Skip to main content
Log in

A Distance Measure Tailored to Tailbiting Codes

  • Published:
Problems of Information Transmission Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The error-correcting capability of tailbiting codes generated by convolutional encoders is described. In order to obtain a description beyond what the minimum distance d min of the tailbiting code implies, the active tailbiting segment distance is introduced. The description of correctable error patterns via active distances leads to an upper bound on the decoding block error probability of tailbiting codes. The necessary length of a tailbiting code so that its minimum distance is equal to the free distance d free of the convolutional code encoded by the same encoder is easily obtained from the active tailbiting segment distance. This is useful when designing and analyzing concatenated convolutional codes with component codes that are terminated using the tailbiting method. Lower bounds on the active tailbiting segment distance and an upper bound on the ratio between the tailbiting length and memory of the convolutional generator matrix such that d min equals d free are derived. Furthermore, affine lower bounds on the active tailbiting segment distance suggest that good tailbiting codes are generated by convolutional encoders with large active-distance slopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Solomon, G. and van Tilborg, H.C.A., A Connection Between Block and Convolutional Codes, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 1979, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 358-369.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ma, J.H. and Wolf, J.K., On Tail-Biting Convolutional Codes, IEEE Trans. Commun., 1986, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 104-111.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bocharova, I.E., Johannesson, R., Kudryashov, B.D., and Stähl, P., Tailbiting Codes: Bounds and Search Results, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2002, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 137-148.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stähl, P., Anderson, J.B., and Johannesson, R., Optimal and Near-Optimal Encoders for Short and Moderate-Length Tailbiting Trellises, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1999, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2562-2572.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Höst, S., Johannesson, R., Zigangirov, K.Sh., and Zyablov, V.V., Active Distances for Convolutional Codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1999, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 658-669.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thommesen, C. and Justesen, J., Bounds on Distances and Error Exponents of Unit Memory Codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1983, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 637-648.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Justesen, J., Thommesen, C., and Zyablov, V.V., Concatenated Codes with Convolutional Inner Code, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1988, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1217-1225.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johannesson, R. and Zigangirov, K.Sh., Fundamentals of Convolutional Coding, Piscataway: IEEE Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Handlery, M., Johannesson, R., and Zyablov, V.V., Encoder and Distance Properties of Woven Convolutional Codes with One Tailbiting Component Code, Probl. Peredachi Inf., 2002, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 48-58 [Probl. Inf. Trans. (Engl. Transl.), 2002, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 41-49].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bocharova, I.E., Handlery, M., Johannesson, R., and Kudryashov, B.D., Tailbiting Codes Obtained via Convolutional Codes with Large Active Distance-Slopes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2002, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 2577-2587.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huth, G.K. and Weber, C.L., Minimum Weight Convolutional Codewords of Finite Length, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1976, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 243-246.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Traiger, I.L. and Gill, A., On an Asymptotic Optimization Problem in Finite Directed Weighted Graphs, Inf. Control, 1968, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 527-533.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calderbank, A.R., Forney, G.D., Jr., and Vardy, A., Minimal Tail-Biting Trellises: The Golay Code and More, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1999, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1435-1455.

    Google Scholar 

  14. van De Meeberg, L., A Tightened Upper Bound on the Error Probability of Binary Convolutional Codes with Viterbi Decoding, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2002, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 389-391.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolf, J.K. and Viterbi, A.J., On the Weight Distribution of Linear Block Codes Formed from Convolutional Codes, IEEE Trans. Commun., 1996, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1049-1051.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Höst, S., Johannesson, R., and Zyablov, V.V., Woven Convolutional Codes I: Encoder Properties, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2002, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 149-161.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, J.B., Best Short Rate 1/2 Tailbiting Codes for the Bit Error Rate Criterion, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2000, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 597-610.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Costello, D.J., Free Distance Bounds for Convolutional Codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1974, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 356-365.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kudryashov, B.D. and Zakharova, T.G., Block Codes from Convolutional Codes, Probl. Peredachi Inf., 1989, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 98-102 [Probl. Inf. Trans. (Engl. Transl.), 1989, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 336-339].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Handlery, M., Höst, S., Johannesson, R. et al. A Distance Measure Tailored to Tailbiting Codes. Problems of Information Transmission 38, 280–295 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022097828917

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022097828917

Keywords

Navigation