Skip to main content
Log in

Learning from Innate Behaviors: A Quantitative Evaluation of Neural Network Controllers

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim was to investigate a method of developing mobile robot controllers based on ideas about how plastic neural systems adapt to their environment by extracting regularities from the amalgamated behavior of inflexible (nonplastic) innate subsystems interacting with the world. Incremental bootstrapping of neural network controllers was examined. The objective was twofold. First, to develop and evaluate the use of prewired or innate robot controllers to bootstrap backpropagation learning for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) controllers. Second, to develop and evaluate a new MLP controller trained on the back of another bootstrapped controller. The experimental hypothesis was that MLPs would improve on the performance of controllers used to train them. The performances of the innate and bootstrapped MLP controllers were compared in eight experiments on the tasks of avoiding obstacles and finding goals. Four quantitative measures were employed: the number of sensorimotor loops required to complete a task; the distance traveled; the mean distance from walls and obstacles; the smoothness of travel. The overall pattern of results from statistical analyses of these quantities supported the hypothesis; the MLP controllers completed the tasks faster, smoother, and steered further from obstacles and walls than their innate teachers. In particular, a single MLP controller incrementally bootstrapped by a MLP subsumption controller was superior to the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T.L. and Donath, M. 1990. Animal behavior as a paradigm for developing robot autonomy. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6:145-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekey, G.A. and Goldberg, K.Y. (Eds.). 1993. Neural Networks in Robotics, Kluwer: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, S., Sauve, J.P., and Bovet, P. 1990. Spatial memory in large scale movements: Efficiency and limitations of the egocentric coding process. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 145:1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.A. 1986. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2:14-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carthy, J.D. 1963. Animal Navigation, 3rd edition, Unwin Books: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, T.S. 1996. Insect navigation en route to the goal: Multiple strategies for the use of landmarks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199:227-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Millan, J. 1996. Rapid, safe, and incremental learning of navigation strategies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 26(3):408-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnart, J.I. and Meyer, J.A. 1996. Learning reactive and planning rules in a motivationally autonomous animat. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics. Special issue on Learning autonomous robots, 26(3):381-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo, M. (Ed.). 1996. Special issue on learning autonomous robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 26(3).

  • Esch, H.E. and Burns, J.E. 1996. Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199:155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, A.S., Maurer, R., and Seguinot, V. 1996. Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199:201-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floreano, D. and Mondada, F. 1996. Evolution of homing navigation in a real mobile robot. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics. Special issue on Learning autonomous robots, 26(3):396-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C.R. 1990. The Organization of Learning, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J.L. 1986. The locale map of honey bees: do insects have cognitive maps? Science, 232:861-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.H. 1992. Imprinting and the development of face recognition: From chick to man. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1:52-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.H. and Bolhuis, J.J. 1991. Imprinting, predispositions and filial preference in the chick. In Neural and Behavioural Plasticity, R.J. Andrew (Ed.), Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, A.A. and Kumar, B.V.K.V. 1995. Potential fields and neural networks. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, M.A. Arbib (Ed.), MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatib, O. 1986. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 5:90-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krose, B. (Ed.). 1995. Special issue on reinforcement learning and robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 15.

  • McCulloch, W.A. and Pitts, W. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5:115-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeden, L.A. 1996. An incremental approach to developing intelligent neural network controllers for robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 26(3):474- 485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolfi, S. 1997. Evolving non-trivial behaviors on a real robot: A garbage collecting robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 22.

  • Nolfi, S. and Parisi, D. 1997. Learning to adapt to changing environments in evolving neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 5:75-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, C. and Nehmzow, U. 1997. Middle scale robot navigation— A case study. In Proceedings of the AISB Workshop on Spatial Reasoning in Mobile Robots and Animals, N.E. Sharkey and U. Nehmzow (Eds.), Dept. Computer Science Technical report UMCS-97-4-1; Manchester University, pp. 104-111.

  • Salomon, R. 1997. The evolution of different neuronal control structures fo autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 22.

  • Sharkey, N.E. 1997a. The new wave in robot learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 22.

  • Sharkey, N.E. 1997b. Artificial neural networks for coodination and control: The portability of experiential representations. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 22.

  • Sharkey, N.E. and Sharkey, A.J.C. 1994. Emergent cognition. Handbook of Neuropsychology, 9:347-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, N.E., Heemskerk, J.N.H., and Neary, J. 1996a. Subsuming behaviors in neural network controllers. In Proceedings of Robolearn-96: An International Workshop on Learning for Autonomous Robots, H. Hexmoor and L. Meeden (Eds.), Key West, Florida, pp. 98-104.

  • Sharkey, N.E., Heemskerk, J.N.H., and Neary, J. 1996b. Training artificial neural networks for robot control. In Solving engineering problems with neural networks, A.B. Bulsari, S. Kallio, and D. Tsaptsinos (Eds.), Systems Engineering Association, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, N.E. and Heemskerk, J.N.H. 1997. The neural mind and the robot. In Neural Network Perspective on Cognition and Adaptive Robotics, A.J. Browne (Ed.), Institute of Physics Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M.C., Zhang, S.W., Lehrer, M., and Collett, T.S. 1996. Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: Visual flight control and odometry. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199:127-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzet, C. 1997. Neural reinforcement learning for behavior synthesis. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 22.

  • von Frisch, K. 1967. Honeybees: Do they use direction and distance information provided by their dancers? Science, 158:1076-1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G.W. 1950. An imitation of life. Scientific American, 182: 42-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G.W. 1953. The Living Brain, Norton: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R. 1992. Arthropods. In Animal Homing, F. Papi (Ed.), Chapman and Hall: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, R., Michel, B., and Antonsen, P. 1996. Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199:129-140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharkey, N.E. Learning from Innate Behaviors: A Quantitative Evaluation of Neural Network Controllers. Autonomous Robots 5, 317–334 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008862423185

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008862423185

Navigation