in: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium of the Principles of Programming Languages, Munich, Germany, 1987, pp. 111–119.

  6. J. Jaffar, S. Michaylov, P.J. Stuckey and R. Yap, The CLP(ℜ) language and system, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 14(1993)339–395.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.G. Lee, Intelligent electronic markets for commodity auction: An integrated approach of economic theory and social choice theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Management Science and Information Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, December 1993.

  8. L.S. Shapley and M. Shubik, The assignment game I: The core, International Journal of Game Theory 1(1972)111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.L. Thompson, Pareto optimal, multiple deterministic methods for bid and offer auctions, Methods of Operations Research 35(1979)517–530.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.A. Wilson, Hierarchical constraint logic programming, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Washington, May 1993.

  11. M.A. Wilson and A. Borning, Extending hierarchical constraint logic programming: Nonmonotonicity and inter-hierarchy comparison, in: Proceedings of the 1989 North American Conference on Logic Programming, Cleveland, OH, 1989.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryu, Y.U. Hierarchical constraint satisfaction of multilateral trade matching in commodity auction markets. Annals of Operations Research 71, 317–334 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018927700552

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018927700552

Navigation