Abstract
We are interested in information management for decision support applications, especially those that monitor distributed, heterogeneous databases to assess time-critical decisions. Users of such applications can easily be overwhelmed with data that may change rapidly, may conflict, and may be redundant. Developers are faced with a dilemma: either filter out most information and risk excluding critical items, or gather possibly irrelevant or redundant information, and overwhelm the decision maker. This paper describes a solution to this dilemma called decision-centric information monitoring (DCIM). First, we observe that decision support systems should monitor only information that can potentially change some decision. We present an architecture for DCIM that meets the requirements implied by this observation. We describe techniques for identifying the highest value information to monitor and techniques for monitoring that information despite autonomy, distribution, and heterogeneity of data sources. Finally, we present lessons learned from building LOOKOUT, which is to our knowledge the first implementation of a top-to-bottom system performing decision-centric information monitoring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Blakely, J., Coburn, N., and Larson, P. (1989). Updating Derived Relations: Detecting Irrelevant and Autonomously Computable Updates, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 14(2).
Ceri, S. and Widom, J. (1991). Deriving production rules for incremental view maintenance. Proc. of 17th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases. Barcelona, Spain.
French, C. (1995). One size fits all database architectures do not work for DSS. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data. San Jose, CA.
Goldring, R. (1995). Things every update replication customer should know. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data. San Jose, CA.
Grass, J. and Zilberstein, S. (1997). Value-driven information gathering. AAAI Workshop on Building Resource Bounded Reasoning Systems, Providence, RI.
Gupta, A. and Mumick, I.S. (1995). Maintenance of Materialized Views: Problems, Techniques, and Applications, Data Engineering, 18(2).
Hanson, E., Al-Fayoumi, N., Carnes, C., Kandil, M., Liu, H., Lu, M., Park, J., and Vernon, A. (1997). TriggerMan: An Asynchronous Trigger Processor as an Extension to an Object-Relational DBMS. Technical Report TR–97-024, University of Florida, ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/cis/tech-reports/tr97/tr97-024.ps
Heimbigner, D. and McLeod, D. (1985). A Federated Architecture for Information Management, Transactions on Office Information Systems, 3(3).
Hull, R. and Zhou, G. (1996). A framework for supporting data integration using the materialized and virtual approaches. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data. Montreal, Canada.
Joint Chiefs of Staff (1992). C4I for the Warrior: Objective Concept.
Lehner, P., Elsaesser, C., and Musman, S. (1994). Constructing belief networks to evaluate plans. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Lehner, P., Elsaesser, C., and Seligman, L. (1996). Using Bayesian networks to support decision-focused information retrieval. Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Systems: A Semiotic Perspective.
Lickteig, C. (1994). Information Management of Future Platoon Leaders: An Initial Investigation. US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Liu, L., Pu, C., Tang, W., Buttler, D., Biggs, J., Benninghoff, P., Han, W., and Yu, F. (1998). CQ: A personalized update monitoring toolkit. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data.
Neopoliton, R. (1994). Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems, John Wiley and Sons.
Noy, N.F. and Hafner, C. (1997). The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Survey and Comparative Review, AI Magazine, 18(3).
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Raiffa, H. (1970). Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Seligman, L. and Kerschberg, L. (1997). A Mediator for Approximate Consistency: Supporting 'Good Enough' Materialized Views, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 8(2), http://cise.krl.gmu.edu/KRG/MAC folder/MAC.pdf
Seligman, L. and Rosenthal, A. (1996). A metadata resource to promote data integration. IEEE Metadata Conference, http://www.computer.org/conferen/meta96/seligman/seligman.html
Simon, E. and Kotz-Dittrich, A. (1995). Promises and realities of active database systems. Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases. Zurich, Switzerland.
Sistla, A.P. and Wolfson, O. (1995). Temporal conditions and integrity constraints in active database systems. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data. San Jose, CA.
Smelley, Major P. United States Air Force (1995). Personal communication.
Smith, K., Seligman, L., Mattox, D., and Rosenthal, A. (1996). Distributed situation monitoring: Issues and architectures.Workshop on Materialized Views at ACM-SIGMOD (Views '96). Montreal, http://www.mitre.org/pubs/data_mgt/Papers/Views96.pdf
Stonebraker, M. and Rowe, L. (1986). The design of POSTGRES. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data. Washington, DC.
Wiederhold, G. (1992). Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems, IEEE Computer, 25(3).
Wiederhold, G. (Ed.) (1996). Special Issue on Intelligent Integration of Information, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 6(2/3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seligman, L., Lehner, P., Smith, K. et al. Decision-Centric Information Monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 14, 29–50 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008763603052
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008763603052