Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Implementation of a Variable D-H Parameter Model for Robot Calibration Using an FCMAC Learning Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current robot calibration schemes usually employ calibration models with constant error parameters. Consequently,they are inevitably subject to a certain degree of locality, i.e., the calibrated error parameters (CEPs) will produce the desiredaccuracy only in certain regions of the robot workspace. To deal with the locality phenomenon, CEPs that vary in differentregions of the robot workspace may be more appropriate. Hence, we propose a variable D-H (Denavit and Hartenberg)parameter model to formulate variations of CEPs. An FCMAC (Fuzzy Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller) learningalgorithm is used to implement the proposed variable D-H parameter model. Simulations and experiments that verify theeffectiveness of the proposed calibration scheme based on the variable D-H parameter model are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Ahmad, S.: Analysis of robot drive train errors, their static effects, and their compensation, IEEE J. Robotics and Automation 4(2) (1988), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albus, J. S.: A new approach to manipulator control: The Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC), ASME J. Dynamic Systems Meas. Control 97(3) (1975), 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albus, J. S.: Data storage in the Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC), ASME J. Dynamic Systems Meas. Control 97(3) (1975), 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azadivar, F.: The effect of joint position errors of industrial robots on their performance in manufacturing operations, IEEE J. Robotics Automat. 3(2) (1987), 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bay, J. S.: Autonomous parameter identification by optimal learning control, IEEE Control Systems Magazine 13(3) (1993), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borm, J. H. and Menq, C. H.: Determination of optimal measurement configurations for robot calibration based on observability measure, Int. J. Robotics Research 10(1) (1991), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, J. and Chao, L. M.: Positioning error analysis for robot manipulators with all rotary joints, IEEE J. Robotics Automat. 3(6) (1987), 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denavit, J. and Hartenberg, R. S.: A kinematic notation for low-pair mechanisms based on matrices, ASME J. Appl. Mechanics 77 (1955), 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Driels, M. R. and Pathre, U. S.: Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments, J. Robotic Systems 7(2) (1990), 197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Driels, M. R. and Swayze, W. E.: Automated partial pose measurement system for manipulator calibration experiments, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 10(4) (1994), 430–440.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Everett, L. J., Driels, M. R., and Mooring, B. M.: Kinematic modeling for robot calibration, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 183–189.

  12. Goswami, A., Quaid, A., and Peshkin, M.: Complete parameter identification of a robot from partial pose information, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1993, pp. 168–173.

  13. Gupta, K. C. and Kazerounian, K.: Improved numerical solutions of inverse kinematics of robots, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1985, pp. 743–748.

  14. Hayati, S. A.: Robot arm geometric link parameter estimation, in: 22nd IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 1983, pp. 1477–1483.

  15. Hayati, S. A. and Roston, G. P.: Inverse kinematic solution for near-simple robots and its application to robot calibration, in: M. Jamshidi et al. (eds), Recent Trends in Robotics: Modeling, Control and Education, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hollerbach, J. M. and Bennett, D. J.: Autonomous calibration of single-loop closed kinematic chains formed by manipulators with passive endpoint constraints, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 7(5) (1991), 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jou, C. C.: A fuzzy cerebellar model articulation controller, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, 1982, pp. 1171–1178.

  18. Judd, R. P. and Knasinski, A. B.: A technique to calibrate industrial robots with experimental verification, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 6(1) (1990), 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khalil, W., Gautier, M., and Enguehard, Ch.: Identifiable parameters and optimum configurations for robot calibration, Robotica 9 (1991), 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirchner, H. O., Gurumoorthy, B., and Prinz, F. B.: A perturbation approach to robot calibration, Int. J. Robotics Research 6(4) (1987), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Latombe, J.-C.: Robot Motion Planning, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, C. C.: Fuzzy logic in control systems: Fuzzy logic controller – Parts I and II, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 20(2) (1990), 404–435.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, W. T., Glanz, F. H., and Kraft, L. G.: Application of a general learning algorithm to the control of robotic manipulators, Int. J. Robotics Research 6(2) (1987), 84–98.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mooring, B.W. and Pack, T. J.: Determination and specification of robot repeatability, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1986, pp. 1017–1023.

  25. Nie, J. and Linkens, D. A.: A fuzzified CMAC self-learning controller, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, 1993, pp. 500–505.

  26. Orin, D. E. and Tsai, Y. T.: A real-time computer architecture for inverse kinematics, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1986, pp. 843–850.

  27. Renders, J.-M., Rossignol, E., Becquet, M., and Hanus, R.: Kinematic calibration and geometrical parameter identification for robots, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 7(6) (1991), 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rene Mayer, J. R. and Parker, G. A.: A portable instrument for 3-D dynamic robot measurements using triangulation and laser tracking, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 10(4) (1994), 504–516.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roth, Z. S., Mooring, B.W., and Ravani, B.: An overview of robot calibration, IEEE J. Robotics Automat. 3(5) (1987), 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shamma, J. S. and Whitney, D. E.: A method for inverse robot calibration, ASME J. Dynamic Systems Meas. Control 109 (1987), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stone, H. W. and Sanderson, A. C.: A prototype arm signature identification system, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 175–182.

  32. Vaishnav, R. N. and Magrab, E. B.: A general procedure to evaluate robot positioning errors, Int. J. Robotics Research 6(1) (1987), 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Veitschegger, W. K. and Wu, C. H.: Robot calibration and compensation, IEEE J. Robotics Automat. 4(6) (1988), 643–656.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Whitney, D. E., Lozinski, C. A., and Rourke, J.M.: Industrial robot forward calibration method and results, ASME J. Dynamic Systems Meas. Control 108 (1986), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, C. H.: A kinematic CAD tool for the design and control of a robot manipulator, Int. J. Robotics Research 3(1) (1984), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wu, C. H., Ho, J., and Young, K. Y.: Design of robot accuracy compensator after calibration, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1988, pp. 780–785.

  37. Zhuang, H., Roth, Z. S, and Hamano, F.: A complete and parametrically continuous kinematic model for robot manipulators, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 8(4) (1992), 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Control Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

    Kuu-young Young & Jin-Jou Chen

Authors
  1. Kuu-young Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin-Jou Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, Ky., Chen, JJ. Implementation of a Variable D-H Parameter Model for Robot Calibration Using an FCMAC Learning Algorithm. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 24, 313–346 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008094014724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008094014724