Skip to main content
Log in

Computational Discretization Algorithms for Functional Inequality Constrained Optimization

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a functional inequality constrained optimization problem is studied using a discretization method and an adaptive scheme. The problem is discretized by partitioning the interval of the independent parameter. Two methods are investigated as to how to treat the discretized optimization problem. The discretization problem is firstly converted into an optimization problem with a single nonsmooth equality constraint. Since the obtained equality constraint is nonsmooth and does not satisfy the usual constraint qualification condition, relaxation and smoothing techniques are used to approximate the equality constraint via a smooth inequality constraint. This leads to a sequence of approximate smooth optimization problems with one constraint. An adaptive scheme is incorporated into the method to facilitate the computation of the sum in the inequality constraint. The second method is to apply an adaptive scheme directly to the discretization problem. Thus a sequence of optimization problems with a small number of inequality constraints are obtained. Convergence analysis for both methods is established. Numerical examples show that each of the two proposed methods has its own advantages and disadvantages over the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.K. Brayton, G.D. Hachtel and A.L. Sangiovanni-Vincentlli, A survey of optimization techniques for integrated circuit design, Proc. IEEE 69 (1981) 1334–1362.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I.D. Coope and G.A. Watson, A projected Lagrangian algorithm for semi-infinite programming, Math. Prog. 32 (1985) 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I.D. Coope and C.J. Price, Exact penalty function methods for nonlinear semi-infinite programming, in: Semi-Infinite Programming, eds. R. Reemtsen and J.-J. Rückmann (Kluwer, 1998).

  4. G. Gonzaga, E. Polak and R. Trahan, An improved algorithm for optimization problems with functional inequality constraints, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-25 (1980) 49–54.

  5. A. Grace, Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLAB User Guide(The Maths Works, South Natick, MA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.D. Grigoreff and R.M. Reemtsen, Discrete approximation of minimization problems. I. Theory, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optimiz. 11 (1990) 701–719.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Hettich, An implementation of a discretization methods for semi-infinite programming, Math. Prog. 34 (1986) 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hettich and G. Gramlich, A note on an implementation of a method for quadratic semi-infinite programming, Math. Prog. 46 (1990) 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hettich and K.O. Kortanek, Semi-infinite programming: theory, methods, and applications, SIAM Review 35 (1993) 380–429.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Kaplan and R. Tichatschke, Stable Methods for Ill-Posed Variational Problems(Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.S. Jennings and K.L. Teo, A computational algorithm for functional inequality constrained optimization problems, Automatica 26 (1990) 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.R. Panier and A.L. Tits, A globally convergent algorithm with adaptively refined discretization for semi-infinite optimization problems arising in engineering design, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 34 (1989) 903–908.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Polak and D.Q. Mayne, An algorithm for optimization problems with functional inequality constraints, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-21 (1976) 184–193.

  14. E. Polak, D.Q. Mayne and D.M. Stimler, Control system design via semi-infinite optimization: a review, Proc. IEEE 72 (1984) 1777–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Polak and Y. Wardi, Nondifferentiable optimization algorithm for designing control systems having singular value inequalities, Automatica 18 (1982) 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Reemtsen, Some outer approximation methods for semi-infinite optimization problems, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 53 (1994) 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Reemtsen, Semi-infinite programming: discretization methods, in: Encyclopedia of Optimization, eds. C.A. Floudas and P.M. Pardalos (Kluwer, Boston, 1998) pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Reemtsen and J.J. Rückmann, eds., Semi-Infinite Programming(Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Stoer and C.H. Witzgall, Convexity and Optimization in Finite Dimension I(Springer, Berlin, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Tanaka, M. Fukushima and T. Ibaraki, A comparative study of several semi-infinite nonlinear programming algorithms, European Journal of Operational Research 36 (1988) 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.L. Teo and C.J. Goh, A simple computational procedure for optimization problems with functional inequality constraints, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AD-32 (1987) 940–941.

  22. K.L. Teo, V. Rehbock and L.S. Jennings, A new computational algorithm for functional inequality constrained optimization problems, Automatica 29 (1993) 789–792.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teo, K., Yang, X. & Jennings, L. Computational Discretization Algorithms for Functional Inequality Constrained Optimization. Annals of Operations Research 98, 215–234 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019260508329

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019260508329

Navigation