Skip to main content
Log in

Unilateral commitment in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we modify the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma by adding an initial round in which the players have the option of simultaneously, unilaterally and publicly committing themselves, in an enforceable way, to a subset of their strategies. We show that when a large enough number of repetitions of the prisoners' dilemma follow this initial commitment round, then not only do the players have incentives to commit themselves to a limited strategy set, but there is also a symmetric subgame perfect equilibrium in which both players act cooperatively throughout the post-commitment stages of the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.E.C. van Damme, Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria, Springer, 1991.

  2. J.N. Friedman, Cooperative equilibria in finite horizon noncooperative supergames, Journal of Economic Theory 35(1985)390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kreps, P. Milgron, J. Roberts and R. Wilson, Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma, Journal of Economic Theory 27(1982)245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Myerson, Communication, correlated equilibria and incentive compatibility, in: Handbook on Game Theory, Vol. 2, eds. R. Aumann and S. Hart, North-Holland, 1994, p. 827.

  5. R. Radner, Collusive behavior in noncooperative epsilon-equilibria of oligopolies with long but finite lives, Journal of Economic Theory 22(1980)136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Selten, Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, International Journal of Game Theory 4(1975)25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Selten, The chain store paradox, Theory and Decision 9(1978)127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Sorin, Repeated games with complete information, in: Handbook on Game Theory, Vol. 1, eds. R. Aumann and S. Hart, North-Holland, 1992, p. 71.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faíña-Medín, A., García-Jurado, I., Méndez-Naya, J. et al. Unilateral commitment in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. Annals of Operations Research 84, 187–194 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018936819942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018936819942

Keywords

Navigation