Abstract
An important issue concerning the design of any vision system is the choice of a proper space representation. In order to search for clues to a suitable representation, we look at the distortion of space arising from errors in motion or stereo estimates. Understanding this space distortion has important epistemological implications for the problem of space representation because it tells us what can be and what cannot be computed. This paper is therefore an enquiry into the nature of space representation through the study of the space distortion, though it is not a psychophysical or physiological study but rather a computational one. We show that the distortion transformation is a quadratic Cremona transformation, which is bijective almost everywhere except on the set of fundamental elements. We identify the fundamental elements of both the direct and the inverse transformations, and study the behaviour of the space distortion by analyzing the transformation of space elements (lines, planes) that pass through these fundamental elements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Adiv, G. 1989. Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3D motion and structure from a noisy flow field. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 11:477–489.
Aloimonos, J., Weiss, I., and Bandopadhay, A. 1988. Active vision. Int'l. J. of Computer Vision, 2:333–356.
Baratoff, G. 1997. Distortion of stereoscopic visual space. Doctoral Dissertation, Center for Automation Research, University of Maryland, Technical Report CAR-TR-861.
Barron, J.L., Jepson, A.D., and Tsotsos, J.K. 1987. The sensitivity of motion and structure computations. In Proc. 6th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, Washington, pp. 700–705.
Black, M. 1994. Recursive non-linear estimation of discontinuous flow fields. In Proc. 3rd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 138–145.
Bober, M. and Kittler, J. 1994. Robust motion analysis. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, Washington, pp. 947–952.
Cheong, L.F., Fermüller, C., and Aloimonos, Y. 1998. Interaction between 3D shape and motion: Theory and applications. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 71(3):356–372.
Cox, D., Little, J., and O'shea, D. 1992. Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra. Springer-Verlag: New York.
Daniilidis, K. and Nagel, H.-H. 1993. The coupling of rotation and translation in motion estimation of planar surfaces. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New York City, New York, pp. 188–193.
Daniilidis, K. and Spetsakis, M.E. 1997. Understanding noise sensitivity in structure from motion. In Visual Navigation: From Biological Systems to Unmanned Ground Vehicles, Y. Aloimonos (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey.
Duric, Z. and Aloimonos, Y. 1994. Estimating the heading direction using normal flow. Int'l Journal of Computer Vision, 13(1): 1–56.
Dutta, R. and Snyder, M.A. 1990. Robustness of correspondencebased structure from motion. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Osaka, Japan, pp. 106–110.
Fermüller, C. 1995. Passive navigation as a pattern recognition problem. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 14:147–158.
Fermüller, C., Cheong, L.F., and Aloimonos, Y. 1997. Visual space distortion. Biological Cybernetics, 77:323–337.
Fleet, D. 1992. Measurement of Image Velocity. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell.
Foley, J.M. 1967. Effects of voluntary eye movement and convergence on the binocular appreciation of depth. Perception and Psychophysics, 11:423–427.
Foley, J.M. 1980. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87(5):411–434.
Garding, J., Porrill, J., Mayhew, J.E.W., and Frisby, J.P. 1995. Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Research, 35:703–722.
Heeger, D. and Jepson, A. 1992. Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion I: Algorithm and implementation. Int'l J. of Computer Vision, 7:95–117.
Heel, J. 1990. Direct estimation of structure and motion from multiple frames. M.I.T. Artif. Intell. Lab., M.I.T., AI Memo. 1190.
Horn, B.K.P. 1987. Motion fields are hardly ever ambiguous. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 1:259–274.
Hudson, H.P. 1927. Cremona Transformations in Plane and Space. The University Press: Cambridge. Also as 2nd edition, 1996.
Johnston, E.B. 1991. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research, 31:1351–1360.
Krames, J. 1940. DeZur Ermittlung eines Objektes aus zwei perspektiven—Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der “gefährlichen örter”. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 49:327–354.
Longuet-Higgins, H.C. 1981. A computer algorithm for reconstruction of a scene from two projections. Nature, 293:133–135.
Marr, D. 1982. Vision. Freeman: San Franscico.
Maybank, S. 1993. Theory of Reconstruction from Image Motion. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
Negahdaripour, S. 1987. Ambiguities of a motion field. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Computer Vision, London, England, pp. 607–611.
Negahdaripour, S. 1989. Critical surface pairs and triplets. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 13:293–312.
Ogle, K.N. 1964. Researches in BinocularVision. Hafner: NewYork.
Schunck, B.G. 1989. Image flow segmentation and estimation by constraint line clustering. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 11:1010–1027.
Semple, J. and Roth, L. 1949. Introduction to Algebraic Geometry. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Shafarevich, I.R. 1994. Basic Algebraic Geometry I. Springer-Verlag: New York.
Sinclair, D., Blake, A., and Murray, D. 1994. Robust estimation of egomotion from normal flow. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 13:57–69.
Spetsakis, M.E. and Aloimonos, Y. 1988. Optimal computing of structure from motion using point correspondence. In Proc. Int'l. Conf. on Computer Vision, Tampa, Florida, pp. 449–453.
Thomas, J.I., Hanson, A., and Oliensis, J. 1993. Understanding noise: The critical role of motion error in scene reconstruction. In Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, Washington, DC, pp. 691–695.
Tittle, J.S., Todd, J.T., Perotti, V.J., and Norman, J.F. 1995. Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3):663–678.
Todd, J.T. and Reichel, F.D. 1989. Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. Psychological Review, 96(4):643–657.
Tsai, R.Y. and Huang, T.S. 1984. Uniqueness and estimation of threedimensional motion parameters of rigid objects with curved surfaces. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 6:13–27.
Uras, S., Girosi, F., and Torre, V. 1988. A computational approach to motion perception. Biological Cybernetics, 60:79–87.
Verri, A. and Poggio, T. 1989. Motion Field and Optical Flow: Qualitative Properties. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 11:490–498.
Vièville, T. and Faugeras, O.D. 1989. Cooperation of the inertial and visual systems. In Traditional and Non-Traditional Robotic Sensors, T. Henderson (Ed.), Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
Weng, J., Huang, T.S., and Ahuja, N. 1991. Motion and Structure from Image Sequences. Springer-Verlag: New York.
Young, G.S. and Chellapa, R. 1992. Statistical analysis of inherent ambiguities in recovering 3D motion from a noisy flowfield. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 14:995–1013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheong, LF., Ng, KO. Geometry of Distorted Visual Space and Cremona Transformation. International Journal of Computer Vision 32, 195–212 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008105012585
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008105012585