Skip to main content
Log in

Global Optimization For Molecular Clusters Using A New Smoothing Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strategies involving smoothing of the objective function have been used to help solve difficult global optimization problems arising in molecular chemistry. This paper proposes a new smoothing approach and examines some basic issues in smoothing for molecular configuration problems. We first propose a new, simple algebraic way of smoothing the Lennard-Jones energy function, which is an important component of the energy in many molecular models. This simple smoothing technique is shown to have close similarities to previously-proposed, spatial averaging smoothing techniques. We also present some experimental studies of the behavior of local and global minimizers under smoothing of the potential energy in Lennard-Jones problems. An examination of minimizer trajectories from these smoothed problems shows significant limitations in the use of smoothing to directly solve global optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azmi, A., Byrd, R.H., Eskow, E., and Schnabel, R.B. (1997), The New Protein Smoothing Paper in preparation.

  2. Byrd, R.H., Eskow, E., and Schnabel, R.B. (1995), A New Large-Scale Global Optimization Method and its Application to Lennard-Jones Problems Technical Report CU-CS–630–92, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Colorado, revised.

  3. Byrd, R.H., Derby, T., Eskow, E., Oldenkamp, K., and Schnabel, R.B. (1994), A New Stochastic/Perturbation Method for Large-Scale Global Optimization and its Application to Water Cluster Problems, in W. Hager, D. Hearn and P. Pardalos (eds.), Large-Scale Optimization: State of the Art, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byrd, R.H., Dert, C.L., Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G., and Schnabel, R.B. (1990), Concurrent Stochastic Methods for Global Optimization, Mathematical Programming, 46: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byrd, R.H., Eskow, E., van der Hoek, A., Schnabel, R.B, Shao, C-S., and Zou, Z. (1995), Global Optimization Methods for Protein Folding Problems, in P. Pardalos, D. Shalloway, and G. Xue (eds.), Proceedings of the DIMACS Workshop on Global Minimization of Nonconvex Energy Functions:Molecular Conformation and Protein Folding, American Mathematical Society, 29–39.

  6. Coleman, T., Shalloway, D. and Wu, Z. (1992) Isotropic Effective Energy Simulated Annealing Searches for Low Energy Molecular Cluster States, Technical Report CTC-92-TR113, Center for Theory and Simulation in Science and Engineering, Cornell University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman, T., Shalloway, D. and Wu, Z. (1993), A Parallel Build-up Algorithm for Global Energy Minimizations of Molecular Clusters Using Effective Energy Simulated Annealing, Technical Report CTC-93-TR130, Center for Theory and Simulation in Science and Engineering, Cornell University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman, T. and Wu, Z. (1994), Parallel Continuation-Based Global Optimization for Molecular Conformation and Protein Folding, Technical Report CTC-94-TR175, Center for Theory and Simulation in Science and Engineering, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farges, J., DeFeraudy, M.F., Raoult, B., and Torchet, G. (1985), Cluster Models Made of Double Icosahedron Units, Surface Sci., 156: 370–378.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman, D.L. and Doll, J.D. (1985), Quantum Monte Carlo Study of the Thermodynamic Properties of Argon Clusters: the Homogeneous Nucleation of Argon in Argon Vapor and ‘Magic Number’ Distributions in Argon Vapor, J. Chem. Phys., 82: 462–471.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoare, M.R. (1979), Structure and Dynamics of Simple Microclusters, Adv. Chem. Phys., 40: 49–135.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoare, M.R. and Pal, P. (1971), Physical Cluster Mechanics: Statics and Energy Surfaces for Monatomic Systems, Adv. Phys., 20: 161–196.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Judson, R.S., Colvin, M.E.I., Meza, J.C., Huffer, A. and Gutierrez, D. (1992), Do Intelligent Configuration Search Techniques Outperform Random Search for Large Molecules?, SAND91–8740.

  14. Kostrowicki, J., Piela, L., Cherayil, B.J., and Scheraga, A. (1991), Performance of the Diffusion Equation Method in Searches for Optimum Structures of Clusters of Lennard-Jones Atoms, J. Phys. Chem. 95: 4113–4119.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maranas, C. D. and Floudas C. A. (1992), A Global Optimization Approach for Lennard-Jones Microclusters, J. Chem. Phys. 97: 7667.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Northby, J.A. (1987), Structure and Binding of Lennard-Jones Clusters:13 ⩽ N ⩽ 147, J. Chem. Phys. 87: 6166–6177.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oresic, M., and Shalloway, D. (1994), Hierarchical Characterization of Energy Landscapes using Gaussian Packet States, J. Chem. Phys. 101: 9844–9857.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pillardy, J., and Piela, L. (1995), Molecular Dynamics on Deformed Potential Energy Hypersurfaces, J. Phys. Chem. 99: 11805–11812.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schnabel, R.B., Koontz, J.E., and Weiss, B.E. (1985), A Modular System of Algorithms of Unconstrained Minimization, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 11: 419–440.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shalloway, D. (1991), Packet Annealing: A Deterministic Method for Global Minimization, with Application to Molecular Conformation, Global Optimization, C. Floudas and P. Pardalos (eds.), Princeton University Press.

  21. Shao, C-S., Byrd, R.H., Eskow, E., and Schnabel, R.B. (1997), Global Optimization for Molecular Clusters Using a New Smoothing Approach, in L.T. Biegler, T.F. Coleman, A.R. Conn and F.N. Santosa (eds.), Large-Scale Optimization with Applications, Part III: Molecular Structure and Optimization, The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications 94: Springer, New York, 163–199.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, S.L., Eskow, E. and Schnabel, R.B. (1989), Adaptive, Asynchronous Stochastic Global Optimization Algorithms for Sequential and Parallel Computation, in T.F. Coleman and Y. Li (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Large-Scale Numerical Optimization, SIAM, Philadelphia, 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walse, D.J., and Doye, J.P.K. (1997), Global Optimization by Basin-Hopping and the Lowest Energy Structures of Lennard-Jones Clusters Containing Up to 110 Atoms, J. Phys. Chem. 101: 5111–5116.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Doye, J.P.K., Walse, D.J., and Miller, M.A. (1998), Thermodynamics and the Global Optimization of Lennard-Jones Clusters, J. Chem. Phys. 109: 8143–8153.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wille, L.T. (1975), Minimum-Energy Configurations of Atomic Clusters: New Results Obtained by Simulated Annealing, Chem. Phys. Lett. 133: 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, Z. (1993), The Effective Energy Transformation Scheme as a Special Continuation Approach to Global Optimization with Application to Molecular Conformation, Technical Report CTC-93-TR143, Center for Theory and Simulation in Science and Engineering, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xue, G. (1994), Improvement of the Northby Algorithm for Molecular Conformation: Better Solutions,, J. Global Optimization 4: 425.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shao, CS., Byrd, R., Eskow, E. et al. Global Optimization For Molecular Clusters Using A New Smoothing Approach. Journal of Global Optimization 16, 167–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008387208683

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008387208683

Navigation