Skip to main content
Log in

Minimization of MRF Energy with Relaxation Labeling

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, there has been increasing interest in Markovrandom field (MRF) modeling for solving a variety of computer visionproblems formulated in terms of the maximum a posteriori(MAP) probability. When the label set is discrete, such as in imagesegmentation and matching, the minimization is combinatorial. Theobjective of this paper is twofold: Firstly, we propose to use thecontinuous relaxation labeling (RL) as an alternative approach forthe minimization. The motivation is that it provides a goodcompromise between the solution quality and the computational cost.We show how the original combinatorial optimization can be convertedinto a form suitable for continuous RL. Secondly, we compare variousminimization algorithms, namely, the RL algorithms proposed byRosenfeld et al., and by Hummel and Zucker, the mean field annealing ofPeterson and Soderberg, simulated annealing of Kirkpatrick, theiterative conditional modes (ICM) of Besag and an annealing versionof ICM proposed in this paper. The comparisons are in terms of theminimized energy value (i.e., the solution quality), the requirednumber of iterations (i.e., the computational cost), and also thedependence of each algorithm on heuristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.H.L. Aarts, Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines: A Stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing, Wiley, 1989.

  2. J. Besag, “On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures,” (with discussions), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 48, pp. 259–302, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Blake and A. Zisserman, Visual Reconstruction, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.I. Bozma and J.S. Duncan, “Admissibility of constraint functions in relaxation labeling,” in Proceedings of Second International Conference on Computer Vision, Florida, 1988, pp. 328–332.

  5. I.M. Elfadel, “From Random Fields to Networks,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1993.

  6. O.D. Faugeras and M. Berthod, “Improving consistency and reducing ambiguity in stochastic labeling: An optimization approach,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 3, pp. 412–423, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O.D. Faugeras and K. Price, “Semantic description of aerial images using stochastic labeling,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 3, pp. 638–642, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 6, No.6, pp. 721–741, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.M. Haralick, “Decision making in context,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,Vol. 5, No.4, pp. 417–428, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.A. Hummel and S.W. Zucker, “On the foundations of relaxation labeling process,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 5, No.3, pp. 267–286, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gellatt, and M.P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, Vol. 220, pp. 671–680, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Kittler, W.J. Christmas, and M. Petrou, “Probabilistic relaxation for matching problem in computer vision,” in Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computer Vision, Germany, 1993, pp. 666–673.

  13. S.Z. Li, “Towards 3D vision from range images: An optimization framework and parallel networks,” CVGIP: Image Understanding, Vol. 55, No.3, pp. 231–260, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.Z. Li, “Matching: Invariant to translations, rotations and scale changes,” Pattern Recognition, Vol. 25, No.6, pp. 583–594, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.Z. Li, “A Markov random field model for object matching under contextual constraints,” in Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, Washington, 1994, pp. 866–869.

  16. S.Z. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision, Springer-Verlag, 1995.

  17. S.Z. Li, “Relaxation labeling using Lagrange multipliers and Hopfield network,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 23–26.

  18. S.Z. Li, H. Wang, and M. Petrou, “Relaxation labeling of Markov random fields,” in Proceedings of International Conference Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, Israel, 1994, Vol. 1, pp. 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.L. Marroquin, “Probabilistic Solution of Inverse Problems,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT AI Lab, 1985.

  20. B.M. McMillin and L.M. Ni, “A reliable parallel algorithm for relaxation labeling,” in Parallel Processing for Computer Vision and Display, P.M. Dew, R.A. Earnshaw, and T.R. Heywood (Eds.), Addison-Wesley, pp. 190–209, 1989.

  21. N. Metropolis et al., “Equations of state calculations by fast computational machine,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 21, pp. 1087–1091, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Mohammed, R. Hummel, and S. Zucker, “A feasible direction operator for relaxation method,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 5, No.3, pp. 330–332, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.L. Mundy and A. Zisserman (Eds.), Geometric Invariants in Computer Vision, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.P. O'Leary and S. Peleg, “Analysis of relaxation processes: The two-node two label case,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-13, No.4, pp. 618–623, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Peleg, “A new probability relaxation scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 8, pp. 362–369, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Peleg and R.A. Rosenfeld, “Determining compatibility coefficients for curve enhancement relaxation processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 8, pp. 548–554, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Peterson and B. Soderberg, “A new method for mapping optimization problems onto neural networks,” International Journal of Neural Systems, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 3–22, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K.E. Price, “Relaxation matching techniques—A comparison,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 7, No.5, pp. 617–623, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S.A. Rosen, “The gradient projection method for nonlinear programming—Part I: Linear constraints,” Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 8, No.1, pp. 181–217, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Rosenfeld, R. Hummel, and S. Zucker, “Scene labeling by relaxation operations,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 6, pp. 420–433, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P.D. Simic, “Statisrical mechanics as the underlying theory of 'elastic' and 'neural' optimization,” Network,Vol. 1, pp. 89–103, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Wasserstrom, “Numerical solutions by the continuition method,” SIAM Review, Vol. 15, pp. 89–119, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A.L. Yullie, “Generalized deformable models, statistical physics and matching problems,” Neural Computation, Vol. 2, pp. 1–24, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S.Z., Wang, H., Chan, K.L. et al. Minimization of MRF Energy with Relaxation Labeling. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 7, 149–161 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008253505953

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008253505953

Navigation