Abstract
Within the framework of some simple models, we explain how option theory can enhancethe understanding and teaching of modeling under uncertainty. We discuss some commonpitfalls in modeling and argue that these result from a failure to come to grips with optionsand flexibility. We examine a dynamic programming approach to evaluating options and avaluation by arbitrage approach and end by comparing the two approaches with respect tohow they treat time and risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.J. Brennan and E.S. Schwartz, A new approach to evaluating natural resource investments, Midland Corporate Finance Journal (Spring 1985)37 – 47.
A.K. Dixit and R.S. Pindyck, Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994.
S. Ekern, An option pricing approach to evaluating petroleum projects, Energy Economics 10(1988)91 – 99.
C. Huang and R.H. Litzenberger, Foundations for Financial Economics, Elsevier Science, New York, 1990.
P. Kall and S.W. Wallace, Stochastic Programming, Wiley, Chichester, 1994.
A. Prékopa, Stochastic Programming, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995.
P. Ritchken and G. Rabinowitz, Capital budgeting using contingent claims analysis: A tutorial, in: Advances in Futures and Options Research, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1988, pp. 119 – 143.
H. Varian, The arbitrage principle in financial economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (1987)55 – 72.
H. Varian, Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd ed., Norton, New York, 1992.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christiansen, D.S., Wallace, S.W. Option theory and modeling under uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research 82, 59–82 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018991509947
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018991509947