Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric Earliness and Tardiness Scheduling with Exponential Processing Times on an Unreliable Machine

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address the problem of processing a set of jobs on a single machine under random due dates with a common distribution. The processing times of the jobs are exponentially distributed random variables with means μ i , and the machine is subject to stochastic breakdowns governed by a Poisson process. Each job i is associated with a job-dependent weight w i . The objective is to schedule the jobs so as to minimize the expected sum of the weighted earliness and tardiness costs of all jobs, which are quadratic functions of the deviations of job completion times from the due dates. We show that the problem is NP-complete. Nevertheless, important optimality properties exist, which can be utilized to develop effective algorithms to solve the problem. Specifically, we prove that, in the case where the weights assigned to both the earliness and tardiness are symmetric, an optimal sequence for the problem must be V-shaped with respect to {μ i /w i }, in the sense that the sequence will first process jobs in a nonincreasing order of {μ i /w i } and then in a nondecreasing order of {μ i /w i }. In the case where asymmetric weights are assigned to the earliness and tardiness costs, the optimal sequence must also be V-shaped with respect to {μ i /w i }, if the due dates are exponentially distributed. Dynamic programming algorithms are proposed which can find the best V-shaped sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.M. Al-Turck, J. Mittenthal and M. Raghavachari, The single-machine absolute-deviation earlytardy problem with random completion times, Naval Research Logistics 43 (1996) 573–587.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Azizoglu and S. Webster, Scheduling about an unrestricted common due window with arbitrary earliness/tardiness penalty rates, IIE Transactions 29 (1997) 1001–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Azizoglu and S. Webster, Scheduling job families about an unrestricted common due date on a single machine, International Journal of Production Research 35 (1997) 1321–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.R. Baker and G.D. Scudder, Sequencing with earliness and tardiness penalties: a review, Operations Research 38 (1990) 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Birge, J.B.G. Frenk, J. Mittenthal and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, Single-machine scheduling subject to stochastic breakdowns, Naval Research Logistics 37 (1990) 661–677.

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Cai and S. Zhou, Stochastic scheduling on parallel machines subject to random breakdowns to minimize expected costs for earliness and tardy jobs, Operations Research 47 (1999) 422–437.

    Google Scholar 

  7. X. Cai and S. Zhou, Scheduling stochastic jobs with asymmetric earliness and tardiness penalties, Naval Research Logistics 44 (1997) 531–557.

    Google Scholar 

  8. X. Cai and S. Zhou, Sequencing jobs with random processing times to minimize weighted completion time variance, Annals of Operations Research, 70 (1997) 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  9. X. Cai and F.S. Tu, Scheduling jobs with random processing times on a single machine subject to stochastic breakdowns to minimize early-tardy penalties, Naval Research Logistics 43 (1996) 1127–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. Cai, Minimization of agreeably weighted variance in single machine systems, European Journal of Operational Research 85 (1995) 576–592.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Chakravarthy, A Single machine scheduling problem with random processing times, Naval Research Logistics 33 (1986) 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Chen, C.N. Potts and G.J. Woeginger, A review of machine scheduling: complexity, algorithms, and approximability, in: Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, eds. D.-Z. Du and P. Pardalos (Kluwer Academic, 1998).

  13. T.C.E. Cheng, Optimal assignment of slack due-dates and sequencing of jobs with random processing times on a single machine, European Journal of Operational Research 51 (1991) 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.C.E. Cheng and M. Gupta, Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions, European Journal of Operational Research 38 (1989) 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Dileepan, Common due date scheduling problem with separate earliness and tardiness penalties, Computers and Operations Research 20 (1991) 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C.-Y. Lee, Danusaputro and Lin, Minimizing weighted number of tardy jobs and weighted earlinesstardiness penalties about a common due date, Computers and Operations Research 18 (1991) 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Mittenthal and M. Raghavachari, Stochastic single machine scheduling with quadratic early-tardy penalties, Operations Research 41 (1993) 786–796.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Pinedo, Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Ross, Introduction to Stochastic Dynamic Programming (Academic Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Vani and M. Raghavachari, Deterministic and random single machine sequencing with variance minimization, Operations Research 35 (1987) 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Weiss and M. Pinedo, Scheduling tasks with exponential service times on nonidentical processors to minimize makespan or flow time, Journal of Applied Probability 17 (1980) 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, X., Zhou, X. Asymmetric Earliness and Tardiness Scheduling with Exponential Processing Times on an Unreliable Machine. Annals of Operations Research 98, 313–331 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019220826984

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019220826984

Navigation