This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alchourró n, C.E. (1993). Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals. In: Meijer, J.-J. Ch. & Wieringa, R.J. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science, 43–84. John Wiley, London.
Allen, L.E. & Saxon, C.S. (1993). A-Hohfeld: A Language for Robust Structural Representation of Knowledge in the Legal Domain to Build Interpretation-Assistance Expert Systems. In: Meyer, J-J. Ch. & Wieringa, R.J. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Normative System Specification, 205–224. John Wiley, London.
Å qvist, L. (1967). Good Samaritans, Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives, and Epistemic Obligations. Noû s1, 361–379.
Castañ eda, H.N. (1981). The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in One Fell Swoop. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) New Studies in Deontic Logic, 37–86. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Chellas, B.F. (1980). Modal Logic; An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chisholm, R.M. (1963). Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic, Analysis24, 33–36.
Hage, J.C. (1997). Reasoning with Rules, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hansson, B. (1969). An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, 121–147. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hilpinen, R. (ed.) (1971), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hohfeld, W.N. (1913). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, Yale Law Journal23, 16.
Horty, J. (1993). Deontic Logic as Founded in Nonmonotonic Logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence9, 69–91.
Jones, A.J.I. & Sergot, M. (1992). Deontic Logic in the Representation of Law: Towards a Methodology. Artificial Intelligence and Law1, 45–64.
Lewis, D. (1974). Semantic Analyses for Dyadic Deontic Logic. In: Stendlund, S. (ed.) Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, 1–14. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Lindahl, L. (1977). Position and Change; A Study in Law and Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Loewer, B. & Belzer, M. (1983). Dyadic Deontic Detachment. Synthese54, 295–319.
Pollock, J.L. (1987). Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science11, 481–518.
Prakken, H. & Sartor, G. (1996). A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4(3/4), 331–368. Also in Prakken, H. & Sartor, G. (eds.) (1997). Logical Models of Legal Argumentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Prakken, H. & Sergot, M. (1994). Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives, Defeasibility and Violability In: Jones, A.J.I. & Sergot, M. (eds.) Deon '94, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, pp. 296- 318.
Reiter, R. (1980). A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence13, 81–132.
Ross, W.D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Van Fraassen, B. (1973). Values and the Heart's Command. The Journal of Philosophy70, 5–19.
Von Wright, G.H. (1971). A New System of Deontic Logic. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, 105–120. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hage, J. Donald Nute (ed.), Defeasible Deontic Logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8, 75–91 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008338019879
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008338019879