Skip to main content
Log in

IDDT Testing versus IDDQ Testing

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IDDQ testing has progressed to become a worldwide accepted test method to detect CMOS IC defects. However, it is noticed that observing the average transient current can lead to improvements in real defect coverage, which is referred to IDDT testing. This letter presents a formal procedure to identify IDDT testable faults, and to generate input vector pairs to detect the faults based on Boolean process. It is interesting to note that those faults may not be detected by IDDQ or other test methods, which shows the significance of IDDT testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Levi, “CMOS is Most Testable,” Proc. ITC, Oct. 1981, pp. 217–220.

  2. Y.K. Malaiya and S.Y.H. Su, “A New Fault Model and Testing Technique for CMOS Devices,” Proc. ITC, Sept. 1982, pp. 25– 34.

  3. M.E. Levitt, K. Roy, and J.A. Abraham, “BiCMOS Fault Models: Is Stuck-At Adequate?” Proc. ICCD, pp. 294–297, 1990.

  4. J.M. Soden et al., “IDDQ Testing: A Review,” JETTA, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 291–304, Dec. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.Z. Makki, S. Su, and T. Nagle, “Transient Power Supply Current Testing of Digital CMOS Circuits,” Proc. ITC, Oct. 1995, pp. 892–901.

  6. S.T. Su, R.Z. Makki, and T. Nagle, “Transient Power Supply Current Monitoring·A New Test Method for CMOS VLSI Circuits,” Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23–44, Feb. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Vinnakota, “Monitoring Power Dissipation for Fault Detection,” Proc. IEEE 14th VLSI Test Symposium, 1996, pp. 483–488.

  8. Y.C. Kim, K.K. Saluja, X. Wen, and B. Vinnakota, “On IDDT Testing of CMOS Circuits for Stuck-Open Faults,” Proc. International Conf. On Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, Singapore, 1997.

  9. Y. Min, Z. Li, and Z. Zhao, “Boolean Process,” Science in China (Series E), Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 250–257, June 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.N. Najm, “Transition Density: A New Measure of Activity in Digital Circuits,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 310– 323, Feb. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Zhao, Y. Min, and Z. Li, “Waveform Polynomial Manipulation using BDDs,” Proc. Fifth Asian Test Symp., Taiwan, Nov. 1996, pp. 136–141.

  12. S.M. Menon, A.P. Jayasumana, and Y.K. Malaiya, “Testable Design for BiCMOS Stuck-Open Fault Detection,” Proc. 11th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, Atlantic City, NJ, April, 1993, pp. 296–302.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Min, Y., Li, Z. IDDT Testing versus IDDQ Testing. Journal of Electronic Testing 13, 51–55 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008337200506

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008337200506

Navigation