Skip to main content
Log in

A Non-myopic Utility Function for Statistical Global Optimization Algorithms

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high cost of providing “worst-case” solutions to global optimization problems has motivated the development of ”average-case“ algorithms that rely on a statistical model of the objective function. The critical role of the statistical model is to guide the search for the optimum. The standard approach is to define a utility function u(x) that in a certain sense reflects the benefit of evaluating the function at x. A proper utility function needs to strike a balance between the immediate benefit of evaluating the function at x – a myopic consideration; and the overall effect of this choice on the performance of the algorithm – a global criterion. The utility functions currently used in this context are heuristically modified versions of some myopic utility functions. We propose using a new utility function that is provably a globally optimal utility function in a non-adaptive context (where the model of the function values remains unchanged). In the adaptive context, this utility function is not necessarily optimal, however, given its global nature, we expect that its use will lead to the improved performance of statistical global optimization algorithms. To illustrate the approach, and to test the above assertion, we apply this utility function to an existing adaptive multi-dimensional statistical global optimization algorithm and provide experimental comparisons with the original algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aluffi-Pentini, F., Parisi, V. and Zirilli, F. (1988), A Global Optimization Algorithm Using Stochastic Differential Equations. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 14(4), 345-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betró, B. (1991), Bayesian Methods in Global Optimization, J. of Global Optimization 1(1), 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betrò, B. and Schoen, F. (1992), Optimal and Sub-optimal Stopping Rules for Multistart Algorithm in Global Optimization, Mathematical Programming 38, 271-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañon, D.A., Streltsov, S. and Vakili, P. (1998), Optimality of Index Policies for a Sequential Sampling, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

  • Kushner, H. (1964), A New Method of Locating the Maximum Point of an Arbitrary Multipeak Curve in the Presence of Noise, Transactions of the ASME, Series D, J. of Basic Engineering 86, 97-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockus, J. (1989), Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  • Mockus, J. (1994), Application of Bayesian Approach to Numerical Methods of Global and Stochastic Optimization. J. of Global Optimization 4(4), 347-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockus, J. and Mockus, L. (1991), Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization and Application to Multiobjective and Constrained Problems. J. of Optimization Theory and Applications 70(1), 157-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norkin, V., Ermoliev, Yu. and Ruszczynski, A. (1994), On Optimal Allocation of Indivisibles under Uncertainty, Working Paper WP-94-21, IIASA.

  • Pintér, J. (1996), Global Optimization in Action. Continuous and Lipschitz Optimization: Algorithms, Implementations and Applications, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  • Rosenfield, D. B. (1983), Optimal Strategies for Selling an Asset, Management Science 29(9), 1051-1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streltsov, S. and Muchnik I. (1996), Global Optimization and Line Search, Working Paper. Boston University.

  • Streltsov, S., Vakili, P. and Muchnik I. (1996), Competing intelligent Search Agents in Global Optimization, Proceedings of NIST Conference “Intelligent Systems: A Semiotic Perspective”, 293-298.

  • Stuckman, B. (1988), A Global Search Method for Optimizing Nonlinear Systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18(6), 965-977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckman, B. and Stuckman, P. (1993), Find the “best” Optimal Control Using Global Search, Computers & Electrical Engineering 19(1), 9-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Z. (1994), Adaptive Partitioned Random Search to Global Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 32(11), 2235-2244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törn, A. and Žilinskas, A. (1989) Global Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,350, Springer-Verlag.

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1979), Optimal Search for the Best Alternative, Econometrica 47(3), 641-654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žilinskas, A. (1992), A Review of Statistical Models for Global Optimization, J. of Global Optimization 2(2), 145-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhigliavskii, A.A. (1991), Theory of Global Random Search, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Streltsov, S., Vakili, P. A Non-myopic Utility Function for Statistical Global Optimization Algorithms. Journal of Global Optimization 14, 283–298 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008284229931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008284229931

Navigation