Skip to main content
Log in

Basic adjoint relation for transient and stationary analysis of some Markovprocesses

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The basic adjoint relation (BAR) was first introduced by Harrison and Williams [21,22] to characterize the stationary distribution of a diffusion process. Through simple examples, we show that this procedure can be used to characterize both the stationary and the transient distributions of a diffusion process, as well as other non‐diffusion Markov processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Abate and W. Whitt, Transient behavior of regulated Brownian motion, I: Starting at the origin, Advances in Applied Probability 19(1987)560-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Abate and W. Whitt, Transient behavior of regulated Brownian motion, II: Non-zero initial nonditions, Advances in Applied Probability 19(1987)599-631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Abate and W. Whitt, Transient behavior of the M/G/1 workload process, Preprint (1991).

  4. S. Asmussen, Applied Probability and Queues, Wiley, Chichester, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Bambos and K. Sigman, On stability of state-dependent queues and acyclic queueing networks, Advances in Applied Probability 14(1992)392-433.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Bardhan and K. Sigman, Rate conservation law for stationary semimartingales, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 7(1993)1-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Brémaud, Point Processes and Queues, Springer, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Browne and K. Sigman, Work-modulaed queues with applications to storage processes, J. Appl. Prob. 29(1992)699-712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Chen, The basic adjoint relationship: A new approach for transient and stationary analysis of a Markov process, Working paper, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia, Canada, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Chen and A. Mandelbaum, Discrete flow networks: Bottleneck analysis and fluid approximations, Math. O.R. 16(1991)408-446.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Chen and A. Mandelbaum, Hierarchical modelling of stochastic networks, Part I: Fluid models, in: Stochastic Modeling and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems, ed. D.D. Yao, Springer, 1994, pp. 47-105.

  12. H. Chen and D.D. Yao, A fluid model for systems with random disruptions, Operations Research 40(1992)S239-S247.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.W. Cohen, The Single Server Queue, North-Holland, 1982.

  14. J.G. Dai, Steady-state analysis of reflected Brownian motions: Characterization, numerical methods and queueing applications, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, 1990.

  15. J.G. Dai and J.M. Harrison, Steady-state analysis of RBM in a rectangle: Numerical methods and a queueing application, Annals of Applied Probability 1(1991)16-35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.G. Dai and J.M. Harrison, Reflected Brownian motion in an orthant: Numerical methods and a queueing application, Annals of Applied Probability 2(1992)65-86.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.G. Dai and T.G. Kurtz, Characterization of the stationary distribution for a semimartingale reflected Brownian motion in a convex polyhedron, Preprint, 1992.

  18. S.N. Ethier and T.G. Kurtz, Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence, Wiley, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.M. Harrison, The supremum distribution of a Levy process with no negative jumps, Advances in Applied Probability 9(1977)417-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.M. Harrison, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems, Wiley, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.M. Harrison and R. Williams, Multidimensional reflected Brownian motions having exponential stationary distributions, Annals Prob. 15(1987)115-137.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.M. Harrison and R. Williams, Brownian models of open queueing networks with homogeneous customer populations, Stochastics 22(1987)77-115.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.M. Harrison, R. Williams and H. Chen, Brownian models of closed queueing networks, Stochastics and Stochastics Reports 29(1990)37-74.

  24. O. Kella and W. Whitt, Useful martingales for stochastic storage processes with Lévy input, Journal of Applied Probability 29(1992)396-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Kella and W. Whitt, A storage model with a two-state random environment, Operations Research 40(1992)S257-S262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Knessl, B.J. Matkowsky, Z. Schuss and C. Tier, A Markov-modulated M/G/1 queue I: Stationary distribution, Queueing Systems 1(1987)355-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Mitra, Stochastic theory of a fluid model of multiple failure-susceptible producers and consumers coupled by a buffer, Advances in Applied Probability 20(1988)646-676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N.U. Prabhu, Stochastic Storage Processes, Springer, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Protter, Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, Springer, 1990.

  30. D. Stoyan, Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models, Wiley, Chichester, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R.W. Wolff, Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, H. Basic adjoint relation for transient and stationary analysis of some Markovprocesses. Annals of Operations Research 87, 273–303 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018937103955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018937103955

Keywords

Navigation