Abstract
We describe the modular architecture of a generic dialogue system that assists a user/operator in performing a task with a tool. This coaching system is named CALLIOPE after the Greek goddess of eloquence. It aims at being an active partner in an intelligent man-machine dialogue. The intelligent dimension of the coaching system is reflected by its ability to adapt to the user and the situation at hand. The CALLIOPE system contains an explicit user model and world model to situate its dialogue actions. A plan library allows it to follow loosely predetermined dialogue scenarios.
The heart of the coaching system is an AI planning module, which plans a series of dialogue actions. We present a coherent set of three dialogue or speech actions that will make up the physical form of the man-machine communication.The use of the AI planning paradigm as a basis for man-machine interaction is motivated by research in various disciplines, as e.g., AI, Cognitive Science and Social Sciences. Starting from the man-man communication metaphor, we can view the “thinking before speaking” of a human communication partner as constructing an underlying plan which is responsible for the purposiveness, the organisation and the relevance of the communication.
CALLIOPE has been fully implemented and tested on theoretical examples. At present, also three tailored versions of CALLIOPE are in operational use in different industrial application domains: operator support for remedying tasks in chemical process industry, operator support for a combined task of planning, plan execution and process control in the area of chemical process development, and thirdly decision support in production scheduling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.F. Allen and C.R. Perrault, “Analysing intentions in utterances,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 15, no.3, pp. 143-178, 1980.
J.A. Ambros-Ingerson and S. Steel, “Integrated planning, execution, and monitoring,” in Proceedings of AAAI 1988, 1988, pp. 65-69.
D.E. Appelt, “Planning English referring expressions,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, pp. 1-33, 1985.
D. Chapman, “Planning for conjunctive goals,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, pp. 333-377, 1987.
P.R. Cohen and C.R. Perrault, “Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts,” Cognitive Science, vol. 3, pp. 177-212, 1979.
K. Dockx and R. Timmermans, “Adding a temporal dimension to expert systems working in a real-time environment,” Communication and Cognition-Artificial Intelligence, CCAI, vol. 9, nos.2-3, pp. 253-257, 1992.
K. Dockx and K. Meert, “Production scheduling in a chemical process environment based on a simulated annealing algorithm,” Journal A, vol. 34, pp. 41-46, 1993.
K. Dockx, K. Meert, and B. Kuijpers, “Production scheduling in a chemical environment based on simulated annealing,” in Proceedings of AAAI SIGMAN Workshop, New Orleans, 1994.
R.E. Fikes and N. Nilsson, “STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no.2, pp. 189-208, 1971.
E. Fink and Q. Yang, “Automatically abstracting effects of operators,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on AI Planning Systems, 1992, pp. 243-251.
E. Fink and Q. Yang, “Characterizing and automatically finding primary effects in planning,” IJCAI-93, pp. 1374-1379, 1993.
B.J. Grosz and C.L. Sidner, “Plans for discourse,” in Intentions in Communication, edited by P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M.E. Pollack, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 417-444, 1990.
R.W. Hill, Jr. and W.L. Johnson, “Situated plan attribution for intelligent tutoring,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-94, 1994, pp. 499-505.
E. Hollnagel and D.D. Woods, “Cognitive systems engineering: New wine in new bottles,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 18, pp. 583-600, 1983.
S. Kambhampati, “On the utility of systematicity: Understanding tradeoffs between redundancy and commitment in partial-order planning,” IJCAI-93, pp. 1380-1385, 1993.
K. Kanev and K. Dockx, “A framework for graphically-oriented human computer interactions in intelligent operator support systems,” Comput. and Graphics, vol. 18, no.4, pp. 563-570, 1994.
J.D. Moore, Participating in Explanatory Dialogues. Interpreting and Responding to Questions in Context, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1995.
D.J. Musliner, “Using abstraction and nondeterminism to plan reaction loops,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-94, 1994, pp. 1036-1041.
S.H. Nwana, “Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 4, pp. 251-277, 1990.
L. Quinn and D.M. Russel, “Intelligent interfaces: User models and planners,” in Proceedings CHI' 86, April 1986, pp. 314-320.
J. Rasmussen, “Cognitive systems analysis for risk management,” in Proceedings of SITEF 91-International Symposium on Cognitive Interactions, 1991, pp. 24-25.
E. Sacerdoti, “Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no.2, pp. 115-135, 1975.
S. Steel, “The bread and butter of planning,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 1, pp. 159-181, 1987.
L.A. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
A. Tate, J. Hendler, and M. Drummond, “A review of AI planning techniques,” in Readings in Planning, edited by J. Allen, J. Hendler, and A. Tate, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: California, pp. 26-49, 1990.
P. Van Bael, “Scheduling chemical batch processes with transfer times and sequence dependent set-up times in ZW or NIS policy,” The Second International Conference on the Practical Applications of Constraint Technology, London, UK, 1996, pp. 453-464.
R. Wilensky, D.N. Chin, M. Luria, J. Martin, J. Mayfield, and D. Wu, “The Berkeley UNIX consultant project,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 14, no.4, pp. 35-84, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuijpers, B., Dockx, K. An Intelligent Man-Machine Dialogue System Based on AI Planning. Applied Intelligence 8, 235–245 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268417191
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268417191