Skip to main content
Log in

Code Combining of Reed–Muller Codes in an Indoor Wireless Environment

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radio communications are often desirable for data and voice communications in an indoor environment. Wireless technology offers an improved mobility since the users are not confined to any particular location by wires. This paper investigates the use of Reed–Muller codes in an indoor wireless environment. Code combining is used to exploit the multiple signal copies resulting from the inherent frequency diversity of spread spectrum. The performance of Reed–Muller codes is compared with that of convolutional codes of similar rates and comparable decoding complexity. The complete weight distribution of various Reed–Muller codes is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.K. Simon, J.K. Omura, R.A. Scholtz and B.K. Levitt, Spread Spectrum Communications Handbook, Rev. ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.L. Turin, “Introduction to spread-spectrum antimultipath techniques and their application to urban digital radio” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 68, pp. 328–353, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.J. Costello and S. Lin, Error Control Coding: Fundamentals and Applications, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F.J. MacWilliams and N.J.A. Sloane, The Theory of Error Correcting Codes, New York: North-Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Chase, “Code combining - A maximum-likelihood decoding approach for combining an arbitrary number of noisy packets,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-33, pp. 385–393, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kavehrad and P.J. McLane, “Performance of low-complexity channel coding and diversity for spread spectrum in indoor, wireless communication,” AT&T Tech. Journal, Vol. 64, pp. 1927–1965, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.G. Proakis, Digital Communications, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.K. Wolf, “Efficient maximum likelihood decoding of linear block codes using a trellis,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-24, pp. 76–80, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.B. Pursley, “Performance evaluation for phase-coded spread-spectrum multiple-access communication - Part II: Code sequence analysis,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-25, pp. 800–803, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Haccoun and G. Begin, “High-rate punctured convolutional codes for Viterbi and sequential decoding,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 37, pp. 1113–1125, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Esmaeili, T.A. Gulliver and N.P. Secord, “On the trellis structure of linear block codes,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1996, 27 typed pages.

  12. J. Conan, “The weight spectra of some short low-rate convolutional codes,” IEEE Trans.Commun., Vol. COM-32, pp. 1050–1053, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Firmanto, W.T., Gulliver, T.A. Code Combining of Reed–Muller Codes in an Indoor Wireless Environment. Wireless Personal Communications 6, 359–373 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008840519827

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008840519827

Navigation