Skip to main content
Log in

Risk's Place in Decision Rules

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To handle epistemic and pragmatic risks, Gärdenfors and Sahlin (1982, 1988) design a decision procedure for cases in which probabilities are indeterminate. Their procedure steps outside the traditional expected utility framework. Must it do this? Can the traditional framework handle risk? This paper argues that it can. The key is a comprehensive interpretation of an option's possible outcomes. Taking possible outcomes more broadly than Gärdenfors and Sahlin do, expected utility can give risk its due. In particular, Good's (1952) decision procedure adequately handles indeterminate probabilities and the risks they generate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beebee, H. and D. Papineau: 1997, ‘Probability as a Guide to Life’, Journal of Philosophy 94, 217-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1979, ‘Forecasts, Decisions, and Uncertain Probabilities’, Erkenntnis 14, 159-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. and N. Sahlin: 1982, ‘Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking, and Decision Making’, Synthese 53, 361-386. Reprinted in P. Gärdenfors and N. Sahlin (eds), Decision, Probability, and Utility: Selected Readings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, pp. 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: 1952, ‘Rational Decisions’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 14, 107-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R.: 1992, Probability and the Art of Judgment, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica 47, 263-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusser, A. and W. Spohn: 1992, ‘The Utility of Pleasure is a Pain for Decision Theory’, Journal of Philosophy 89, 10-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, P.: 1986, ‘Expected Utility and Risk’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37, 419-442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weirich, P. Risk's Place in Decision Rules. Synthese 126, 427–441 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005240226961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005240226961

Keywords

Navigation