Skip to main content
Log in

Grades of Explanation in Cognitive Science

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I sketch an explanatory framework that fits a variety of contemporary research programs in cognitive science. I then investigate the scope and the implications of this framework. The framework emphasizes (a) the explanatory role played by the semantic content of cognitive representations, and (b) the important “mechanistic”, non-intentional dimension of cognitive explanations. I show how both of these features are present simultaneously in certain varieties of cognitive explanation. I also consider the explanatory role played by grounded representational content, that is, content evaluated by appeal to its truth, falsity, accuracy, inaccuracy and other relational properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Individualism and the Mental’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, 73–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1986, ‘Individualism and Psychology’, Philosophical Review 95, 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherniak, C.: 1981, ‘Minimal Rationality’, Mind 90, 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S.: 1986, Neurophilosophy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1983, Psychological Explanation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘Mental Events’, in J. W. Swanson (eds.), Experience and Theory, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1971, ‘Intentional Systems’, Journal of Philosophy 68, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F.: 1974, ‘An Alleged Defect in Gettier Counterexamples’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52, 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., T. B. Ward, and S. M. Smith: 1992, Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1974, ‘Special Sciences’, Synthese 28, 77–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1980, ‘Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1987, Psychosemantics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1990, ‘Making Mind Matter More’, in A Theory of Content and Other Essays, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C.: 1973, ‘Ideology as a Cultural System’, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E.: 1963, ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23, 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J.: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, V.: 1992, ‘Reduction, Explanatory Extension, and the Mind/Brain Sciences’, Philosophy of Science 59, 408–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1981, ‘Semantic Engines: An Introduction to Mind Design’, in J. Haugeland (ed.), Mind Design, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1985, Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, J. and A. Mele (eds.): 1993, Mental Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: 1990, Truth, Basil Blackwell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1988, The Scientific Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1988, ‘Marr's Computational Theory of Vision’, Philosophy of Science 55, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: 1982, Vision, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, R.: 1989, ‘Does Epistemology Reduce to Cognitive Psychology?’, Philosophia 19, 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, R.: 1995a, ‘Non-Cartesian Explanations Meet the Problem of Mental Causation’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 33, 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, R.: 1995b, ‘Explanation and Evaluation in Cognitive Science’, Philosophy of Science 62, 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1993, The Nature of Rationality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N.: 1984, The Mind's Best Work, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7, 131–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1978, ‘Reference and Understanding’, in Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1994, ‘Causality Without Counterfactuals’, Philosophy of Science 61, 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G. and E. Sober: 1991, ‘The Causal Efficacy of Content’, Philosophical Studies 63, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T. J. and C. R. Rosenberg: 1988, ‘Learning and Representation in Connectionist Models’, in M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), Perspectives in Memory Research, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P.: 1991, ‘Connectionism, Constituency and the Language of Thought’, in B. Loewer and G. Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1974, ‘Judgement Under Uncertainty; Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185, 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, P.: 1968, ‘An Analysis of Factual Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T.: 1972, Understanding Natural Language, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montgomery, R. Grades of Explanation in Cognitive Science. Synthese 114, 463–495 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005084615487

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005084615487

Keywords

Navigation