Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual Issues in Music Pattern Recognition: Complexity of Rhythm and Key Finding

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider several perceptual issues in the context of machine recognition ofmusic patterns. It is argued that a successful implementation of a musicrecognition system must incorporate perceptual information and error criteria.We discuss several measures of rhythm complexity which are used fordetermining relative weights of pitch and rhythm errors. Then, a new methodfor determining a localized tonal context is proposed. This method is based onempirically derived key distances. The generated key assignments are then usedto construct the perceptual pitch error criterion which is based on noterelatedness ratings obtained from experiments with human listeners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartz, A.E. “Some Thoughts on Measurement”. In Basic Statistical Concepts, 3rd edn. New York, NY: MacMillan, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N. “Reconciling Simplicity and Likelihood Principles in Perceptual Organization”. Psychological Review, 103 (1996), 566–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, E.J. and I. Shmulevich. “A System for Machine Recognition of Music Patterns”. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Seattle,WA, 1998.

  • Essens, P. “Structuring Temporal Sequences: Comparison of Models and Factors of Complexity”. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(4) (1995), 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, E.N. “Lattice Theoretic Properties of Frontal Switching Functions”. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 33(1) (1954), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse, S.H., A.H. Takeuchi and R.F. Braaten. “Perceptual Invariances in the Comparative Psychology of Music”. Music Perception, 10(2) (1992), 151–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C.L. and R.N. Shepard. “Quantification of the Hierarchy of Tonal Functions Within a Diatonic Context”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5 (1979), 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C.L. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, E.L. “A Perceptual Coding Language for Visual and Auditory Patterns”. American Journal of Psychology, 84(3) (1971), 307–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempel, A. and J. Ziv. “On the Complexity of Finite Sequences”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-22(1) (1976), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont-Reynaud, B. and M. Goldstein. “On Finding Rhythmic Patterns in Musical Lines”. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco, CA, 1985.

  • Nodes, T.A. and N. Gallagher. “Median Filters: Some Modifications and Their Properties”. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 31 (1983), 739–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povel, D.J. “A Theoretical Framework for Rhythm Perception”. Psychological Research, 45(4) (1984), 315–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povel, D.J. and P.J. Essens. “Perception of Temporal Patterns”. Music Perception, 2 (1985), 411–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmulevich, I. and E.J. Coyle. “Establishing the Tonal Context for Musical Pattern Recognition”. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. New Paltz, N.Y., 1997a.

  • Shmulevich, I. and E.J. Coyle. “The Use of Recursive Median Filters for Establishing the Tonal Context in Music”. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing. Mackinac Island, MI, 1997b.

  • Shmulevich, I. and O. Yli-Harja. “Localized Key-Finding: Algorithms and Applications”. (to appear in) Music Perception.

  • Shmulevich, I. and D. Povel. “Rhythm Complexity Measures for Music Pattern Recognition”. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. Redondo Beach, California, December 7–9, 1998.

  • Shmulevich, I. and D.J. Povel. “Measures of Temporal Pattern Complexity”. (to appear in) Journal of New Music Research.

  • Takeuchi, A.H. “Maximum Key-Profile Correlation (MKC) as a Measure of Tonal Structure in Music”. Perception and Psychophysics, 56 (1994), 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanguiane, A. “A Principle of Correlativity of Perception and Its Application to Music Recognition”. Music Perception, 11(4) (1994), 465–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Harja, O., I. Shmulevich and K. Lemström. “Graph-Based Smoothing of Class Data with Applications in Musical Key Finding”. Proceedings of IEEE-EURASIPWorkshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing. Antalya, Turkey, 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shmulevich, I., Yli-Harja, O., Coyle, E. et al. Perceptual Issues in Music Pattern Recognition: Complexity of Rhythm and Key Finding. Computers and the Humanities 35, 23–35 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002629217152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002629217152

Keywords

Navigation