Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the question of whether the assumption of the “representativeagent”, often made in economic modeling, is innocuous or whether it may be misleadingunder certain circumstances. In order to obtain some insight into this question, two dynamicCournot duopoly games are considered, whose dynamics are represented by discrete‐timedynamical systems. For each of these models, the dynamical behavior of the duopoly systemwith identical producers is compared to that with quasi‐identical ones, in order to study theeffects of small heterogeneities between the players. In the case of identical players, suchdynamical systems become symmetric, and this implies that synchronized dynamics can beobtained, governed by a simpler one‐dimensional model whose dynamics summarizes thecommon behavior of the two identical players. In both the examples, we show that a negligibledifference between the parameters that characterize the two producers can give dynamicevolutions that are qualitatively different from that of the symmetric game, i.e. a breakingof the symmetry can cause a noticeable effect. The presence of such bifurcations suggeststhat economic systems with quasi‐identical agents may evolve quite differently from systemswith truly identical agents. This contrasts with the assumption, very common in the economicliterature, that small heterogeneities of agents do not matter too much.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Abraham, L. Gardini and C. Mira, Chaos in Discrete Dynamical Systems (A Visual Introduction in Two Dimensions), Springer, Berlin, 1997.
J.C. Alexander, J.A. Yorke, Z. You and I. Kan, Riddled basins, Int. Journal of Bif. and Chaos 2(1992)795-813.
M. Aoki, New Approaches to Macroeconomic Modelling, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996.
W. Arthur, S. Durlauf and D. Lane (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System 11, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.
P. Ashwin, J. Buescu and I. Stewart, From attractor to chaotic saddle: A tale of transverse instability, Nonlinearity 9(1996)703-737.
W.J. Baumol and J. Benhabib, Chaos: Significance, mechanism, and economic applications, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(1989)77-105.
G.I. Bischi and L. Gardini, Focal points and basin fractalization in two classes of rational maps, Proceedings ECIT96, 1997, in press.
G.I. Bischi and A. Naimzada, A dynamic duopoly game with local adaptive response, Mimeo, 1996.
G.I. Bischi and A. Naimzada, Global analysis of a dynamic duopoly game with bounded rationality, in: Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, Vol. 5., Birkhäuser, Boston, 1999, forthcoming.
L. Blume, The statistical mechanism of strategic interaction, Games and Economic Behavior 5(1993)387-424.
J. Buescu, Exotic Attractors, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1997.
P. Collet and J.P. Eckmann, Iterated Maps on the Interval as Dynamical Systems, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1980.
R.L. Devaney, An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems, Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, 1987.
H. Föllmer, Random economies with many interacting agents, Journal of Mathematical Economics 1(1974)51-62.
M. Gallegati and A. Kirman (eds.), Economies with Heterogeneous and Interacting Agents, Elgar, 1998, forthcoming.
I. Gumowski and C. Mira, Dynamique Chaotique, Cepadues Editions, Toulouse, 1980.
A.P. Kirman, Whom or what does the representative individual represent?, Journal of Econ. Perspectives 6(1992)117-136.
P. Krugman, The Self Organising Economy, Blackwell, Oxford, 1996.
Y.C. Lai, C. Grebogi and J.A. Yorke, Riddling bifurcation in chaotic dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett 77(1996)55-58.
J. Milnor, On the concept of attractor, Commun. Math. Phys. 99(1985)177-195.
C. Mira, Chaotic Dynamics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1987.
C. Mira, L. Gardini, A. Barugola and J.C. Cathala, Chaotic Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Non-invertible Maps, World Scientific, Singapore, 1996.
E. Ott and J.C. Sommerer, Blowout bifurcations: The occurrence of riddled basins, Phys. Lett. A 188(1994)39-47.
A.S. Pikovsky and P. Grassberg, Symmetry breaking bifurcation for coupled chaotic attractors, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24(1991)4587-4597.
T. Puu, Chaos in duopoly pricing, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 1(1991)573-581.
T. Puu, Complex dynamics with three oligopolists, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 7(1996)2075-2081.
C. Reick and E. Mosekilde, Emergence of quasiperiodicity in symmetrical coupled, identical period-doubling systems, Phys. Rev. E52(1995)1428-1434.
R.I. Schult, D.B. Cramer, F.S. Henyey and J.A. Wright, Symmetric and nonsymmetric coupled logistic maps, Phys. Rev. A35(1987)3115-3118.
A.N. Sharkovsky, Yu.L. Maistrenko and E.Yu. Romanenko, Difference Equations and Their Applications, Kluwer Academic, 1993.
T. Stoker, Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals, Journal of Economic Literature 31(1993)1827-1874.
S.J. Turnovsky, Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, The MIT Press, 1995.
S.C. Venkataramani, B.R. Hunt, E. Ott, D.J. Gauthier and J.C. Bienfang, Transition to bubbling of chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett, 77(1996)5361-5364.
S.C. Venkataramani, B.R. Hunt and E. Ott, Bubbling transition, Phys. Rev. E54(1996)1346-1360.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bischi, G., Gallegati, M. & Naimzada, A. Symmetry‐breaking bifurcations and representativefirm in dynamic duopoly games. Annals of Operations Research 89, 252–271 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018931824853
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018931824853