Skip to main content
Log in

Coreflectivity of E-Monads and Algebraic Hulls

  • Published:
Applied Categorical Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let Xbe a category with a given(E,M)-factorization structure for morphisms, MMono X. In general, an arbitrary endofunctor T of X fails badly to preserve the E-class. If T carries a monad structure, then T(E) ⫆ E implies that the corresponding category of Eilenberg–Moore-algebras admits (E,M)-factorizations and vice versa. In order to get T as close as possible to this nice algebraic behaviour, a couniversal modification T↪ T with (E) ⫆ E is constructed in two different ways using mild and natural assumptions on E and M, respectively. T inherits its monad structure from T. In case of T = U F, FU, the Eilenberg–Moore-category of T contains a universal (E,M-algebraic hull (completion) of U [2, 3]. There are further applications to varietal hulls [4] and to function spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adámek, J., Herrlich, H. and Strecker, G. E.: Abstract and Concrete Categories, Wiley, 1990.

  2. Bargenda, H.: Algebraische Hüllen rechtsadjungierter Funktoren, Thesis, Universität Bremen, 1987.

  3. Bargenda, H.: Universal algebraic completions of right adjoint functors, in Category Theory at Work, Heldermann, Berlin, 1991, pp. 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bargenda, H. and Richter, G.: Varietal hulls of functors, Quaestiones Math. 4(1980), 121–158.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binz, E.: Continuous Convergence on C.X/, Lecture Notes in Math. 469, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, R.: Ten topologies for X _ Y, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 14(1963), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Činčura, J.: Tensor products in the category of topological spaces, Comment.Math. Univ. Carol. 20(1979), 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eilenberg, S. and Moore, J.C.: Adjoint functors and triples, Illinois J. Math. 9(1965), 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herrlich, H.: Regular categories and regular functors, Canad. J. Math. 26(1974), 709–720.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herrlich, H.: Cartesian closed topological categories, Math. Colloq. Univ. Cape Town 9(1974), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herrlich, H.: Categorical topology 1971–1981, in Proc. 5th Prague Top. Symp., Prague 1981, Heldermann, Berlin, 1982, pp. 279–383.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isbell, J.: A note on complete closure algebras, Math. Systems Theory 3(1969), 310–312.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katěetov, M.: Measures in fully normal spaces, Fund. Math. 38(1951), 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knight, C. J., Moran, W. and Pym, J. S.: The topologies of separate continuity. I, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 68(1970), 663–671.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lawson, J. and Madison, B.: On congruences and cones, Math. Z. 120(1971), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manes, E. G.: Algebraic Theories, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richter, G.: Kategorielle Algebra, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richter, G.: Algebra_ Topology?!, in Category Theory at Work, Heldermann, Berlin, 1991, pp. 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter, G. Coreflectivity of E-Monads and Algebraic Hulls. Applied Categorical Structures 8, 161–173 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008606215120

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008606215120

Navigation