Abstract
This paper is the final part of the syntactic demonstration of the Arithmetical Completeness of the modal system G; in the preceding parts [9] and [10] the tools for the proof were defined, in particular the notion of syntactic countermodel. Our strategy is: PA-completeness of G as a search for interpretations which force the distance between G and a GL-LIN-theorem to zero. If the GL-LIN-theorem S is not a G-theorem, we construct a formula H expressing the non G-provability of S, so that ⊢GL-LIN ∼ H and so that a canonical proof T of ∼ H in GL-LIN is a syntactic countermodel for S with respect to G, which has the height θ(T) equal to the distance d(S, G) of S from G. Then we define the interpretation ξ of S which represents the proof-tree T in PA. By induction on θ(T), we prove that ⊢PA Sξ and d(S, G) > 0 imply the inconsistency of PA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernardi, C., F. Montagna, ‘Equivalence relations induced by extensional formulae: classification by means of a new fixed point property’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 124 (1984), 221–233.
Boolos, G., The Unprovability of Consistency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.
Borga, M., ‘On some proof theoretical properties of the modal logic GL’, Studia Logica 42 (1983), 453–459.
De Jongh, D. H. J., F. Montagna, ‘Generic Generalized Rosser Fixed Points’, Studia Logica 46 (1987), 193–203.
Gentilini, P., ‘Provability Logic in the Gentzen formulation of arithmetic’, Zeitsch. F. Math. Logik und Grundlagen der Math. 38 (1992), 535–550.
Gentilini, P., ‘Syntactical results on the arithmetical completeness of modal logic’, Studia Logica 52,4 (1993), 549–564.
Gentilini, P., PA-Completeness of Modal Logic: Constructive Reduction of PA-Proofs to GL-LIN-Proofs, pubblicazioni dell' Istituto per la Matematica Applicata del CNR, n. 2, January 1997.
Gentilini, P., Teoremi di completezza aritmetica della logica modale: una trattazione sintattica, Genova 1990: Doctoral Thesis for Doctorate in Mathematical Research, discussed and approved by the national board of italian Ministry of Research.
Gentilini, P., ‘Proof-theoretic modal PA-completeness I: a system-sequent metric’, Studia Logica 63 (1999), 27–48.
Gentilini, P.: ‘Proof-theoretic modal PA-completeness II: the syntactic countermodel’, Studia Logica 63 (1999), 245–268.
Gentilini, P., ‘Informational proof-theory’, contribution to International Conference on Logic methodology and Philosophy of Science (LMPS 1995), Florence 1995.
Gentzen, G., Collected Papers, Szabo (ed.), North Holland, 1969.
Girard, J. Y., Proof Theory and Logical Complexity, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1987.
Sambin, G., S. Valentini, ‘A modal sequent calculus for a fragment of arithmetic’, Studia Logica 39 (1980), 245–256.
Sambin, G., S. Valentini, ‘The modal logic of the provability. The sequential approach’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982), 311–342.
SmoryŃski, C., Selfreference and Modal Logic, Springer Verlag, New York, 1985.
Solovay, R., ‘Provability interpretations of modal logic’, Israel Jour. of Math. 25 (1976), 287–304.
Takeuti, G., Proof Theory, North-Holland, 1987 (second editio).
Valentini, S., U Solitro, ‘The modal logic of consistency assertions of Peano Arithmetic’. Zeitsch. F. Math. Logik und Grundlagen der Math. 29 (1983), 25–32.
Valentini, S., ‘A syntactic proof of cut-elimination for GL-LIN’, Zeitsch. F. Math. Logik und Grundlagen der Math. 32 (1986), 137–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gentilini, P. Proof-Theoretic Modal PA-Completeness III: The Syntactic Proof. Studia Logica 63, 301–310 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005262101188
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005262101188