Skip to main content
Log in

Risk programming for agricultural resource allocation: A multidimensional risk approach

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an approach to deal with risk in agricultural decisions. Although the model is in line with the “Prospect ranking theory” and the “Partitioned multiobjective risk method”, which recognise the multidimensional character of any risk measure taken in agricultural decision‐making problems, its behavioural hypothesis and analytical development are totally different. The way in which the approach works is illustrated through a simple but well‐known example in agricultural planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.B.C. Backus, V.R. Eidman V.R. and A. A.Dijkhuizen, Farm decision making under risk uncer-tainty, Netherlands J. Agr. Sci. 45 (1997) 307-328.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Ballestero and C. Romero, A theorem connecting utility function optimization and compromise programming, Opns. Res. Letters 10 (1991) 421-427.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Ballestero and C. Romero, Portfolio selection: A compromise programming solution, J. Oper. Res. Society 47 (1996) 1377-1386.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Blasco, E. Cuchillo-Ibáñez, M.A. Morón and C. Romero, On the monotonicity of the compromise set in multicriteria problems, J. Opt. Theory and Applications 102 (1999) 69-82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.T. Buccola, Testing for nonnormality in farm net returns, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 68 (1986) 334-343.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.L. Cohon, Multiobjective Programming and Planning (Academic Press, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Colson and M. Zeleny, Uncertain Prospects Ranking and Portfolio Analysis under the Conditions of Partial Information (Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Colson and M. Zeleny, Multicriterion concept of risk under incomplete information, Comp. Opns. Res. 7 (1980) 125-143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.J. Freund, The introduction of risk into a programming model, Econometrica 32 (1956) 112-136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Y. Haimes, Risk Modeling Assessment and Management (Wiley, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.B.R. Hazell, A linear alternative to quadratic and semivariance programming for farm planning under uncertainty, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 53 (1971) 53-62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.M. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Finance 7 (1952) 77-91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Morón, C. Romero and F.R. Ruiz del Portal, Generating well-behaved utility functions for compromise programming, J. Opt. Theory and Applications 91 (1996) 643-649.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Romero and T. Rehman, Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.E. Steuer, Random problem generation and the computation of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming, Comput. Opt. Applic. 3 (1994) 333-347.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.L. Yu, A class of solutions for group decision problems, Mgmt. Sci. 19 (1973) 936-946.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.L. Yu, Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. Concepts, Techniques and Extensions (Plenum Press, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Zeleny, A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal, Comp. Opns. Res. 1 (1974) 479-496.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romero, C. Risk programming for agricultural resource allocation: A multidimensional risk approach. Annals of Operations Research 94, 57–68 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018985620677

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018985620677

Navigation